Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Tie Call-Ins to tech this patch7 May 2019, 17:23 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 15:47 PMDangerous-Cloth Hm I disagree. It always misses and has horrible range until vet 2. It needs vet 2 to be truly potent. It's better than the T-34 you get for about the same price with the current moronic system. They've done it with all the new heavy tanks. I don't get why they insist on leaving fixing this glaring problem to the next patch. It's so easy to fix. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grenade Model Cap7 May 2019, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 16:36 PMShadowLinkX37 wait so if you hit a clumped 5 man rifle with a riflenade, it'd kill say 2 models but leave 3 at 1 HP? isn't that practically the same as a wipe? a single LMG burst and the squad dies anyways. Yeah maybe the squad survives if you do the old "toss grenade and retreat", but other than that it sounds pretty lethal. I just don't understand why it needs changing as well. Grenades work less the higher mmr you go since players can react better. Turning them into undodgeable light brummbar shells doesn't sound fun :/ However the Ostwind and mines work is what I'm thinking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Core changes commander Revamp Patch7 May 2019, 16:33 PM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2019, 09:48 AMblancat mills bomb) increase cost 25muni -> 30muni, make minimum range 5 A minimum range for Mills Bombs is a very important change. You beat Sections by charging in close, and right now that comes with a high wipe risk. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grenade Model Cap7 May 2019, 16:29 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 16:26 PMShadowLinkX37 That'd make them even worse vs garrisons and entrenchments, which they're supposed to clear. Only a kill cap. Not a damage cap. No garrison cover damage reduction means they'd deal the double damage they do now, and faster detonation timers means no grenade dodging. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I think it is funny7 May 2019, 16:27 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 15:37 PMDerKuhlmann That m20 has more infantry firepower than the stuart. Why build M20s if the Stuart outguns them? In: Lobby
Thread: Grenade Model Cap7 May 2019, 16:25 PM Anyone else think grenades should have a 2 model kill cap like mines do? Combine it with much faster wind-ups/detonation timers and cover bypassing (for some reason directional cover damage reduction works on them) and they'll be much more generally useful rather than squadwipe bombs that only work if the opponent's not looking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rebirth of the Sherman Jumbo idea.7 May 2019, 15:24 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 12:50 PMTiger Baron This is the CoH model from mods: Like I said, you can barely notice the extra slabs of armor unless you zoom all the way in and even then it's hard to distinguish. The shorter 75mm gun in the 76 gun turret is the biggest visual communication. Of course the 76mm gun equipped Sherman Jumbo in CoH's mods are a little hard to distinguish from the regular 76mm Sherman as well unless they're right next to each othere where you notice that one of the 2 is thicc boi. You know, I'm not entirely certain those slabs are modelled on that Jumbo. It might just be clever texturing, like the gaps in the treads. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rebirth of the Sherman Jumbo idea.7 May 2019, 15:20 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 12:54 PMT.R. Stormjäger There’s already two unique M4 variants in the game that barely see any use. Why would a third one make any difference? The Easy Eight is in a terrible doctrine. The 76mm is solid but for some reason that doctrine also has a no-brainer buff to the standard Sherman that almost immediately overshadows it. Scrap the stupid Dozer Blade upgrade and make Rifle Company good, and you'll see both. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rebirth of the Sherman Jumbo idea.7 May 2019, 12:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 12:25 PMTiger Baron There is no short barreled 76mm Sherman or Sherman with a 75mm gun equipped 76 turret tank. The 76's turret was used because of it's increased weight limit, that's why the Jumbo used it for the increased armor. So unless you put your glass on and zoom out all the way in-game in the middle of battle you will not notice the lack of literally 1mm of the armor on the model and can't confuse it it with the 76 Sherman. Whoever has at least a basic knowledge of WW2 and American Armor, which includes Sherman variants for the most part, will be fine with a shorter barreled 76 Sherman with a different icon and text. One millimetre? That's less than the width of these text characters. I'm not sure the game can even render that. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rebirth of the Sherman Jumbo idea.7 May 2019, 12:16 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2019, 12:15 PMKatitof Glasses. i walked straight into that one But seriously, what's different? Same hull, same turret. Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 19:57 PMTiger Baron He explained to me that a custom skin was used to "cut" the barrel of the 76mm Sherman. If this works the way I think it does (make the barrel texture transparent) then the main visual concern here is no texture on the end of the gun. In: COH2 Gameplay