Profile of LoopDloop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3053

General Information


Thread: Unfair USF grenade cost 7 Nov 2018, 15:29 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2018, 23:19 PMthedarkarmadillo Volks are more durable at very 1 tho! And will Likly have a full, non armour delaying kit by then too! Yep. Fun fun. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry Section stats and some other questions7 Nov 2018, 15:27 PM IMO baseline should be considered as out of cover performance. The fact that sections perform better in cover than out of cover is more or less a buff regardless of how that’s coded to come around. It’s also worth knowing that sections perform poorly out of cover (then maybe people would stop complaining about PIAT blobs of all things) but it’s still essentially an in-cover buff that they perform better in cover than out of cover, which needs to be stated so people don’t get confused, as Jae said. Brits got nerfed because they used to be OP. They’re very weak now that they’ve had all their crutches removed and still lack a bunch of basic stuff but there’s no denying that some of their units used to be stupid overpowered. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch7 Nov 2018, 00:59 AM Armor company in general seems much less appealing than mechanized. Cav rifles bleed less than assault engies and Thompsons are great (so are flamers though) as well as vehicle satchels. Dodges offer a lot too (early game boost, mark vehicle, arty) and the 76mm sherman is millions times better than the m10 in almost literally every way. The mortar HT is also very useful. Armor just seems pretty overshadowed as it stands, only really being good for the bulldozer and shock value of 0cp assault engies. In: Lobby
Thread: Grenadiers + HMG42s vs USF7 Nov 2018, 00:45 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2018, 22:17 PMthedarkarmadillo But I can't slap BARs onto a mortar and attack move them. Relic needs to fix this obvious oversight and balance issue Now I’ve got this image of sentient mortar shells dual wielding BARs and owning poor hans. Thank you for making my day sir. Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2018, 22:03 PMSander93 However it is going to make your riflemen cost argument way less valid because USF has a huge manpower advantage with the free officer squad. That's largely offset by OKW having to pay more fuel in total to get a medium tank out. Anyway the fact that it's quite balanced is exactly my point. USF suffers from bad tech but it definitely does not suffer from Riflemen supposedly being not good enough. Except for the part where usf spends 300 mp on sidetechs and 250 for healing in exchange. Okw (if they go battlegroup) has to spend 15 twice on 2 sws halftracks (30) plus like 30 on the battlegroup tech and 10 (or 15? I don’t remember) more on medics and then 125(?) on the schwerer. That’s a total of 200 fuel for their first tank if they don’t build any light vehicles. Going mech is a different story (20 more fuel) but obviously you’ll be using light vehicles in that case and tanks will be delayed more significantly from that. USF spends 50-60 on an officer (lt or capt) then 120 for the major. However, weapon racks and nades as well as an ambulance are more or less required to be competitive, adding an additional 15+25+10=50 fuel. So best case scenario they spend 220 fuel before they get access to tanks if they don’t build lights either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Smoke pots for shermans7 Nov 2018, 00:43 AM Sherman smoke is fine as it is. It takes more micro but is more versatile (like a lot of things usf has it seems). Panzer tactician isn’t unbalanced, but it’s a little cheesy as a panic button but at the same time nowhere near as offensively useful or versatile as sherman smoke canisters. Such easy, on demand access to smoke is actually one of the things that makes me want to build Shermans instead of just always spamming Jacksons, among other things. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet mine oneshoting wehr squads7 Nov 2018, 00:39 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2018, 22:33 PMShadowLinkX37 Teller can. Tellers are now even more OP. Kappa. OP: No normal mines should be wiping more than 2 models in a squad. If 2 guys are left and they both hit a mine they’ll die but otherwise they shouldn’t be getting wiped by mines no matter how clumped they are. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: How to counter MG abuse?3 Nov 2018, 21:46 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2018, 21:26 PMferwiner To be honest the only faction that incorporates more than 2 mgs into their builds in any reasonable level of play is usf. But I would be very shocked to see codguy asking for a nerf to allied forces Wait what is this magical .50 cal spam? I'm intrigued. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Unfair USF grenade cost 3 Nov 2018, 21:03 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2018, 19:32 PMSander93 How exactly are they 1% more durable when they are at 63.5% compared to Volks 77.4%? Oh I read it wrong lol. Thought it said .86 to .85 as the final bonuses, which didn't really make sense to me. Gameplay wise seems to be much different and those numbers make more sense now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Blitzkrieg3 Nov 2018, 21:01 PM Mines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: insta kill mines3 Nov 2018, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2018, 01:39 AMd0ggY I know.. and pushing in like a true bonobo with your light vehicle without a sweeper.. that should work too : -( Can we close that thread? Get a sweeper. Kappa Yeah cuz a minefield with signs that needs to be walked through continuously to suffer significant casualties from are the same as normally hidden mines that one shot light vehicles. By the same logic the old demos and small arms fire are pretty much comparable. You sit in small arms fire for a while like an idiot, you die. You move over a demo, you die. In: COH2 Balance