Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback12 Apr 2021, 11:01 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 10:51 AMUnit G17 Ambush camo (only active in cover): -Pathfinders -JLI -JCS -Ostheer ambush camo upgrade -Fallschirmjaegers -AT conscripts -AT paratroopers Assault camo (active for a short duration after leaving cover): -All snipers -Partisans -Stormtroopers -Commandos -Vet3 pathfinders The only thing that makes commandos stick out is that they have light gammon bombs (equivalent to bundle nades). AI partisans have frag grenades. Stormtrooper have flame nades and tactical advance. There are more than 2 camo types in the game I suggest you check the editor because your list might be wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How i'm suppose to counter GRENADIER LMG12 Apr 2021, 10:08 AM How would you counter Conscripts with LMGs when using grenadiers? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback12 Apr 2021, 10:05 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 10:01 AMUnit G17 Well, IR pathfinders in particular have lots of sight and can also call in arty. I pointed out vet3, cuz they gain some invisibility duration out of cover at that rank, similar to commando, storm, partisan default camo. And they rank up super quickly. Camo isn't a problem imo, it's just they are not an everyday sight (huehue) and most people don't know how to counter them. Commandos can move to grenades range undetected while having one of the most powerful grenades in game. The effectiveness of their Camo on the move is a problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback12 Apr 2021, 09:57 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 09:55 AMUnit G17 So do stormtroopers, partisans, vet3 barfinders. Not exclusive to commandos. I don't think so since units can have different sight radius and different camo types. Feel free to test provide feedback. If there are identical they should also be lowered. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback12 Apr 2021, 09:54 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 09:44 AMKatitof Give it permanent aura or powerful AoE buff, because all other command vehicles have it. There is nothing wrong with AOE of Valentine. Vehicles Auras has very little to do with shared veterancy. Valentine get Victor arty instead an aura. In any case if your opinion Valentines need an aura feel free to make your suggestions instead of quoting mine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback12 Apr 2021, 09:32 AM Valentine: Remove shared veterancy since it not available to other Command vehicles Reduce XP value to 900 Reduce the penetration of main gun currently is has penetration value of AEC. Fix base stat/veterancy bonus at vet 3 the unit target size mobility are abnormally high: Target suze :16.2 Speed: 8.4 Accel: 2.6 Rotate: 45.6 Keep in mind that the unit has access to War speed on top of those bonus. Commandos: Increase deduction radius or change camo the unit very easily navigate late game battlefield cloaked. Churchill AVRE/Croc: Reduce XP value increase vet bonuses. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback12 Apr 2021, 08:10 AM Command Panzer IV: Lower Pop to 10 same as ostwind Lower XP value to 1790 same as ostwind (currently has more XP than normal PzIV) Replace the weapon rotation bonus with something that increase the "commander" aspect of the unit. Either the abilities or the aura. Increase close penetration of main gun from 55 to 100 (Valentine has 120/KV-8 has 140) Officer: Reduce reinforcement time to match grenadier Add a weapon upgrade as vet bonus similar to Sturm officer/Commisar's (extra entity) vet 2 23% received accuracy to -29% received accuracy to match assautl grenadier (they get 6.5% received accuracy at vet 1 also) +40% range of smoke and coordinated barrages replaced by CD/MU cost bonuses on abilities. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: STUKA anti tank strafe11 Apr 2021, 21:15 PM CAS commander is on of the least popular commander across all modes. It need a redesign. The strafe should Jaeger armor need weaker ability since it one of the most popular commanders In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mod Re-release (updated 11/26/21)11 Apr 2021, 20:27 PM nice icons In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback11 Apr 2021, 19:51 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2021, 16:25 PMltaustinpowers I agree this doctrine has a lot of vision abilities, even more so with flares from MOP. Although I love the thought of being able to plant riegel mines with panzer grens, I feel that by itself is a buff and I don't think paks should be allowed to cloak. Ultimately, this doctrine needs to be altered to make it less of an automatic selection when equipping commanders. Since it has so many vision options, I think recon overflight should be removed and replaced with something else. Unfortunately, that by itself may not even be enough to encourage players to consider an alternative commander as one of their three options. A less decisive option would be removing recon and replacing with something less impactful, such as the model 24 stun grenades. More drastic measures might include removing the stuka anti tank strafe and replacing with the anti infantry strafe. If more severe changes are made to this commander, then perhaps it would make sense to allow PGrens the ability to plant riegel mines (enabled as part of the MOP ability). The Paks where able to cloak and it caused little issues and it would cause if less if they did not get any first strike bonuses. But if such an ability become available it should probably not be available to Jaeger Armor and should probably be replaced by lower impact ability. Stun grenades could be an option, tactical movement could be an option, relief infatry or sprint could also be an option. In: COH2 Balance