Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: Sweepers in half track's shouldn't detect mines.3 Apr 2020, 22:28 PM Better give negative clear-speed if suppressed. That is something needed since years. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What if we made the Flame Hetzer a useful unit? 3 Apr 2020, 14:25 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2020, 14:13 PMWAAAGH2000 I though just change tech request to T4 without upgrade,or reduce build cost That is good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What if we made the Flame Hetzer a useful unit? 3 Apr 2020, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2020, 10:46 AMT.R. Stormjäger I’d like to see the Ostwind made relevant in the Scavenge doctrine. Currently it’s not worth building. I’d like to see it in T4 but not require upgrade. The Hetzer could probably benefit from that as well, One good way would be to change it with Tiger... but now we got this stupid new commander with that unit... There could be a funny mechanism you need to salvage to get access to special abilities etc. a ambush for infantry etc. There would be so many cool things to make. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What if we made the Flame Hetzer a useful unit? 3 Apr 2020, 11:14 AM Hetzer... if it would be as OP as other units the balancing tears would get big, because an open eye is defenseless without closed eyelids. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.31 Apr 2020, 10:51 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2020, 10:44 AMKatitof And... where did I said it was a tank? You're brainfarting HARD today. Is it the font? Ihr seid alle behindert, einen schönen ersten April! You are all handicapped, a nice 1st april! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter Balance 1.3.5 notes1 Apr 2020, 10:48 AM Behindert In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Pioneer [combat-design change]30 Mar 2020, 10:54 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 05:21 AMAerohank Royal Engies are in the same situation with their docrinal flamers. Personally I don't think it is a big deal. Yes and no, because they have the cover-bonus-system [cooldown multiplier 0.83 (1/1.2) and reload multiplier 0.71 (1/1.4)] AND get massive fire-bonus at vet1 -70% cooldown in the cover +50% reload speed in cover AND vet3 -33% received accuracy. Don't forget the option to upgrade Bren and 5th men-upgrade. [Edit: the cover-system is from 2016, I am not sure about the current bonus-system. I am sorry, I will check it now.] So, more or less they arn't in same situation, because instead of Ostheer's Pio, Royal Engineers can stay in action way longer, with Vet3 min. 33% longer. With 5th men ~ 53% longer. ...... And here is my point. a. make them looking more unique with Luger, so they can stay at the current DPS-balance (Luger instead of bad version of MP40) b. boost their upgrade while give a logic indicator for the buff-situation (Luger -> MP40) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Pioneer [combat-design change]29 Mar 2020, 21:57 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2020, 21:32 PMVipper Imo engineer should have to routes. Repair/build oriented with sweepers upgrades taking up all slot and combat oriented. If you leaves pioneer with smgs after upgrade one should at least try to change the formation so that at least the flamer is in the rear and smgs fire at closer range. They shouldn't overperform for their price. The flamer is a very harsh weapon in use, because under the 5m range mark it will get problems to hit units because of movement (one main-problem with the actual Pios, their weapons become useful at ~10 range. Over 15 they come useless, the main-range of flamers). With Assault-Grens guns they would perform at 20m range like combat engineers. Closer they would be able to hold ground, because of good DPS, while only beeing 3 men. (so the bleed is like Ostheer should be). Something Ostheer's units suck at, open a meta beside of Panzergrens, while beeing balanced. Edit: We could make same with a modifier, but I would simply like to see Luger Pistol. ^^ lets make CoH nice again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Pioneer [combat-design change]29 Mar 2020, 19:53 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2020, 19:50 PMKatitof Because there is a difference between personal choice and balance issue. I don't see latter here. a. fixing unlogical weapon-profiles (there is no other weapon ingame with so a large DPS span) b. fixing unlogical upgrade. And sure, there is a personal choice. Like, why brits have a He111 in their bombing run? Firefly using hit-marker of Jagdtiger? etc. Games doesn't looks logical and could be better, by optics. Edit: I try to find solutions to fix more things with one step. One thing the game would benefit form. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Pioneer [combat-design change]29 Mar 2020, 19:45 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2020, 19:43 PMKatitof So don't. Keep them as sweepers. Its not like ost doesn't have flamethrowing alternative. Don't fix what isn't broken. Wouldn't that fit for nearly all changes made the last years? Why buffing Cons, they have Penals? xD So, thats the logic of flamer? Waisting an unit, to hope the flamer gets dropped to pic it with PnzGrens or AssaultGrens? In: COH2 Balance