Profile of Stug life

Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2020, 16:36 PMJae For Jett

If only you tested it a 22nd time, you would have seen that he was right the entire time.

Also, he never said it was on front armor, or that the pershing was stationary. I think the pgrens might be able to pull some wins if the pershing is facing its rear and moving for every shot, so that might be what CODGUY was doing with his pershing in his story.

Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2020, 20:00 PMSander93

All that you're explaining here is how the Kubel is a nice early to mid game unit (when the IR HT doesn't exist) and how the IR HT will be a way better late game recon tool when all that's needed is clear vision of a certain area of the map, like a VP area. Not how one is better than the other.

Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2020, 05:56 AMSuperHansFan

I agree let's nerf Jagdpanzer and bring its popcap into line with firefly

It's criminally low despite proving better DPS

Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2020, 22:15 PMSander93

For the record, Tightrope's tests aren't very conclusive because the Tiger I has always been weak against spread out squads because of its relatively small AOE. Its strength comes from high ROF, getting a lot of shots into clumped up squads (which happens a lot in real matches) which is impossible to test outside of getting a ton of real games in. The adjustments are minor, only geared towards reducing the OHK potential so that it doesn't wipe as much, so overal performance in a real match should still be good. The adjustments are not meant to make the Tiger (and the other heavies) necessarily weaker, but rather to make it (them) less oppressive. Heavies are still meant to be viable units.

AOE is hard to adjust because we have to basically guess the values because there is no way to standardize the values into some kind of performance gauge. Only the "live test" will show how it ultimately performs and if it needs any further adjustments.