Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.319 Mar 2020, 15:03 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 14:46 PMT.R. Stormjäger No And why not? The hole mechanic is stupid, while beeing OP in right hands. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.319 Mar 2020, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 14:03 PMVipper Actually the upgrade is a monstrosity and it should be removed... +1 That would be best. Edit: Can we please remove Ostheer's scope? Simply give 222 same spotting option as T70? All-over 222 is an useless piece. And why not reduce target-sice of ligh-vehilces? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Standardization19 Mar 2020, 14:08 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 08:44 AMGoldenpunch You shall not kill asymmetrical design of this game. Asymmetrical design started to die first patches after release. There was a time Elefant had spotting option like SU85 etc. and more, after the years a lot of gimmicks were moved to other fractions to balance them, that is a positive step. Ostheer got nerfed to make place for OKW. Then brits were designed as Ostheer-clone etc. Now have so many spotting options for soviets fraction, non-doc cancer = nobrainer. Fan-boy move. Can community stop fighing from fraction positions? Simply make them balanced, without any fan-boy shit? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.319 Mar 2020, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 13:37 PMVipper There 2 dozer and 105 and upgrade Sherman. Think that is what is causing the confusion. So he means 75mm Sherman with armor-upgrade? Shouldn't Dozers should be the same? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.319 Mar 2020, 13:29 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 12:17 PMVipper Sherman FF is TD and Dozer 105 is assault gun and not main battle tank (medium tanks). That is what I said, but he said bulldozer was changed too, so I posted the change-log that it wasn't. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.319 Mar 2020, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 20:52 PMRoastinGhost I think the Sherman Dozer upgrade should raise target size back to 23. Additionally, it should remove the hull mg, as it currently shoots through the blade. "The changes will not apply to Tank Destroyers and specialist vehicles based on a medium tank chassis. Units like the Sherman Firefly and Sherman 105mm will remain the same due to their role." Or what do you mean? Edit: When will be release? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: infantry balance17 Mar 2020, 22:12 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 22:02 PMelchino7 No. The problem is the way it burst and the whole "high dmg" profile. There are times that it snipes a model and takes time to re-fire failing to suppress. Same problems is with MG of T34 vs. hull-MG and turret-MG or Pnz4. Panzer 4 has more DPS, but because it will shoot on different crew-members T34 can kill e.g. a gunner way faster so it gets benefits versus PaKs. That are mechanics very RNG and op. Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 22:09 PMSkysTheLimit I think you mean it needs cons to merge with it just to keep it alive. The death loop consistently makes the 6 men crew absolutely meaningless The maxim is just awful, I don't understand how some people can still debate this Maybe change the hole way it works... I am working on something in my barin for modding. ^^ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: infantry balance17 Mar 2020, 21:35 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 21:23 PMthedarkarmadillo Just reading the OP and nothing else, you only play axis yes? Guessing you've played tops 10games of the other 3 factions? Calling something overpowerd doesn't mean that it is full broken, or game-destroying. But that there are mechanics which arn't balanced in every direction, if compared. We can also call it problematic or simply not good. The blue-print should be looked last, first mechanics should be fair. And Maxim is a special candidate, because it has multible problems and has to be fixed different, which produces new problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: infantry balance17 Mar 2020, 20:48 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 20:44 PMCardboard Tank The Allied infantry advantage would not be a problem if Axis actually got their tank advantage. But that's somehow not wanted despite being their historic flavour and intended design. Most tanks are good balanced at the moment. Even the tank-hunter situations is kind of ok in 1vs1 and 2vs2. But for Soviets it would be time to reduce support-weapons crew sice to 5 instead of 6. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: infantry balance17 Mar 2020, 20:39 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 20:34 PMelchino7 But that's not RNG. RNG is having your MG kill a model, having to re-aim and wasting valuable time. Or shooting 1 burst and reloading. Maxim is consistently bad for cost and only carried by the fact that OKW still exist so we are still worried by Maxim spam. Merge been an issue is like complaining that T2 support heavy with HT and constantly reinforcing is an issue. You are just trading the reinforce time and back to base from the maxim with another conscript squad. If you are trying to fight MG vs MG on a 1v1 case, then you are doing it wrong. AGAIN. There's nothing RNG in those. Isn't british placing also RNG? a. it works and is OP or b. the hole path-finding sucks. Same for Maxim, a, it gets killed by two mortar hits or can take minutes of direct fire. All by the fact of random placing mechanics or bug-using. Same for the loop-of-death fix ingame, that the crew is target instead of gunner first, in many situations that reduces potential of killing it, making it more resistant than other HMGs (ok, they doesn't have loop-of-death) beeing also RNG. Maxim is the RNG king, of beeing OP while beeing shit. In: COH2 Balance