No, that is not the question of this thread and I don't want to go this thread that way. This thread is about comparison of a units population to its own ressource cost, not about units having the right population and cost for their performance. So if you want to speak about JP in this thread then talk about its population beeing too high for its ressource cost. But I do think 400/135 to 15 is something that is pretty close to the other units ratio, especially if Firefly and Jackson cost would be exchanged. Then Firefly would be 400/140 to 15 which would be pretty much the same as JP. Jackson would have 440/145/16, that would be a similar ratio.
If you do think JP ist too expensive (population/ressource) overall, just make a new thread about it please. Thanks.
I am sorry to have to point out this to you but:
Population is unrelated to unit cost.
Both are related to unit performance within its own faction...
Yeah, I see that and it makes sense...
So sander93 just told that pop is related to unit performance and you just agreed with him but for some strange reason you disagree with me when I say the same thing.
But even according to your own argument (and suggestion):
Jackson atm (MP/FU/pop): 400/140/16
Firefly atm (MP/FU/pop): 440/145/15
(Firefly as you just suggested (MP/FU/pop): 400/140/15)
JP4 cost 400/135/15
thus should have lower pop