Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:31 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:28 AMT.R. Stormjäger I agree with Sander93, this really isn’t much of an issue. Will the nerf make game more fun? Sure, I am kind of trolling... but I could vomit when thinking about emplacments. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:28 AM Its not about how useless the ability will be, but how cancer emplacments still are. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:17 AMSupport Sapper Did you test it ? If didn't, please do it before. flame barrage is not removed, it just no longer do ADDITIONAL damage vs emplacements, so now instead of outright burn any emplacement to dust, they do consistent damage like any other flame weapons. That is true, but in some situations (larger multiplayer) sim-city is still a thing and then fire is needed. Emplacment's balance is difficult story, still cancer and still bad, Brits destroyed the game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why do people think ass grens suck2 Feb 2020, 10:17 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:02 AMZeroZeroNi Ahh.... Let me get this straight, despite people saying they suck you think adding an stg would make them OP compared other infantry of same cost(280 mp + 0cp) getting 2 Elite Thompsons. Just just.. amazing. OST must clearly be OP in your mind then. Open your eyes, Alliis fan-boys dominate the game-balance and counter-options arn't distributed fraction-neutral. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:43 AMKatitof Update your game, you seem to be 3 years behind. How? Both axis factions have stock units to hardcounter them from safe distance. Both axis factions have early game doctrinal option to ROFLSTOMP them. Its only OP if you refuse to counter it. Emplacements are unpleasent to play against, but to say they are overpowered is plain bullshit at this point. In 1vs1 you are right, who is talking about 1vs1 only? I don't go deeper into it, because you know you have a very narrow-minded view over game-modes and you love to talk about 1vs1 only, while I try to have a bridged view. Brits have a very bad design to handle different that. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion2 Feb 2020, 09:57 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:50 AMMr Carmine The brum and stug e seem worth to test. The ostruppen i am not sure about. The 251 i am no fan of. It already has been buffed with things ost didnt need. The flametrack will become to good. It also benegitss from pzr tct wich helps it survive. Also why should it be tougher the other halftracks actualy? The stug g idea is interesting. I personaly would only allow it to turn when orderd to like an at gun or mg. By making it an ability. And make it 65 range probably. The change to 251 would be mainly because of path-finding problems, it often gets hit even when microed well. If e.g. it only gets 20hp more it would have the chance to survive some movements. But yes, a smaller target sice would be maybe good enough. Edit: Maybe increase the health of normal 251, but lower it for flamer-version? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:51 AM I only see hope by overwork the hole emplacement situation. a. make the mortar-pit a doctrinal unit of def.-commander. b. give Brits normal mortar-squads with reload-deficites. c. let them able to be garrison in trenches, give them 100 range and normal reload in trenches. But that will not happen... so be lucky by having a bad fraction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:42 AMmrgame2 Ukf was fine outside their initial OP intro, when bofors shred anything in sight. In past 2 years, firefly is buffed. We had brens blobs in 2v2, team games. Churchill pretty much dominate 2v2. Piats have been made really good. I dont see this winter trial as fixing ukf. More reactionary to wc19. They make them more broken in well known unblanced situations. They hole-fraction plays with bad map-design making them bad or OP, because enemy doesn't have the tools to handle without lucky commader, by usesing other stupid OP-stuff. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:40 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:38 AMSupport Sapper It take about 2 year for the mod team to finally trying to fix UKF. You dont know about the endless neft series UKF has been through from the release up to very currently. Cause again, you dont play UKF. Brits should be removed, would be better for balance. The fraction is dead because the hole design isn't good, after years of picking nose the resources for a real fix are gone. Edit: e.g. look at the new commander... the stuff shouldn't be in a commander, but non-doc. Why they didn't made it... ask the patch-team. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:34 AMSupport Sapper Emplacements OP only vs noobs. They are OP by their stats, thet doesn't means they can't be countered. Still OP by map-designs, can't be fixed because the hole game shouldn't be designed by stuff never should be added in game -> british fraction. Edit: Many people and mod-teams tried to fix the emplacement situation, it isn't possible like you see. One option was to rempace it, give brits normal mortars with range deficit and give them the option for range-buff if garrisoned in the trench-emplacemnt brits can build non-doc. Would be an easy way, relic and patch-team decided for something else. In: COH2 Gameplay