Profile of Tiger Baron

Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2018, 22:52 PMelchino7

You are only thinking about the limit of your total army. The whole point of the popcap system, is the upkeep you are paying for it. Since you don't have ways to increase your man power, every point on pop is going to hurt you passively if you don't make use out of it.

Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2018, 23:02 PMblvckdream

If you make one model = pop size 1

-->

5 Conscripts squads-> 30 Pop

5 Grenadiers squads -> 20 Pop

Which means that the Soviets pay crazy upkeep and cant field enough units. Since one conscript model is significantly worse than one Grenadier model. Same for weapon teams.

That´s the reason why COH2 doesnt use the one model = 1 pop size. Thankfully.

Just imagine how unbalanced the game would be if lets say both sides had 5 mainline infantry units + one mg + at gun + mortar.... Soviets would end up at 48. Ost at 32.

Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2018, 22:43 PMblvckdream

It´s not because it would render Soviet 6 man units useless.

Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2018, 21:44 PMelchino7

The only problem with CoH2charts was that unless there was a ±10% difference between factions, not much can be said about it, due to how match making works on COH2. SiphonX made a good explanation about it.





First of all: nerfing double bars long range DPS and double bren/5man pop IS while giving proper buffs to UKF are in line but that doesn't mean everything else should be buff around it.

1- 6pdr is worht 8pop
2- PG could see some "side" buffs (i like the concept of 0.5 tiers so some specific units can arrive earlier) but reducing by 1 pop could be on the line.
3- I think for IS, the upgrade if possible should increase the popcap.
4- PF/AG/Prostruppen are fine.

Adding more units from other factions would made your topic less antagonizing.

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2018, 20:03 PMKatitof

And yet you want coh1 way, where the moment you were cut off in late game, you could not reinforce at all, because pop cap was not static 100, but a dynamic and dependent on number of sectors you controlled at the time.

As for the OP, I advise to go read up on patch notes and educate yourself why these things cost as much as they do, because the only thing that makes no sense is your reasoning here.

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2018, 20:36 PMIncendiaryRounds

Just like how the patch was one sided and basically buffed allies across the board and nerfed axis across the board. Do you have any constructive arguments besides pointing out the obvious?