Winter balance mod 2020 V1.3

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 21:08 PMProtos Angelus

Agreed, Pershing is meant to be to infantry, what COVID-19 is to humans, a destroyer. The whole "IN LINE WITH" BS needs to stop.

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 22:02 PMKoRneY

Tiger : AOE damage from 1/0.25/0.15 to 0.75/0.25/0.15
AOE distance from 0.25/1.5/3 to 0/1/3

Is2 : AOE damage from 1/0.35/0.175 to 0.75/0.35/0.175
AOE distance from 0/1.35/3 to 0/0.85/3

Pershing : AOE damage near from 1/0.4/0.175 to 0.75/0.4/0.175
AOE distance from 0.25/1.5/3.25 to 0/1/3.25

Pershing is still top against infantry. If you think any of the heavies needed to stay the same then your 500 hours of comp stomping haven't helped you learn shit.

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 23:17 PMProtos Angelus

Those are minor differences, 8% and 15%. For a heavy with the lowest amount of armour/hp and no top gunner (like tiger), yeah, I'm calling "more in line with" BS. I love the fact that you call me a comp stomper when the truth couldn't be further. Extracting one data that shows a minor minority advantage and calling it "still top" is laughable.

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 01:22 AMmrgame2

Pershing also have lowest range and worthless ability. Yet Pershing call in timing and resources are no where as cheap as tiger.

It is also in 1 doctrine thats poorest choice in team games

Give it a break ost Bois.

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 00:51 AMKoRneY

A Tiger has 10% more armor and 80 more hp. So "8% and 15%" more firepower is pretty reasonable, considering it has better tds to back it up.

Asking for it to stay the same is laughable. Sorry, they're not going to patch in skill for you.

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 01:22 AMmrgame2

Pershing also have lowest range and worthless ability. Yet Pershing call in timing and resources are no where as cheap as tiger.

It is also in 1 doctrine thats poorest choice in team games

Give it a break ost Bois.

Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2020, 22:09 PMKubelecer

Those Ost T4 bonuses won't last, especially the cap/decap bonus. That thing is a nightmare to balance and has no place to be there in the first place.

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 11:18 AMProtos Angelus

Just ignore Korney, dweeb, nothing more. The HVAP that pierces buildings is useful only in a handful of situations mainly because it fires really slow. So your best chance is aiming at stationary vehicles being repaired or something, then there is the chance of it missing which I've been witness to plenty of times. Nothing more rage inducing than a KT being repaired, low HP and you fire that long range shot at it and it misses or explodes below it dealing no dmg. It's not worthless but extremely situational (+ randomness)

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 20:00 PMKoRneY

Well, I back the balance team for all of the heavy nerfs. There are way too many of them rolling around these days.

Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 20:52 PMRoastinGhost

I think the Sherman Dozer upgrade should raise target size back to 23.

Additionally, it should remove the hull mg, as it currently shoots through the blade.

Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 12:05 PMWiderstreit

"The changes will not apply to Tank Destroyers and specialist vehicles based on a medium tank chassis. Units like the Sherman Firefly and Sherman 105mm will remain the same due to their role."

Or what do you mean?
...

Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 06:53 AMAerohank

I am not a fan of the target size reduction of mediums. It makes units like the Puma, Stug3, and SU76 harder to use than they should be.

Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 12:32 PMthedarkarmadillo

Those units could easily get an accuracy buff y'know

Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 12:51 PMVipper

or instead of all these changes then 60 range TDs could get an accuracy nerf especially when vetted.