Profile of JohnSmith

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1273

General Information


Thread: Performance and cost efficiency of massed SU76s vs SU8526 Mar 2018, 13:26 PM It didn't include any of my thoughts, i just said that I watched the replay and that I consider it as a great example - I was agreeing with your thoughts that this unit is peculiar for this given game-type, and map and strategy. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Performance and cost efficiency of massed SU76s vs SU8526 Mar 2018, 13:14 PM Hey that's a great replay - it seems that the SOV player has been using the same strategy for a while and has mastered microing that many units at once. Steppes is also the map to do this kind of spam on, it wouldn't work elsewhere. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers26 Mar 2018, 10:23 AM I like when my 2on2 team-mate uses the PW, and it provides great support to get rid of infantry. However at the same time, it saddens me, because if an opponent knows my random OST team-mate went T4 for an early-ish PW, it'll give my opponents free reign with their bloody ally tanks. It being in T4 is the biggest issue. It should be on T3, but build able after unlocking the last BP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers24 Mar 2018, 16:05 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 15:45 PMZombiFrancis I don't think the HT changed itself, but the change in tiers made it come incredibly faster than it ever had in the past. That timing was what warranted the Quad HT to lose reinforcement, (and by extension the flameHT, which made sense, but was mostly a retroactive punishment for the unit being so prominent in the early days. A lot of units have been buffed or nerfed on those grounds unfortunately.) Yeah, similar to your experiences I still recall the week where the Katyusha was buffed to the point that it became so ridiculously overpowered. It was able to to destroy a fully deployed OKW base in a few volleys. It was the same for the week when USF's assault engineers were buffed to unbalanced T0 monsters of doom. Then came the LeigFestOctober'16. Fun times, ey. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Possible map 1v1 removal24 Mar 2018, 11:35 AM Tbh, I would just prefer a larger map-pool and less vetos to allow a bigger selection of playable maps. Yes, less vetos - I don't like the current system of vetoing maps a faction isn't as strong in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers24 Mar 2018, 11:11 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 11:06 AMVipper Lets try this once more time since some people seem to have trouble understanding. It is my opinion that Ostheer T3 is not "great" (or so good). It gives access to 3 units which I would rank P4 is indeed not so good as other medium, and by definition, if something is not as good as something else, it's worse than it. We got your point, thanks for clarifying. Edit: If you did not edit your posts after them being quoted to change your meaning, it'd be clearer from the beginning. This is a forum, not a chat - you can easily proofread before posting. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers24 Mar 2018, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 09:39 AMVipper My point is quite simply ostheer Panzer IV is not "so good". I agree with you, P4 is in a really bad spot and worse than other mediums out there. If it weren't for some doctrinal abilities (e.g. smoke), it'd be at the very bottom of the list In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AE's King Tiger Adventure Analysed by Someone With Eyes24 Mar 2018, 10:20 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 23:22 PMShadowLinkX37 On most tanks [...] Hey, thanks for sharing. That's clear and concise, well written too. What about you write a guide for this page? That'd be great. In: Lobby
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 10:53 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 10:17 AMVipper You are simply contradicting yourself. When ever it suits you Hammer/Anvil is tech and then suddenly it is not. The fact remains that Hammer/Anvil is worth the cost even if ones does not build a Comet/Churchill while T4 is not worth it in most cases. The rest is jut you arguing semantics to create the impression that Ostheer have an advantage with their "premium" T4. Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 10:50 AMVipper Try writing "veeeeery slowly" you will then avoid writing contradicting things. What's wrong with that now? There's clearly two different meanings behind what he says. Keep your threads topics to your own threads. Here's a link to your own thread about this subject, please stop derailing this thread just for the sake of you vs Katitof: https://www.coh2.org/topic/68495/the-tech-cost-for-lmg-rifle-grenades-and-bundle-grenades You should focus on reading full sentences instead of trying to pick apart cross threads various words just to show to the forum obsessionally why you believe he's wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The tech cost for LMG, rifle-grenades and bundle grenades. 19 Mar 2018, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2018, 17:34 PMVipper Dear Johnsmith this is your fifth post in this thread and none of them have anything to do with Ostheer tech. At this point I have to assume that you are simply flaming/trolling and will not read anything else you post in this thread. I have to point out that you are no longer welcomed in this thread. Have nice day. BB. What the ... (and this was the only first off-topic post that I did in this thread - btw: thanks for the bait, and counting each of my posts and validating them against your very own threshold and counting them off-topic because I disagreed with you. You could have just PM'ed me. instead of this.) In: Lobby