Profile of Felinewolfie

I’m mostly just annoyed that developers do so much work to “invent” things to make the game unique and interesting when there are plenty of real life examples that go unused.

If you wanna put women in the game, make them Russian, not British or German. If you wanna our red dot sights on guns, then make a game set in the 2000’s or later. Seriously guys.... c’mon.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/vice_asset_uploader/files/1418339932jakub_ralski_project_1920_robots_poland_876_791_1418294620.jpg

This just in, they've added giant mecha to make the game more immersive.
PS: You can micro purchases to tailor the mecha's uniform to your taste.
It comes with a 12-yr old japanese girl school uniform.

http://orig09.deviantart.net/5f31/f/2014/345/e/3/o_a_m_grizelda_wrath_by_ku_on-d89ap3n.jpg

http://www.bostonbastardbrigade.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Izetta-2016.jpg

9: Izetta: The Last Witch

izetta-2016

Alternate history can be a tough thing to do, but Aija-do Animation Works' Izetta: The Last Witch brought to the table a beautiful (and often action-filled) tale of a princess and witch out to save their country. The World War II elements brought forth some chilling comparisons to the real fight and struggle, while sprinkling a surprisingly good amount of magic to both Princess Finé and Izetta. While the show struggled a bit in the middle to jam so much back story, the finale between Izetta and White Witch clone Sophie proved to be a gorgeous in-flight battle that led towards the finest WWII what-if scenario since Inglorious Basterds.

If guns were locked by team based then there would have to be mirror balancing for the guns. If the STG was the way it was and locked behind the axis faction only, then everyone would want to play axis instead of allied.

Also bf hasnt had faction based weaponry in a very long time and its never been an issue and there isnt really a point in arguing it now when compared to BF1/Bf3/4 which also had factions using weapons they would never use.

- STG44 as first weapon is to make players want to buy the game. I expect first weapon to NOT be STG44.
(At launch)
- BF1942 fixed this by giving allied assault the BAR (Everyone had a BAR) which had 100% same stats
as the STG44.
- Yea, mirror stats is needed, else everyone only wants to play Axis.
- True. It's interesting that it's mostly only WW2 that has all these purists.

A man named CODGUY just insulted the way modern FPS’ are being made.......
There’s at least a little bit of irony there. Lol

- He's special. Writes a lot on COH2 forums.
- He's said multiple times that he wishes the SS Obersoldaten and American GI would just
both be blue eyed blondes who lay down and start snuggling, look deeply into each other's
eyes and... well...

Remember Hollywood's Ghost in the Shell with Scarlet Johannson. No blacks, no asians, no women.
Just aryan albino versions of Dwayne Johnson. With the exact same face. Soft romantic moments.

Did you know CODGUY watches a LOT of Oiled Pro Wrestling?
No V in my games, he says. He's also campaigning for all females to be removed from all other games.
Inc Mario Bros. Sigh.

And if you still need to appease the customization desires of the masses,(even though individual customization of infantry weapons is basically unheard of in the real world, I didn’t put a scope on my M16A4, the armory did! Lol), you add in only real weapon upgrades that existed. Not an all out do whatever you want, but like the old CoD 4 system where you get only one add on or two if you sacrifice something else, like your special weapon(or a “Perk” in CoD 4).

Weapon upgrade examples, all real and not made up crap.
M1 Carbine:
M1A1 upgrade, folding stock makes handling faster and movement speed faster
M2 upgrade, full auto selector.
T30 (trials only, but plausible to be used.) M84 x4 power scope
M3 upgrade, active infrared night vision scope. Basically the same as the German Vampire scope, except it actually worked well and was issued in decent numbers on Okinawa to army troops. Also full auto, but we can omit that for balance. (Or hey a perk!)
30 round magazines
Bayonet
Improved sights, can act like a low zoom optic to show that the user has a better sights or maybe just an accuracy buff
Compensator, reduces recoil
Rifle grenade launcher, fires riflegrenades of various types
Flash hider, reduced flash and detection on the map.
Jungle style taped magazines, faster reload
Not all guns had this much level of customization in real life, but it’s just an example of what can be done without inventing fake “lense scopes” and “red dot style sights”.
Sorry. Rant over. Lol

- I agree. The upgrade system of COD4-COD5 is interesting.
I've been playing Red Orchestra 2 a lot. I wish they used a similar system.
1-2 STG44, 1-2 MG, 1-2 Snipers, the rest regular soldiers with a few engineers
and officers and Anti-tank soldiers

More immersive.
But someone mentioned that Battlefield is for the masses.
Not the purist.

Take a look at Battlefield 2's Forgotten Hope 2
There was also Battlegroup42 I think, a mod for Battlefield 1942 that was nice.

DICE creative director Lars Gustavsson spoke to Gamespot after the show, he said that there was an "extremely big push" from within DICE to get a Battle Royale mode added to the game.

Sadly, I am SO thinking of DOW3.
DOTA2 popular? An extremely big push from within Sega to get a DOTA2 mode
added to the game.

Fortnite : Paid for PVE COOP. Bataille Royale mode added free.
DOW3 : DOTA2 is free, paid with cosmetic microtransaction?
We'll make DOTA3 cost 71$ at launch, AND will have microtransactions.
BF:V : We'll make the game cost ~60-90$ at launch AND add Bataille Royale
and then add microtransactions.

Dota2 and Fortnite are insane because they're well made AND free.
Tons of players. Who then are happy to pay for cosmetic upgrades.

I feel dead games are those who 1) Have cost of AAA game, then
ALSO want micro transaction revenue.

DOW3 would have ruled if it had been as the name says : DOW3.
But instead it was 71$ weaker DOTA with empty servers.
BF:V wants to do exactly the same thing. They're totally rule as BF1942#2.
Instead they want to be Fortnite#2 (PubG and Fortnite will have combined
8 billions this year?) Who wouldn't want a piece of that?!

Expensive 71$ DOTA clone won't make the DOTA crowds come rushing.

I'm surprised they don't ask high entry price purchase, then monthly
subscription and THEN on top of that microtransactions
(Looking at you, Activision-owned Blizzard).
(Which oddly, has begun a severe decline).

I understand game design costs money, but all these people are doing
are cloning each other while trying to gouge more and more out of an
ever-shrinking pie.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/CL_S_Nq9ybU/hqdefault.jpg

Hello! I heard you liked WarHammer 40,000 ?
Here is poor dota clone for 5x more money cost and empty servers

Hello! I heard you really wanted WW2 Battlefield ?
Here is poor Fortnite clone for 5x more money cost and empty servers

This game is sooo horrible.

You can get all kind of weapon no matter that side are you playing on what map are you playing (Narvik 1941 and you can be a british soldier with stg44), tanks are horribly horribly fast and those uniforms...

I know, it;s not realistic and historical game but totall opposite of this isn't good eighter. You don't feel at all the climate of ww2 - it could be simple another modern warfare style game...

Just hope this game won't sell and it will have horrible reviews - that may stop this nonsens...

**** I really enjoyed it. I've been waiting for BF1942 to be back for ... ... 19-20 yrs?
What killed BF1942 back then were the DLC that while nice kept cutting the community as
you could only access the new maps if you paid, and those who had bought all found almost
no one to play... I miss there being AI however that you could do coop vs
- As for Just another modern warfare style : If it ain't broke don't fix it.

I don't get why every one is ranting that hard about the fucking historical accuracy. Apart from that (and yes I admit it feels kinda weird at times) this is exactly what I expected from BF V. I had fun when playing the beta and it gave the good old Battlefield feeling again.
Yes the STG is pretty OP but this gn is so much fun tbh I loved it
I am really considering to buy it!

- I bought the game already. And Deluxe version, too.
- EA wants people to buy this, so STG available immediately. Won't the case
at release, it'll be Assault weapon #4. So you need to grind to it. In BF1942
the assault class either all had the BAR or the STG44.
- Exactly this is exactly what I expected from BF V as well, and I had a blast!

+1

I liked the Beta. Okay. I dont like Narvik (the map isnt good) but i think BF V is a solide and fun game.
I cant see all this "historical problems". Sure. Anyone can use any weapon because of balance and the "i want to unlock weapons" mentality but hey. It is a game. When StG is my preferred weapons i will be happy when i could use it all the time.
I cant wait for the release

- Aye. Also, they found people would just switch to German all the time because... STG44 (And MG34
before they removed it from the BETA). Basically, this is the route COD5 World-at-war chose.
And the point was not unlock as US or Japanese or American. You followed a unified Assault/Medic/
Engineer/Recon unlock path no matter which faction you played, because... axis fanboi and if you
got all your unlocks as Germany, who would be crazy enough to play as Allied?

They could give BAR and STG44 the same as they did in BF1942, but people would just bitch anyways.
- World of tanks, War Thunder does it this way, too. You got Germans on all teams, Soviets on all
teams, Americans on all teams. Fixes the wanting to be on Team A or B.

I kinda had fun in the beta and the game has potential, but I do not understand how you consider buying this on release.

The beta had massive problems and bugs, tons of unfinished features (like tanks that get stuck on indestructible cars) and balance issues (planes, revives, TTK, attrition etc). Graphics are arguably worse than BF1. Soldiers blend in too well and there's tons of visual disturbance (like super dark and super light areas next to each other). The sound is horrible right now because you can't hear things up close (like footsteps) and there's barely any ambient sounds (gunshots in the distance). Running around doesn't feel like there's a war going on at all. Too few vehicles for a Battlefield game. The game lacks character. Gun/vehicle upgrade trees and the UI are a total mess. The bleed out / spawn mechanics and UI are badly designed (like why do I need to press a button to see the map?).

This game is not ready for release anytime soon.

- I pre-purchased because I've been waiting 20 yrs for this game and I want to encourage it.
I also wanted to play in the closed alphas and open beta.
- Game was amazing. I even chucked my old PC and got a Ryzen god to play it
It was so smooth, I cried! Only 2 factions and 2 maps... er, no. This game
is NOT ready. But I want it to be Battlefield 1942 #2 so bad, I could cry!

- I want to drive T34's, damn it I want StuIIIGs!
- Shermans! (With offensive smoke projectors, ahah@COH2
- Bleed out being badly designed, someone said he didn't want the count down bleed
and just wanted to auto respawn immediately. So they described to him that he'd
lose 5000 spawn points from his team with the first molotov At that point,
just put both teams in a broom closet with friendly fire odd y'know?

6 planes, halftracks (why german only?), kettenkrad (why german only?), PAK40 (Why German only?)
Flak20 (why German only?) Valentine, Churchill, Croc, Panzer 4, Tiger (in 1940?), SturmTiger (in 1940?)
Wasn't bad for starters...

But this game was supposed to be released in late October. Too soon.

I want this game to have as many maps and vehicles and success as BF1 if not more
I hope it doesn't turn into another DOW3

PS: I deserve a medal for finally figuring out the multi-thread reply feature.
I've been here... what? Since 2012 or so ? 6 yrs? More?! About time I got it. Lol
ie: 30x replies in a row man.

Since you only play PvE, I would echo tightrope and zombifrancis and say just mod the game or find mods that you like. Balance is never really going to conform to PvE because that's not what the vast majority of players feel is necessary.

=============

- What is needed is 2 different balance veins.
One for PVE and one for PVP. The only balance that will ever work is copy pasting all stats.
The game losing it's flavor and soul more and more is exactly because things are moving ever
closer, ever closer to mirror stat balance.

You know it's true. And that's where things will end up.

You talking about 'what the vast majority of players want'... different people want
different things. And ignoring what some people want will simply fragment the community
further and end up killing it for good. Adding options, not destroying them is what's needed.