Profile of RussianHamster

Avatar Area

Offline Russian Federation
Posts: 88

General Information
Last Visit Time: 13 Jul 2021, 19:44 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/xamiak
Steam: 76561198008114814
Residence:

Russian Federation
Nationality:

Russian Federation
Timezone: Europe/Moscow
Game Name: RussianHamster

Show Latest Posts


Thread: December Balance Preview15 Dec 2017, 10:21 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2017, 04:31 AMsutr Yet they both lose to the panzer 4 in a straight up fight. Lets not forget the pak 40 is easily the best anti-tank gun in the game. The armor balance is in such a weird place. Panzer 4 beats sherman and cromwell in a straight up fight, but I think the cromwell is in a better place in terms of value then the sherman or panzer 4, and the sherman has a niche if I can get one quickly then when the axis armor hits the field I would never build one instead spam jackson, sometimes scott. I said earlier the panzer 4 is not what the axis need. They don't need an mbt that can beat other non-doc mbts. They need one that can fight infantry well. Really I think the ost armor problem can be summed as such, its too focused on fighting other armor and not enough killing infantry. Ost needs to lower their at capabilities and increase their ai abilities. Its so hard to micro 2 comets or croc with firefly. Kappa P4 and sherman 1v1 are the same tanks, what shows a 50-50 chances to destruction of each other, but sherman have more speed, can repair himself, have smoke and have AI-rounds. Cromwell have a smoke shell without cooldown and faster veterancy with officier. Control the one tiger are really easily, than controlling 2+ medium tanks, but its not so important in hight skill games and in current version of a game brits and USF have the same (crock, comets and pershing) heavy armour with the same difficulty to using as a axis tanks. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview15 Dec 2017, 00:25 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2017, 23:53 PMMarkedRaptor When you start saying "Well Axis (infantry) should be able to be upgraded and beat (allies)" you run into a problem of when exactly when would allies start winning? What is their high point? As allies I don't say "My ally (Tank) should be able to beat an axis (tank)" because I understand my infantry should be winning out at the end of the day. Wehr and OKW have a most expensive medium tanks, but cromwell and sherman much better and have more abilities than P4. In the same time allies have the best medium tank-hunters (say hello to firefly with tulips and su85 with unlimited sight), brits have a comets, what have an armor like a tiger, and have no limit to build. And dont forget about pershing who need much less experience to gain veterancy, than a tiger. Really unique things are the only KT, JT and Ferd, but they are really easy to destroy with a competent micro and tactics. Honestly I really much more like a allies tanks, then axis. In: Lobby
Thread: [DBP] Known bugs/issues in DBP v2.014 Dec 2017, 21:28 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2017, 20:48 PMSneakEye That is not a bug. The sandbags (and many other buildings) have a critical that destroys the object and your -hp action doesn't trigger the critical. Only weapons will trigger it. Looks like a bug. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [DBP] Known bugs/issues in DBP v2.014 Dec 2017, 20:01 PM Soviets sandbags bug - visual model destroyes before fysical: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/209539914 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Vet balance and caches14 Dec 2017, 18:56 PM +1 Only OKW dont have a cashes. If we debuffing okw vet to other faction lvl, so we need to remove all artificial brakes, like it was with 66% fuel inflow after UKF release. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December Balance Preview14 Dec 2017, 16:17 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2017, 15:58 PMMarkedRaptor I feel like Infantry that has double brens and double bars should, in the end, win against elite infantry with no weapon upgrades. I figured the point should be he spent 120 munitions for one squad to the squad right? I guess I can see the argument of "Why not just build obers who will win instead?" since they get a weapon upgrade. It's a valid point and that's the complication of having an elite unite without a weapon upgrade. It could be said the advantage is all the munitions you'd save and could use towards other things? Problem is what the best using for allies ammo is a bars and brens and they have a choice, while axis should to spent ammo for something another, because they have not weapons racks. Yes, you can give a LMG for grens and StG44 for volks, but 2 bars will be better and in mid/late game all players will have enough ammo for the second weapon for squads, but only allies can use it. The most of USF and UKF player prefer bars and brens, because it's better and safer than grenades - you can dodge grenades, but you cant dodge bar shoots. IMO, axis should have better veterancy than allies to counter bars and brens in the late game. P.S. This is not to mention what you can give a bar for every squad, includes pathfinders, airborne and rangers, while axis squads have only a defined choise. In: Lobby
Thread: [DBP] Known bugs/issues in DBP v2.013 Dec 2017, 16:31 PM M8 have not a anti-vecihle icon on top of the model, when button is active: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/209219790 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [DBP] Known bugs/issues in DBP v2.012 Dec 2017, 22:24 PM I'm not sure, but OKW sturmpio with shrek in the priority attack inf, and they start attacing tanks only after a direct order. Its not a DBP bug, i saw that issue in live ver of a game many times. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 20:53 PM The problem appears after cons vet3, when they get a -40%RA, so falls can kill a nonvet cons and vet2 cons, but killing a vet3 cons are very hard for them: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/209005451 Honestly falls still worse than most of elite inf even at long range, so think for yourself. In my opinion falls need to drop without FG42 (with rifles only, like it was in vCoH, and like it now happening with wehr stormtroopers) and get an upgrade to FG42 for 100 muni (with the FG42 buff, ofc). But thats are a serious changes and I don't think it's at all possible, even in the future. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 20:32 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 20:27 PMferwiner Yeah, I've seen most of them now. It shows that there really is something wrong with the ballance between these 2 units. Still, you should keep in mind that you are also using cons in the way they are ment to be used, while falls are being used like nobody ever does. I put falls into green cover and cons rushing them from long range, so i think it situation much better for falls, then for cons. Ofc we can use hold fire and nades, but I trying to demonstrate what vet5 falls DPS are really worse than have all elite units. Only falls lost to cons without hurra, cons lost a fight to PGs, stormtroopers, obers and have 50-50 chanses with fussiliers. To be honest, falls much better than cons without vet, but when we get falls into the game cons already will have vet (its a 3-4 mins of a game in my opinion). In: Lobby