Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion14 Aug 2019, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 19:14 PMSander93 That's what we're going to need test games and feedback for. We could still do lots of things with the tech split, i.e. remove Hetzer and lower the cost of the first half, or allow Obers upgrades, or allow Ostwind/Jagdpanzer IV, but we need to see the new system and its timings in action first. try a tech cost of 60 fuel that u can actually build without the need of other truck, with just obers and JP4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion14 Aug 2019, 19:05 PM well, don't u still need tier 1 or 2 as they don't mention it being unlocked, so u can't actually rush them, so u get basically penals when they get tier 4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SEPTEMBER 2019 PATCH PREVIEW14 Aug 2019, 18:53 PM i still think this will not fix the partisan reinforce problem, allow cons to merge in to them at least In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion14 Aug 2019, 18:46 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 18:43 PMelchino7 If they are going to lock the JPIV as well behind the other tanks i think they could take a little more risk in making Obers arrive way faster, specially without the LMG. Quite a lot of changes to grasp but i do indeed like that there are plenty of QOL + things which were long overdue been touched. if at least they came with lmg it would have a point but thye are basically more expsive penal with bit more damage with 95 tech cost to unlock, only them In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion14 Aug 2019, 18:38 PM can i ask what the point of this ? Cost from 200MP/120 to 100/80; unlocks Obersoldaten and the doctrinal Hetzer; Obersoldaten upgrades locked behind Panzer Authorization. nobody is gonna build it for penals for 80 fuel (mg is still locked in the last tier) as they are literally the only unit in that tier In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RAKETENWERFER, Stay or Change. What say you?14 Aug 2019, 16:17 PM usf at gun clone with soviet camo SPEED and first shoot out of stealth+ 200% pen and acc In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why USF so bad in tournaments?14 Aug 2019, 07:29 AM How to spot a fan boy: “cons are better than rifle” In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen need a buff or Volks need a nerf?14 Aug 2019, 07:27 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 02:39 AMCODGUY So couple things I learned so far: Volks vet is much better than Riflemen and it comes sooner. Riflmen have to vet up to get something they should have anyway (AT snare) and get no combat bonuses until Vet 2 which again is a very slow process. Riflemen are less effective than Volks at long range, although this isn't really surprising. You know maybe the solution is just to give them the snare already then add an actual combat bonus at Vet 1? I've always thought Strumpioneers shouldn't be a starting unit either. Should be a T2 unit like Royal Engineers which aren't nearly as good but for some reason they're a Platoon CP unit. yea no are an idiot, u learned nothing, rifle have better vet tan volks I posted it 3 time already y with the vet bonuses u keep ignoring it Ur opinions value nothing here as u are full blown fan boy who ignores stats and invents patch changes Rifle have same dps as volks at long range as showed before, u keep ignoring it cause u are a fan boy again RE cost 210 mp , sturm cost 300 mp again I think u lack the basic human features to compare numbers u don’t understand that 2>1 so u make mistakes like saying volks have better vet when they have 0.77 RA at vet 5 whole rifle have 0.61 at vet 3 and that RE should be better than sturm when they cost 90 less mp In: COH2 Balance
Thread: StuG life not viable13 Aug 2019, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2019, 22:04 PMMaret 50+10=? +20% accuracy...very fun for unit that already have 100% chance to hit on any medium while stationary. Now you could be like sherman on moving. But without turret. I already told, no any nation in-game, don't have T3 armor long-range unit, that hardcountering mediums. Soft counter (su-76) have, non hardcounter. STUG ideal - 50 range (20% more than any medium), killer of all meduims and LV. 175 far pen - 46% chance to hit is-2, 64% for kv. And you still have +10 range against them. Kite. STUG works, don't disturb it. the 20 % accuracy is there to counter light vehicle and same for the 10 or 5 timed range so it actually counters AEC ,SU 76 and Stuart, more accuracy is important vs LV and the 5 or 10 range would help it catch up to su 76 or aec which either have more range or same or help catch up the Stuart running away , it's timed after all not permanet the stugs needs to counter those too as there is no unit like puma for osther non doc In: COH2 Balance
Thread: StuG life not viable13 Aug 2019, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2019, 21:48 PMMaret Not, because with this ability you could counter with 90 fuel T3 (1 tier below) unit top-tiers allies TD (add to it scopes in some docs and you will get backsitting cancer). Just imagine if soviets for t-3476 will ask heat rounds? 90 fuel medium that with ability can kill 120 fuel medium - balance? Want long-range non-doc unit against ally TD - pak. it would be timed like the usf at gun not a permanent one something like + 10/5 rnage and 20% more accuracy for 15 seconds In: COH2 Balance