Profile of Stug life

If they have PTRS, they are AT squad and vet does literally nothing for them except a very tiny amount of received accuracy. In fact, I don't know if there is a squad scaling as badly in the whole game as PTRS penals.

on one hand, PF are the bests scalling infantry in the world

on the other penal have the worse scaling

both unit have almost the same vet and similar ai dps (g43 p fusi are a bit better at close range and on the move but cost more), and even with ptrs they still works well vs AI unlike pfusi with sherck (the penal ptrs have -40 acc but they gain it back with vet as they have 60% bonus, while still having 4 stv)

Sorry to burst your bubble, but a singular instance of bad RNG doesn't magically switch stats around.

the irony of this is palpable

1 yeah, more expensive units tend to be better then cheaper ones
2 well, if we ignore existence of soviets(airborne FRP), USF(ambu), OKW(spio crates, opel blitz) and Ost(luftwaffe healing crates), you are right
4 not as of latest patch
5 check the stats, difference is pretty significant
6 you want to deny that its beyond retarded to give IS piats?
7 because that's how faction was made, also trenches were soft removed from the game
8 hardly, not useless, but "very fucking good" is the last phrase I'd use to describe it
9 yeaaah, no - and 20% difference is not "almost the same"
10 thompson is nowhere close to STG, its SMG and pretty useless at long range. They are also more expensive then AGs and AGs scale better for the role with 6th man and better vet

kat did u read what was written before ? he said ass gren are the same, so don't turn back the point to me

read the whole post , not only thing u can take out of context

1. They underperform by a lot as a 4 man so bolster is a must, or they have to be 5 man default.
2. Beside medical supply, UKF have the most expensive medic bunker and dont have access to mobile reinforce.
3. "Cool" artillery which can only hit static target as big as a building and require the unit to be deadly close to target.
4. Their base price and reinforce price is calculated around being a 5 mab squad, not 4 man.
5. A single bren is wost than 1 mg42 so 2 bren is required to bring then up to equal, more expensive but not significantly better.
6. They dont have buil in snare and giving them PIAT is a waste, sacrifice AI power.
7. They dont have T0 engineer unit to buil cover for them at the stat and being fucked without cover.
8. Tommy's nade is standard frag nade and has a minimum range. Gamon bomb again only work with static target.
9. They get debufff out of cover and close to non existence moving dps while the faction doesn't have a cqb - moving dps unit to fill the gap.
10. If you mean assault sections then good new is they is they just about ass gren lv but cone latter.
11. LOL Universal carrier is durable.

Are you sure you fully understand all the thing you are talking?

1 nope they are better gren for 270 mp now
2 ur point ? other factions don't even have aoe healing , IS get infinite uses after 30 mun for an aoe mobile heal
3 like any off map ? it's literally an in map a call in for cheap but u need to get in range to use it
4 nope their base price is calculated by their 4 men squad, they are the best long range main line in th game
5 >not significantly better
bren has 2 less dps at long range and 1 less at close range, so when u have 2 bren u get 5 more dps at long and 3 at close
6 not having a snare does not make them useless or pgren by ur logic would not exist, or RE zook or sturm pio or pfusi
7 but why both trenches and green cover ? are u saying it's mandatory ? why rifle don't have them or volks ?
8 still a very fucking good nade for a long range unit
9 this might surprise u but RE are very good at cqc and have about the same dps as ass green while moving (5 vs 4)
10 they are much better than ass gren , they have Thompson too, do ass green get some stg ?
11 compare to any t0 light vehicle even doc one, it has the most armor and has the best lmg

yea maybe keep the zook ?