Profile of JohnSmith

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1273

General Information


Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced1 Mar 2018, 13:27 PM I agree with that, but there's still the risk/reward factor, that also include other statistics e.g. speed, movement, turret, penetration, general usability etc. If KV2 and IS2 didn't already have had enough drawbacks to counterbalance that risk/reward factor, it'd be acceptable to discuss a nerf. But I believe these units have other problems that need to be fixed first and foremost to get them back into the game before considering a change to their back armor. In: Lobby
Thread: About Jacksons1 Mar 2018, 13:15 PM Seeing something being used in the game doesn't automatically mean it is a good idea to do that, especially if the result of the action is poor. You don't simply flank with the Puma. The games where the Puma is used is all about outmaneuvering the enemy tank, whilst still keeping its distance to it, then rush away. It is all about Hit and Run tactics using the advantages of the Puma. Not flanking - one doesn't simply flank with the Puma. A traditional flank maneuver would result in a dead Puma. Furthermore, your previous "claim" also counter-arguments your claim: Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2018, 12:45 PMVipper it accuracy and penetration does not allow it to engage enemy vehicles at long ranges. Puma has nothing common with M36 and should not be compared with it. If you really want to argue the schematics of flanking and hit and run tactics, be my guest. Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2018, 13:08 PMVipper Just watch some high level games where Puma is used. You claim simply demonstrates you luck of game knowledge. Attacking someone's game skills without any grounds because you disagree with the person - or because they didn't see the videos you saw - is poor argumentation and deters from the topic. Ad hominem, much? For instance, I don't argue about your utterly poor English Grammar (e.g. you luck of game knowledge) - it's pointless and off-topic. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: About Jacksons1 Mar 2018, 13:00 PM There are no flaws with his theory, read the full post instead of just picking sentences. Whoever uses Puma as reconnaissance only has never fully discovered their full potential as mid game enemy tank deterring unit. I wouldn't call it a tank-destroyer, but that would be an useless bickering on schematics. Flanking with a Puma is a clear no-no, and no experienced player would ever do that. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced1 Mar 2018, 12:56 PM The arguments to lower the armor due to axis having had theirs lowered is crumbling apart. There's absolutely no reason to blanket change something that doesn't need changing at all. These Allied tanks already have got other drawbacks for having slightly better back armor. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW Handheld AT solution.1 Mar 2018, 12:21 PM Never give Volks a dedicated AT upgrade any more. It's clearly not needed. And not welcome at all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient27 Feb 2018, 13:59 PM Get off your high horse, nobody pretends to speak on behalf of Relic or modders in this thread - that is a wild groundless accusation. If you say you back up arguments, there's countless you never back up yourself, including this one. You're just derailing the thread from its intended topic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient27 Feb 2018, 13:09 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 13:02 PMVipper Patch decisions are made by Relic not the moders. Can we have a quote either by Relic or the moders pls? What about you provide that quote instead of forcing others to do your bidding? It'll be more productive than luring people into having to go through MrSmiths posts one by one to just validate something that has already been debated by the modders to death. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient27 Feb 2018, 08:54 AM Good players do cover their JP4 flanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 mortar pit worth it?26 Feb 2018, 19:37 PM Jeez Vipper, do you have to turn every thread into a Katitof - troll attempt fest? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic close to shutting down - not profitable26 Jan 2018, 12:11 PM To the outside world, nothing has changed. It does not mean that nothing has changed internally! In: Lobby