Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: New Commander patchnotes discussion thread1 Apr 2019, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 21:39 PMmurky depths Would that not let you bypass needing to actually build either tier to get the p4? Or does it unlock when either of the structures is put down? Cuz if you can just tech battle-phase 2 and build it without tier-3 down, that's a problem. Requirement could be either T3 building or T4 building. The suggestion simply eliminate the need to have the unit built from 2 separate buildings. In: Lobby
Thread: Hull Down rework1 Apr 2019, 09:36 AM Imo hull down should be renamed defensive positioning and provide bonuses custom made for each unit. For instance Oswind could get suppression and StuG rotation speed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Call-in cooldowns1 Apr 2019, 09:04 AM Having CD start working when the unit has been destroyed for super heavy tanks is a good change imo. I actually suggested in 2017. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST Grens1 Apr 2019, 08:29 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 22:25 PMBizrock Do you mean Health Points? I just used normal grens in a 4 man squad and every other squad without upgrades. I didn't even do the math with upgrades, if you want to compare the squad effectiveness with upgrades you can do it yourself *not talking about vipper EHP stands for effective hit point. It is the total HP of the squad taking into account target size. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] AT satchels for Panzergrenadiers in the new doctrine31 Mar 2019, 16:53 PM I would suggest that Pioneers get demolition charges not satchel. In addition I would suggest that the bonuses come from minesweeper upgrade with the extra 30 mu. Investing 60-90 munition to pio seem too much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] Double Panzershreck for Sturm + AT Fussie 31 Mar 2019, 09:12 AM Personally I am against panzerbushe 39 but I would test a Panzerfaust as weapon and not snare. It could be modeled after bazooka and I would add the option to put it away. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST Grens31 Mar 2019, 09:09 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 02:41 AMBizrock Lets do all the math, the best way to quantify the effective is by comparing DPS/Manpower. .... Greens have the best long DPS, just losing to Sections, and they still win vs Volks in every range. People need to know that you can't expect a Squad of Grens win Vs a squad of penals, they have different MP prices, but 5 squads of grens can win against 4 squads of Penals, and they are the same price. ... Only you math is bit of. It is not only DPS that matter but EHP also. If you want to find the "value" of a unit you have to add the square of its DPS and the square of its EHP. In addition the 4 Penals do not cost as much as 5 LMG Grenadiers since you also need 300 munition for 5 lmg grenadiers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 222 deserves a buff31 Mar 2019, 08:41 AM The 222 is simply overburden. It has to act a hard counter to cars and a hard counter to light tanks. Imo the issues solution would be to reintroduce the 221. Then the 221 can be a soft counter to car and 222 a soft counter to light tanks. Then both units can be balanced and priced accordingly. The autocannon should be brought inline with other autocannons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] Regular barrage for Walking Stuka30 Mar 2019, 17:38 PM I would actually test lowering the price of the Stuka and giving the incendiary barrage by default. That would solve the OKW problem of dealing with garrison when going T2 while it would the Stuka performance more consistent. HE barrage could be a vet ability. Currently the incendiary barrage is not worth the cost or xp level needed. Its a rather pointless ability. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback30 Mar 2019, 13:20 PM Version 2. SVT Drop. Continues to be can or worms. Apart from balance issues, are there SVT model for all infatry that can pick these weapons including axis infatry or are these units going to hold invisible weapons? Airborne Guards Ability provides simply too much, for 360 manpower one get a smoke screen, infield deployment a unit with ourah and grenades that can call off map at vet 1. Compared to unit like PG with nearly the same cost that is simply too much. Weapon upgrade take too long time can be sorter. Why does the unit start with SVT if it can get PPsh for free? Have the unit start PPsh make the upgrade a long range one giving 3 SVT+3 DP. SVT Air.G.: Ourah, smoke grenade, grenade is simply an OP combo. Ourah can be the vet 1 ability. DP Air.G.: All 3 abilities of the unit are badly designed. The unit is designed to fight long range thus according "relative positioning" it should be weak to QCQ that manage to close the distance. Yet the unit has all the tool it needs to avoid that: 1) ourah to keep enemy at distance and kite them 2) fire superiority to slow down any enemy unit trying to close in 3) Strafe to suppress many enemy units closing in 4) and frag grenade to finish off any enemy unit that manages to close in. It my opinion that abilities like the strafe should be limited to command unit like the Ostheer officer. Airborne Rally Point The ability is simply dirty cheap. I would suggest that one could have it cost the same as Ostheer command bunker and have any added utility provided as an upgrade similar to UKF FRP. That would allow to better balance the structure. DsHK Paradrop I will repeat that 6 men crew with 5 SVT is a problem, that sprint should be removed and that almost 60 close DPS +5 SVT is simply OP at vet 3. CP 10 IL-2 Rocket Strafe Instead of straight line maybe change so that the ability target vehicles within the strafe area? I was not able to test yet but it might too much damage vs OKW trucks. (does the damage reduction apply to trucks?) In: Lobby