Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: USF Jeep5 Mar 2019, 15:59 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 15:36 PMEtherealDragon .. I've rarely seen WC51 used in late game because they almost never get rebuilt so I don't see the point in removing something that rarely gets used... How many kubels to you see rebuilt? (or even built...) When the unit occupied a commander slot one could try to justify it because of it. Since then it was buffer further and merge with m3: • WC51: 4 to 3 (pop) WC-51 -Can now be built from the Rifle Command with a build time of 22. -MG cooldown duration from 1.25/2 to 1.25/1.5 -MG Rate of fire multiplier from 1/0.8333/0.6667 to 1/1/1 -HMG upgrade cost from 60 to 45 -Veterancy requirement from 360/720/1440 to 300/600/1200 -Can now capture territory; Capture and decapture rate of 1. -Mark Target and 155mm Artillery barrage range from 50 to 60. The unit is currently simply OP. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: USF Jeep5 Mar 2019, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 14:11 PMSupremeStefan the question is that nerf is really necessary ? because people seems dont complain and its just fragile truck with great utilty only strong in first 2min. Seriously think about it. Personally i dont care even dont like it much but why nerf things just because on paper looks op. Its like someone said mechanized is op because have sooo many units but u cant have them all together because they are situational like wc51. I can agree for that price this unit is great but its not game breaker especially in teamgames. Let me reverse the question, is that all utility really necessary? Unit should be balanced regardless of faction and commander. Being a bit more cost effective for particular reason is ok, but being silly cost efficient is not. The unit become extremely effective cost to make the commander more attractive during the first ravmp and these it little to justify is current state after the second. Especially since the combination with cav riflemen make more op. One can easily get a squad wipe with which is many cases cost more than the WC51 itself. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Transport's Passengers RNG in too high5 Mar 2019, 14:01 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 13:56 PMSander93 There needs to be a risk attached to the ability to run down and wipe retreating squads at that same 3 minute mark. Actually the chance to wipe retreating infatry with these vehicles should be lowered so that it less frustrating for both sides. In: Lobby
Thread: Veto maps5 Mar 2019, 13:58 PM I guess people who play only one faction consider others, that play all factions as weirdos. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Jeep5 Mar 2019, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 09:24 AMSupremeStefan Why u so hate it. I don't hate it. It simply OP Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 09:24 AMSupremeStefan Its cool commander but not really op as u think. No one use it in teamgames so i think this means commander its not op. Shermans are ok but nothing special, for late game jackson and scott are better combo. Wc51 dont save it and u if u want know barrage is bugged because if u kill truck after red flares barrage dont land and u lost 180 ammo and truck this happend to me almost three times so i give up with this commander. Imo the best part of this commander is mortar halftruck and cavalry rifleman. WC51 was buffed to justify taking up 1 commander slot, now it has been merged with m3 so it does not have to be so cost efficient. Even more so after the changes to USF tech. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Transport's Passengers RNG in too high5 Mar 2019, 08:25 AM In game there is number of units that can transport troops. When the vehicle is destroyed there in chance for that passenger to be instantly killed. As far as I know that chance is different in some cases. To make thing even more complicated some snares target the passenger and not the vehicle witch means that disembarking might lead to wipe. Imo the current situation is too RNG, confusing and complicated and needs fixing. I would suggest the following changes: 1) Snares do less damage to infatry so that disembarking does not lead to wipes even if passenger are targeted 2) Vehicle destruction critical kill to passengers removed or limited to 1 entity 3) Passenger now have a chance to take damage on vehicle destruction 4) Passenger now are suppressed on vehicle destruction, so that the transports vehicles are not used as kamikaze to break enemy lines. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Jeep5 Mar 2019, 07:29 AM Imo the problem goes beyond the Faust issue. The unit is simply OP. For 200 manpower you get both the vehicle and the crew. That can be used in a number of way for: Caping attack any HMG not in garrison Defend any point from a lone caping squad since one disembark and have 2 squad moveable fast repair a satchel transport and on top of that a kamikaze mark target/barrage unit. In addition the unit has more around x1.30 armor than Kubel. I would suggest that the crew would become unable to disembark and that the armor is reduced even if mean increasing the HP. The mark target and barrage should also be removed. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 17:40 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 17:01 PMMr.Flush Use the barrage in game. I do. If you expect to work at max range firing into the for of war it will not, most other barrage (other than big caliber artillery) will not work either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 16:44 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 16:37 PMSeductiveCardbordBox ... I was always of the impression the mortar had the damage reduction against cover, rather than built in to the shell itself. ... It was tested to have lower damage vs yellow cover, but I pointed that then mortar's effectiveness would be reduce in late when there is plenty of yellow cover similar to hmgs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 15:28 PMMr.Flush The barrage is useless because it does not take out stationary targets like at guns or mgs. The enemy does not even need to move them to survive. The scott is too good vs advancing infantry but garbage at displacing defenses. Number say another story: Barrage Scott's barrage and Pack howitzer's barrage are comparable. In: COH2 Balance