Battlefield V WW2 - SEPT 4 - Open beta.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
- Sept 4 for Premium members
- Sept 4 for pre-purchasers
- Sept 6 for all others
- Runs until Sept 11.
Who wants 5 to 7 of free Battlefield V play?
Only thing is you need to update your video drivers in most cases.
Posts: 1838 | Subs: 17
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
I'll be playing it today for sure in a few hours. Installing it now .
Installed it last night.
Sooo excited. Missed out on last 2 closed alphas.
So went nuts and upgraded PC to a Ryzen 8/16T @64 GB monster
This time, I am ready!!!
PS: I want T34s. Lol
! Aren't you British?
I wish they used less OP tanks than SturmTiger lol.
Then they'll need to go a-nerfing them when they should have used less OP vehicles
to begin with. Something like StuIII-E perhaps?
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 545
Nice! Finally a chance to get my hands on it. Will definately try it out. Can you tell me anything about what's included? Like maps modes etc
Unless things changed it’s Rotterdam and Narvik for maps and one runs the new game mode other one is stock BF modes.
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
are there still thos big circles above every enemy you see?
They said no more hunting Doritos.
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
are there still thos big circles above every enemy you see?
No, it was a bug that was fixed apparently.
I'm having fun so far, stg seems super OP. Or maybe smgs just suck.
Posts: 2066
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
No, it was a bug that was fixed apparently.
I'm having fun so far, stg seems super OP. Or maybe smgs just suck.
- You, sir, are not allowed to play. I am stuck at work, still.
- They tweaked STG vs SMG play. SMG had too much range. STG now
do much less at short range.
Ge43 : 2/3 Rifle, 1/3 SMG
STG44: 1/3 Rifle, 2/3 SMG
MP40 : 0/3 Rifle, 3/3 SMG
SMGs were actually BUFFED in some context. This has less to do
with the actual weapon, and more with how you use them. It's more realistic now.
No more 'perfect at all ranges' now
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Great! Can't wait to play like an Asian or African American female Wehrmacht Soldier in the battle of Rotterdam in 1940!! I hope they have pink weapons too! Hihi!
I'll be playing a white male 8 foot tall albino german.
I'll have rouge on my cheeks and giganormous size 32 clown shoes.
And a huge flag on my back that says 'Death to all untermennen' (Anyone under 8 feet tall)
expect a look of friendly fire
My camo pattern will be swastika. On helmet, on sleeves, on collar, on chest, on pants, on socks,
on 32-sized clown shoes that go honk.
Maybe something about white power, being a cisgendered male albino.
Gotta love how far you can edit your character
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
No, it was a bug that was fixed apparently.
I'm having fun so far, stg seems super OP. Or maybe smgs just suck.
STG seems like its going to be a problem weapon like the postbuff BAR or the model 10 prenerf for BF1. There always has to be one to two guns that is/are nuts in a BF game, its the cycle of life.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Unfortunatly I dont have a computer in college capable of running the game so Ill have to miss out
STG seems like its going to be a problem weapon like the postbuff BAR or the model 10 prenerf for BF1. There always has to be one to two guns that is/are nuts in a BF game, its the cycle of life.
========
- You have the wrong priorities! Sell kidneys and buy a kickass gaming PC!!! NOW!
- I've always felt weird with :
: COD:WAW : Weapons have nothing to do with the army you are in. Japanese have BARs, and USF have MG42.
: No class limits. Fighting in open maps vs 32 enemy snipers is... brutal.
I wish they'd make it like RO2.
Limit on officers, engineers, Anti-tank, MGs and snipers and etc.
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
STG seems like its going to be a problem weapon like the postbuff BAR or the model 10 prenerf for BF1. There always has to be one to two guns that is/are nuts in a BF game, its the cycle of life.
It also bugs me that the most advanced gun in the war is the default starting weapon
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
It also bugs me that the most advanced gun in the war is the default starting weapon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Norway
In March and April 1940, British plans for an invasion of Norway were prepared, mainly in order to reach and destroy the Swedish iron ore mines in Gällivare. It was hoped that this would divert German forces away from France, and open a war front in south Sweden.[2]
Moving east, the Germans were surprised when the British started to abandon Narvik on 3 June. By that time the German offensive in France had progressed to such an extent that the British could no longer afford any commitment in Norway, and the 25,000 Allied troops were evacuated from Narvik only 10 days after their victory.
*** The Narvik map is based on ~April 1940.
: MG42 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG_42 In service 1942–present
: MP40(Kinda)
: G43 (1943)
: STG44(Even KB2 prototype is 1942)
: Tiger (1942)
: SturmTiger (1944-1945)
: AT Churchill (Prototype, and, seriously?)
: Valentine tank : n service 1940–60 (Ok, this one works)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill_tank : 1941
The second major improved Churchill, the Mk VII, was first used in the Battle of Normandy in 1944. The Mk VII improved on the already heavy armour of the Churchill with a wider chassis and the British 75 mm gun, which had been introduced on the Mk VI. (1944 for MK7)
: Churchill Mk VII (A22F) (1,600 produced, together with Mark VIII) 1945 !!!! (Crocodile)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb
: The first V-1 was launched at London on 13 June 1944,[6] !!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bren_light_machine_gun
In service 1938–2006 - This one works okay
... It drives... me... nuts
Different maps being set in different years, ought to have different weapons
Methinks
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
- Germans copied SVT-40 and made the Ge43
Soviets captured STG44 and made the AK47
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Norway
In March and April 1940, British plans for an invasion of Norway were prepared, mainly in order to reach and destroy the Swedish iron ore mines in Gällivare. It was hoped that this would divert German forces away from France, and open a war front in south Sweden.[2]
Moving east, the Germans were surprised when the British started to abandon Narvik on 3 June. By that time the German offensive in France had progressed to such an extent that the British could no longer afford any commitment in Norway, and the 25,000 Allied troops were evacuated from Narvik only 10 days after their victory.
*** The Narvik map is based on ~April 1940.
: MG42 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG_42 In service 1942–present
: MP40(Kinda)
: G43 (1943)
: STG44(Even KB2 prototype is 1942)
: Tiger (1942)
: SturmTiger (1944-1945)
: AT Churchill (Prototype, and, seriously?)
: Valentine tank : n service 1940–60 (Ok, this one works)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill_tank : 1941
The second major improved Churchill, the Mk VII, was first used in the Battle of Normandy in 1944. The Mk VII improved on the already heavy armour of the Churchill with a wider chassis and the British 75 mm gun, which had been introduced on the Mk VI. (1944 for MK7)
: Churchill Mk VII (A22F) (1,600 produced, together with Mark VIII) 1945 !!!! (Crocodile)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb
: The first V-1 was launched at London on 13 June 1944,[6] !!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bren_light_machine_gun
In service 1938–2006 - This one works okay
... It drives... me... nuts
Different maps being set in different years, ought to have different weapons
Methinks
I get where you are coming from but don't you think it would be shittier gameplay wise if you were forced to use weapons and vehicles depending on a map all the time?
Again: Historical accuracy doesn't really matter to me when it comes to multiplayer gameplay tbh and I seem to fail to see this argument when people weren't complaining about automatic rifles in BF1 half as bad
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
In service 1942–1970s (saw limited use during the Vietnam War[6])
Ahhhh
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
I get where you are coming from but don't you think it would be shittier gameplay wise if you were forced to use weapons and vehicles depending on a map all the time?
Again: Historical accuracy doesn't really matter to me when it comes to multiplayer gameplay tbh and I seem to fail to see this argument when people weren't complaining about automatic rifles in BF1 half as bad
Drove me nuts in COD:WAW (5) when USA had Japanese rifles vs Germans with british rifles...
I'm more in the RO2 (Red Orchestra 2) school of thought.
Limit# of Snipers. Heavy Machine guns, etc.
No limit on bolt rifles.
Some maps have STG44 (KB2) and some others don't. Etc.
No BAR on German-Soviet maps. Etc
Sorry. I'm a purist
I don't mind black women, thought
Livestreams
42 | |||||
267 | |||||
155 | |||||
6 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM