Normally, I would say yes. However due to the following issues, I don't think it's realistic to expect to trial Mortar Pit in FBP. And that's because of the usual scope shenanigans.
Firstly:
While Mortar Pit is in-scope, none of the following obvious features that directly affect the pit are part of the scope:
- Brace (only after a lot of begging we managed to bring it down to 20 seconds; that's still 20 seconds too long)
- Improved Fortifications (enjoy Mortar Pits now getting +140% effective improved durability vs its intended counters (compared to +20% before)
- Forward HQ (enjoy sim city aura)
- Stand Fast (enjoy unkillable mortar pits)
- Lava nade bonuses vs pits (enjoy seeing pits wiped effortlessly with Volks blobs)
- Fallschirmjagers (enjoy seeing the pit evaporate within seconds)
Basically, those artificial restrictions already hamstring us enough as it is. By the end of the day, we still have to deliver a Mortar Pit that is:
- Viable in vanilla-mode (i.e., no commander abilities)vs lava-nade-spamming Volks with STGs
- Killable in cancer-mode (e.g., improved fortification, stand-fast) vs LMG Grenadiers
- Cheap enough to punish HMG spam and allow people to push
- Expensive enough to prevent people from spamming it next to aura-giving FHQ's with auto-repair engineers
Secondly:
There's already 3 factions that start the game with a mortar. Do we need to have 4 factions out of 5 with an early mortar? Who's supposed to win in an OST vs UKF arty war in that case?
Doesn't that make those two factions feel even more similar than before?
Thirdly:
Synergy-wise, I've already seen that a scope-free mortar pit has good synergy with the rest of the faction (e.g., when Relic decides to let us fix 25-pounder barrage and the universal carrier), and also is not really that frustrating to take down.
So, now you have a faction that plays a bit different from the rest.
But yeah, for a potential future game, it would be nice if Relic avoided locking basic functionality behind expensive, all-or-nothing immobile emplacements. Also it would be nice if they provided mobile alternatives earlier, than let the vanilla 25 pounder barrage remain a completely useless ability 2 years into the game.
But, hey. At least Relic did it better than CoH1. Brits now have mobile suppression platforms and mobile AT guns.
Lastly:
At least, in the live (and FBP) when you do manage to take the Bofors down, the sim city is toast, and you can wipe everything.
If you have mobile mortar & Bofors, there's no way you will ever be able to catch the mortars. They'll just relocate and the sim city spammer will plop a new Bofors down for 280MP 30FU.
The mortars will just move to the next 280MP/30FU Bofors, like the three little piglets, and continue to nuke you, vetted and all.
Your first and second points are why this suggestion is made, because it would simplify it down to not having the mortar pit and only having to balance the mortar itself.
As for your 3rd point, no arguing about that, however, balance problems still persist and more mobile focused British players like myself are hampered by not having a non-doctrinal mobile indirect fire support platform that doesn't cost fuel.
Plus keeping the mortar emplacement in the game and perhaps giving it a bonus for mortars garrisoned in it or something of that sort would still keep the British in a unique spot, I'd also like to remind you that all other Armies also have MGs, Mortars and Medium tanks, the OKW and USF were also considered "unique" before for not having some of these things but because players were hampered they were added, the MG34 and Panzer IV for the OKW and mortar for the USF respectively.
As for your last point, have you actually tried this? Since from experience I noticed that the mortar pit is the most numerous emplacement constructed in a Sim City and is vital to it because it's an unreachable hand that can slap your attack down and you can't do anything about it. Especially before with their easier vet acquiring, they were untouchable and indestructible even if you brought down the Bofors covering it. Of course this is from my personal observations, I am not arguing that you're wrote, I'm just merely asking if you're tried it and stating my opinion on the matter.