Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: To the patch team28 Feb 2020, 10:00 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 09:55 AMVipper My message to the patch team, is thank you for your effort to improve the game. Nice words, I would be happy if I could say the same. But I am more or less disappointed by the elitist behavior of some team-members. I know relic gives the green light for patches, but the community could do much better work. There are no alphas, no testing meetings for forum-mebers. Most posts/threads are useless and will never be touched. We write/read same things since years. People with the skill of modding are disgusted and left vanilla years ago, people wanting to help doesn't get the chance. tragedy, waisted potential. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: To the patch team28 Feb 2020, 09:51 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 19:32 PMdreamerdude Probably one of the most unprofessional post of the year right here. The amount of disrespect is a lot. Maybe you can learn a bit on how to write constructively on youtube, you already got the click bait title bottled down. I'm embarrassed for you man. Sure this isn't the best patch, but grow up. The problem is, that many people doesn't want balanced fractions. They love their broken mechanics to win easy. You can even see fanboy changes made by balancing team, things nobody was asking for. Game went from multible tactical movements to one-way-style in many games. Why? Because people who have the power to balance seem too like that way. And if we don't get the line-ups fixed, I dosen't see light. Edit: Last commander-patch went in the right direction, but instead of fixing the fractions they add commanders to the broken commander system. Very sad move. xD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T328 Feb 2020, 09:46 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 05:35 AMmrgame2 Pwafer too strong a unit to mess around with. Please remove its suppression or move to vet3. Early pwafer = less counters = weaker infantry = more survival = more vet levels. Every 2v2 games will face at least 1 vet 3 pwafer with this stupid suggestions You are joking, or? Suppression is the only benefit of the Werfer, without it would be worse than every other arillery ingame for its price and fire/hit delay because of high angle fire. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T327 Feb 2020, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 17:34 PMT.R. Stormjäger How is that relevant? Stuka zu fuβ is locked behind Mech HQ which is expensive, locks out healing, and only has a light tank and a light TD alongside it. This proposal would put the panzerwerfer in a cheap tier with a great generalist medium tank and a great medium TD. If you want to write in German, then us the correct Eszett "ß" and not greek beta, also Substantivschreibung would be great. If we really want to fix Ostheer, then there has to be changed more in the line-up. But Panzerwerfer in T3 would be good. Also the tech system of Ostheer should be changed, also units like StuG E should become non-doc and Brummbär could become an exclusive call-in as buffed version. T0 Pio, Gren \| locked behind T2 tech: Panzergrenadiere T1 HMG42, Mörser, Scharfschütze T2 PaK40, 222, 251 \| locked behind T3 tech: StuG E T3 StuG G, Panzer 4 \| locked behind T4 tech: Panzerwerfer T4: Panther, Ostwind And still, I think hull-down should become non-doc for Ostheer as handy-cap buff. More or less some off-topic, but it is important to look one more than on one topic here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 16:48 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 16:42 PMKubelecer So is Vickers. Incredible argument! Curious, if you want to use HISTORICAL arguments, what's your defence on Ost having Ostwind as a stock unit? What's your opinion on tigers getting random engine damage when moving? I think they should, it's what happened in WW2 after all. True, give us some Möbelwägen or Wirbelwinds. We have the Ostwind, because Relic didn't made other blueprints. You can say same about Pershing, Comet, Centaur. We would have enough stuff to make a more logical tech, if we would mix Ostheer and OKW stuff. In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 16:35 PM It's a game, but weapons should work like they did in reality. And HMG42 was a suppression tool, Maxim was it too, but worse. So ingame Maxim does more constant damage, while HMG42 has long reload and bad turning rate. But actual Maxim overperforms, if you compare the rest of the fraction. Make a test in cheat-tools and give you some Allii stuff, simply change of Gren with a Penal, or give you some 6men Maxims, you will open your eyes. Or maybe look for some non-doc nuke grenade for every squad? Maybe give you some 120mm or Howitzers. xD In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 15:42 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 14:06 PMMusti Yeah, like that Pgren squad than ran straight through and threw a nade at it, definitely enough suppresion to stop every squad n the game Shit I think Obers can just solo it, like they do with a Vickers, gotta test this. Ober is no normal unit, it is the high DMG unit, more than a sniper to force such situations. The problem with them is that CoH2 has no logical indicators for weaponprofiles and the community team isn't interested in fixing them. Like Stormtroups MP40 should use the PPsh blueprint and Obers K98 should use G43 blueprint. And there are situations Maxim sucks, because instead of suppression it benefits of permanent fire with low reload. If you has enough range you will pin, you can't have everything. Like an other comment said, give it Stats of HMG34 more suppression less DPS. And you know what will happen?It will be a nerf. xD In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 10:47 AMT.R. Stormjäger Here’s a joke for you. 4 Volks walk into a Vickers and run away screaming. 4 volks run into a Maxim and recrew it. The logic? Maxim has enough suppression to stop every solo squad. Flame-nade of Volks is a joke and if they get in range you have enough time to move the Maxim. Maybe you are salty because of cover-use? The main-problem of Maxim is, that only soviets can use it out of cover with less brain, because 6 men. xD Changes to be made without dps change: - Maxim needs old angle, but a defensive mode, setup-time of HMG42 but angle like in garrison. - 120mm mortar needs a crew of 3 or 4 and range down to 90 (not 100). So Ostheers counter-fire ability of Mortar gets some use. - HMG42 can also get a crew of 3. In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 13:00 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 09:35 AMdistrofio Maxims tear apart infantry inside buildings. Funny thing no one mentions that. Like vickers they are very good when garrisoned. Maxims is a trash unit in the hands of a trash player... Oh wait, i know whats comming... "WSTUKA WIPES IT IN NO TIME! / DEATHLOOP BLABLA / SUPPRESSION IS BAD" Well id say with that logic that shocks are trash units becasause their PPSH cant damage a P4. The game has some stupid double-morals. That is one of it. E.g. I would be fine with 3 man HMG42 crew if Vickers and Maxim gets some needed nerfs, like I said some micro handy-caps. Beside, does someone understand why Tommies get cover bonus, but also Vickers gets it? Shouldn't be the infantry handycaped if the support weapons overperform? Like Grens and Osttruppen are bad in close combat because the HMG is good? There are many things arn't ok in CoH2. Maybe I start modding again to show other balancing ways, in hope the games becomes more tactical instead of a jump and run. In: Lobby
Thread: Pwerfer on T327 Feb 2020, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 09:04 AMmrgame2 Was pwafer in t3 before? Im old don't remember Alpha, yes. Also Ele was a normal unit. That is also something to come back to balance tank-hunter situation. In: COH2 Balance