Battlefield V WW2 - SEPT 4 - Open beta.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 20:29 PMFichtenMoped

I get where you are coming from but don't you think it would be shittier gameplay wise if you were forced to use weapons and vehicles depending on a map all the time?

Again: Historical accuracy doesn't really matter to me when it comes to multiplayer gameplay tbh and I seem to fail to see this argument when people weren't complaining about automatic rifles in BF1 half as bad

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 20:17 PMFelinewolfie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Norway

In March and April 1940, British plans for an invasion of Norway were prepared, mainly in order to reach and destroy the Swedish iron ore mines in Gällivare. It was hoped that this would divert German forces away from France, and open a war front in south Sweden.[2]

Moving east, the Germans were surprised when the British started to abandon Narvik on 3 June. By that time the German offensive in France had progressed to such an extent that the British could no longer afford any commitment in Norway, and the 25,000 Allied troops were evacuated from Narvik only 10 days after their victory.

*** The Narvik map is based on ~April 1940.
: MG42 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG_42 In service 1942–present
: MP40(Kinda)
: G43 (1943)
: STG44(Even KB2 prototype is 1942)
: Tiger (1942)
: SturmTiger (1944-1945)
: AT Churchill (Prototype, and, seriously?)
: Valentine tank : n service 1940–60 (Ok, this one works)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill_tank : 1941
The second major improved Churchill, the Mk VII, was first used in the Battle of Normandy in 1944. The Mk VII improved on the already heavy armour of the Churchill with a wider chassis and the British 75 mm gun, which had been introduced on the Mk VI. (1944 for MK7)
: Churchill Mk VII (A22F) (1,600 produced, together with Mark VIII) 1945 !!!! (Crocodile)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb
: The first V-1 was launched at London on 13 June 1944,[6] !!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bren_light_machine_gun
In service 1938–2006 - This one works okay

... It drives... me... nuts
Different maps being set in different years, ought to have different weapons

Methinks

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 23:21 PMTobis

I was more annoyed with the stg being the starting weapon because it's literally the best possible gun to use by nature of it being an assault rifle. On the class that is anti-infantry AND anti-tank they have an anti-everything weapon good at all ranges. Incredibly silly from a balance point, unless they make the gun uselessly bad.

Battlefield has never been a realistic game; I just want a WW2 sandbox game where I can pew pew with cool weapons and tanks.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 23:21 PMTobis

I was more annoyed with the stg being the starting weapon because it's literally the best possible gun to use by nature of it being an assault rifle. On the class that is anti-infantry AND anti-tank they have an anti-everything weapon good at all ranges. Incredibly silly from a balance point, unless they make the gun uselessly bad.

Battlefield has never been a realistic game; I just want a WW2 sandbox game where I can pew pew with cool weapons and tanks.

Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2018, 17:19 PMTheGentlemenTroll

Sounds like the m16 in bf3 all over again.

STG44 should most definitely be the last unlock, maybe they are just trying to balance the gun and will shift it to max unlock on release (hopefully).

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 12:21 PMFichtenMoped

I don't get why every one is ranting that hard about the fucking historical accuracy. Apart from that (and yes I admit it feels kinda weird at times) this is exactly what I expected from BF V. I had fun when playing the beta and it gave the good old Battlefield feeling again.

Yes the Stg is pretty OP but this gn is so much fun tbh I loved it

I am really considering to buy it!

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:11 PMLordRommel

+1

I liked the Beta. Okay. I dont like Narvik (the map isnt good) but i think BF V is a solide and fun game.
I cant see all this "historical problems". Sure. Anyone can use any weapon because of balance and the "i want to unlock weapons" mentality but hey. It is a game. When StG is my preferred weapons i will be happy when i could use it all the time.

I cant wait for the release

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:23 PMSander93

I kinda had fun in the beta and the game has potential, but I do not understand how you consider buying this on release. The beta had massive problems and bugs, tons of unfinished features (like tanks that get stuck on indestructible cars) and balance issues (planes, revives, TTK, attrition etc). This game is not ready for release anytime soon.

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:25 PMFichtenMoped

That's what Betas are there for man

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 12:07 PMStark

This game is sooo horrible.

You can get all kind of weapon no matter that side are you playing on what map are you playing (Narvik 1941 and you can be a british soldier with stg44), tanks are horribly horribly fast and those uniforms...

I know, it;s not realistic and historical game but totall opposite of this isn't good eighter. You don't feel at all the climate of ww2 - it could be simple another modern warfare style game...

Just hope this game won't sell and it will have horrible reviews - that may stop this nonsens...

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 12:21 PMFichtenMoped

I don't get why every one is ranting that hard about the fucking historical accuracy. Apart from that (and yes I admit it feels kinda weird at times) this is exactly what I expected from BF V. I had fun when playing the beta and it gave the good old Battlefield feeling again.
Yes the STG is pretty OP but this gn is so much fun tbh I loved it
I am really considering to buy it!

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:11 PMLordRommel

+1

I liked the Beta. Okay. I dont like Narvik (the map isnt good) but i think BF V is a solide and fun game.
I cant see all this "historical problems". Sure. Anyone can use any weapon because of balance and the "i want to unlock weapons" mentality but hey. It is a game. When StG is my preferred weapons i will be happy when i could use it all the time.
I cant wait for the release

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:23 PMSander93

I kinda had fun in the beta and the game has potential, but I do not understand how you consider buying this on release.

The beta had massive problems and bugs, tons of unfinished features (like tanks that get stuck on indestructible cars) and balance issues (planes, revives, TTK, attrition etc). Graphics are arguably worse than BF1. Soldiers blend in too well and there's tons of visual disturbance (like super dark and super light areas next to each other). The sound is horrible right now because you can't hear things up close (like footsteps) and there's barely any ambient sounds (gunshots in the distance). Running around doesn't feel like there's a war going on at all. Too few vehicles for a Battlefield game. The game lacks character. Gun/vehicle upgrade trees and the UI are a total mess. The bleed out / spawn mechanics and UI are badly designed (like why do I need to press a button to see the map?).

This game is not ready for release anytime soon.

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:33 PMSander93

And you honestly believe they will fix these absolutely massive core issues in one month before release? Stop kidding yourself. Do you also buy a new car without the engine and wheels and then happily wait a year before the garage slowly patches it together into a working vehicle?

As I said this game has potential and I want to like it, but it's obvious it isn't ready for release for another 6 months.

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 13:33 PMSander93

And you honestly believe they will fix these absolutely massive core issues in one month before release? Stop kidding yourself. Do you also buy a new car without the engine and wheels and then happily wait a year before the garage slowly patches it together into a working vehicle?

As I said this game has potential and I want to like it, but it's obvious it isn't ready for release for another 6 months.

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2018, 12:07 PMStark

This game is sooo horrible.

You can get all kind of weapon no matter that side are you playing on what map are you playing (Narvik 1941 and you can be a british soldier with stg44), tanks are horribly horribly fast and those uniforms...

I know, it;s not realistic and historical game but totall opposite of this isn't good eighter. You don't feel at all the climate of ww2 - it could be simple another modern warfare style game...

Just hope this game won't sell and it will have horrible reviews - that may stop this nonsens...