Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: Gameplay opposite of forum discussion29 Oct 2016, 17:29 PM Say what you want last tourney 4-1 for ally an overwhelming victory In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Volkgrenadiers Kar98 is too accurate27 Oct 2016, 07:50 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2016, 14:09 PMVipper You are actually missing the point the ST44 upgrade as some others make the VG perform much better mid to close while they retain an slightly improves their long range DPs. The LMG upgrade for Gren is much better because they continue to have the same role as along range infantry. As I also explained the same problem exist with riflemen getting lmgs. This is not a specific faction problem is problem with giving wrong weapon upgrades to units with specific roles. Gren and VG are designed to fight riflemen and conscripts far and tommies close to mid. By giving the ST44 in its current form one is actually messing with the relative positioning of units. A upgrade that would increase their far DPS more and their mid close less would be far more suited. One could just call it ST44 on "single shot" mod. like bar ? Cause stg upgrade is a bar upgrade litteraly the same (or bit worse cause you lose 1 more rifle) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [OKW] Do they fixed medic buff?27 Oct 2016, 07:39 AM Did..... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger Impending nerfs26 Oct 2016, 06:22 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Oct 2016, 20:59 PMIamCat You would have to be a huge MORON, to think the sturmtiger isn't op. In any world, form or shape, how would anyone possibly think that this thing is ok. Ok, so somehow, it's not fine when the ISU152 is able to instawipe squad, for 720/260 fuel, but when it's for OKW to get a weapon that can both INSTANTLY kill tanks and infantry: totally fine ! Get fu***** real, this think is broken af. infact every tournament was won with this commander 100% win rate especially the last tourney .... right ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volkgrenadiers Kar98 is too accurate26 Oct 2016, 06:06 AM To tell you the truth volks were worse than cons before and ober where strong but thanks to the troll allys ober got nerfed too much giving okw no ai then they bufffed the volks to decent lvl and make them more expensive they have really bad close range dps only at long range they are strong Btw what do you mean reduce the mid range distance to 17-18 it litteraly makes no sense In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger Impending nerfs21 Oct 2016, 16:38 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2016, 16:24 PMSirWinshue HueHue You didn't get the point. One shotting mediums is wrong, even if the SturmTiger costed 1500 fuel. that can be okay but why make it cost 240 fuel too and nerfing his hp ? there is no reson to do it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger Impending nerfs21 Oct 2016, 16:22 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2016, 16:18 PMSirWinshue HueHue But I am not the only victim. Vet is completely irrelevant as it won't reach vet 2 or above in most games due to the high XP requirement. So getting a new one is perfectly OK. Yes it has to be high, but not as high as oneshotting tanks. Not to mention the cheesy "threads removed, luls" crit Because as it is, it can just stand in front of mutiple ATs, wipe its target and reverse back. It is The IS2 doesn't hit anything and the ISU needs too much babysitting and is slower than a turtle fanboy not happy about 70% win rate still want more (btw i dont see the avre nerf too why ?"bb-bb-but avre has less range and damage" still reload faster and more total defense ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Re-distributing the power of USF20 Oct 2016, 08:21 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2016, 05:57 AMSvanh Oddly enough, the site messes up the veterancy requirements for Riflemen. It doesn't list a vet 1 value and insists that the vet 2 and vet 3 requirements are 560 and 1120 respectively. Here are the Riflemen veterancy requirements from the tools: vet 1 = 560 vet 2 = 1120 vet 3 = 2576 Grenadiers for comparison: vet 1 = 480 vet 2 = 960 vet 3 = 1920 Allied unit tend to vet faster cause of the high cost and reinforce cost of axis unit so they get more vet as they do damage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Re-distributing the power of USF19 Oct 2016, 08:23 AM Nerf: 1 good but if we remove 2 lmg what Ming said is fine 2 mortar should be a 60 mm 60 range 240 mp copy of the su mortar with flare at vet 1 3 Stuart need to cost more mp (thoghether with all LT) and remove blind Buff 1 buff the penetrating round damage to 300% not 100% 2 good 3 airborne has a lot of ai just make p-47 fire 4 rockets and in a tighter area so it hit the target 4 just give the ai ap round 5-6-7 good I would suggest 8 reduce pack howy mp to 340 and pop cap to 9 to so people will not cry for the lack of indirect fire 9 buff Scot range by 10/20 and give it heat barrage at vet 2 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Dear Relic Please19 Oct 2016, 07:51 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2016, 07:36 AMAradan Where is problem? Game never was more ballanced. In past was axis easy mod. http://coh2chart.com/ charth means almost nothing because the matching system make you play with less skilled people if you lose and contrary if you win To get the real balance look too 10 win rate every faction (and win streak) and more importantly the tournament (wich was devastating for axis with 4-1 ally win) No the game needs balance (just to let you know that during tiger ace and op Sherman charts win rate still remained around 50/60%) In: COH2 Balance