Profile of FelixTHM

BTW. 2 PGren models have plenty of AI DPS,

Hello CODGUY.

Yes, I agree that Pgrens with Shrecks being able to barely hold their own vs combat engineers and unvetted Rear Echelons is indeed too much AI. With 2 X Pgren with shrecks, one would be able to defeat a Conscript squad or even a Riflemen squad! Truly unimaginably OP that after a Pgren squad with shrecks loses a whopping ONE model, they're still left with an astounding 25% of the original firepower of a Pgren squad.

Are you living in fantasy world?

Raketenwerfer already has a slower reload than the Pak40. Plus the Raketenwerfer has longer fire aim time. So yeah, you are making shit up. I don't want to be offensive but why would you write such non-sense when you don't even know the stats and are just too lazy to look them up?

First day on these forums?

You're trading 30 fuel to kill 70. And that's only if I happen to have AT gun and snare nearby already, because it'll take you less than a second to kill it... The problem is what exactly?

If 90 Muni for a squad wipe is OP. Then so is 50 mini for a 70 fuel investment

We keep hearing the same braindead analogy when the two things aren't even remotely comparable.

1. You can sweep for mines for your T70. You can't sweep for each of your 6+ capping squads unless you A-move 6 squads together all the time.

2. It's never 50 muni for a T70, unless opposing player was super bad or super greedy. Teller mines require a great deal of luck for the enemy to specifically run over that spot and require a great deal of guesswork. It's on average more than 200 muni of teller mines for one actual hit if you calculate it properly.

Also, experienced players will avoid/sweep/attack ground the most commonly traversed spots. Teller mines are also often detonated by stray shells.

3. Demos had monstrous AoE and got multiple models even if it wasn't a wipe. It created massive squad-loss swings very early in the game, effectively ending the game before we even got to the LV phase. And most importantly, capping and squad preservation are the core mechanics of the game (just not to GenMe), and not being able to do the most basic things in the first 10 minutes of the game are in no way comparable to possibly running over a mine much later in the game.


I've certainly lost T70s and IS2s (and hence the games) to teller mines. But my opponents invested several hundred munitions, AND I got sloppy. It's not even remotely comparable to the cancer of instant-win demos which had no possible counter.

Riflemen scale much better than either squad and are much better than Grenadiers at most ranges with or without LMG42s being involved. Riflemen only struggle somewhat versus VG thanks to their 10% RA vet 1 and relatively early STG upgrade. Provided you choose your fights wisely you shouldn't really be having issues man-for-man versus axis mainline infantry squads.

You don't even need to talk about scaling with superior veterancy bonuses and superior weapon add-ons.

Riflemen out of the gate already stomp Grens and Volks super hard. Compared to Grens, 22% more effective hit points, 40% more close range dps, 25% more mid range dps, and only 10% less long range dps. Cheaper reinforce cost, better moving accuracy, and less DPS loss per model drop. It's only in CODGUY-universe where Grens are somehow able to hang with Riflemen.

Similar story with Volks, but don't try to educate CODGUY and Riley that Riflemen are statistically superior - the stats and game files are actually Axis-biased and trying to make Axis units look less OP than they are in-game.

In 1v1, you're basically not allowed to use stock mediums against OKW. Its already difficult to use stock mediums vs OKW P4, however, the raketens have the RoF of the USF at gun and basically the penetration of a pak (only 10 less) and now have almost the same range with an extra crewman and retreat. There's little u can do to counter a raketen. I'd say it's at least as survivable as the Zis now. I think a slight pen nerf is in order

M1 fires at least 80% faster. I'm not sure what you're smoking dude. It's not even somewhat close.

The strength of the raketen is that it can creep forward and be used more aggressively than other AT guns due to retreat ability. The downside is that they can very easily be stolen if decrewed while other AT guns just get destroyed or might even still remain there when decrewed.

Rak crewmen die many times faster due to lack of gun shield + shorter range + clumping because of the smaller gun, so raks bleed a ton more manpower than other AT guns and are far more prone to being wiped.

The rak also has a slow ass projectile which results in it not being able to score scatter-collision hits like other AT guns can. The rak has a low firing angle which makes it the worst AT gun to use whenever there's an ant hill or a small twig.

Of all the cancerous things in OKW - G43 blobs, Falls, OKW Tiger with artillery, you literally had to pick a non-factor to discuss.

The rak basically made a transition from "useless except for cheese" to a decent AT gun. I guess people were too spoilt and too used to OKW not having an AT gun, and now that it actually fulfills that role people are shocked. 70% of my games this patch have been with Allies and raketens haven't been an issue or concern in a single one of them.