Profile of Mr.Smith

flamers could become nondoctrinals, and Sturmpio should have access to 2 upgrades at once, due to their cost it's very reasonable, this up doctrinal thing from Feuersturm could give flamers to volks or as a secondary flamer for sturms (only if there's no other upgrade on them, except the first flamer), same thing could be done with british sappers and US RE's, that's how i'd solve the early building issue, flamers for every faction

It might work without flamers, provided the factions without flamers get access to decent indirect fire that can handle buildings.

About the ungarrisoning thing, i really like that models one by one are leaving the building, this actually solves the RNG wipes with leaving building, but the 0.5s (is that correct) per model to leave is too high, 0.25 would be more reasonable

0.5 secs is gametime. For instance, Gammon bombs have an 1 second fuse time but they do seem to blow up much faster.

We could definitely try lower garrison/ungarrison times. However, when we first tried half of the mod-values, the changes seemed ineffective.

The garrison ungarrison changes will make building-hopping completely ineffective at dodging indirect fire. The problem, of course, is that OKW LeIG doesn't deal enough damage vs garrisoned troops.

the Sturm officer, as was mentioned here by Frost, could get a buff, where units around the officer do not retreat when one model from the squad (officer itself) dies, but the aura is canceled for those, that would really make this unit useful

That would work

I agree to some extend, which is why i am undecided. My only gripe is how long it takes to have control of the squad again, meaning i have to sit there and babysit them until i can issue another order. No way to reduce that time? Also as i believe Tightrope pointed out, the unit clumps into one spot just before entering the building, making one hit wipes possible.

Lowering de-garrison speed is the key element that will allow grenades to, finally, have some effect on garrisons. Ideally, you should be allowed to issue commands while your squad is exiting. However, there is no way to have both. Thus, your best bet is to make a good use of your ungarrison command, and pick a good location you want your units to go to.

i.e., if you want your units to go out, and then run behind some boxes, just right click behind the boxes immediately, rather than wait for them to ungarrison and THEN click behind cover.

The de-garrison delay is also a small win vs infiltration units. You can't issue attack/ability commands to your infiltration units until they are all out, and that gives 1-2 secs of warning time, at least.

You should avoid entering a building while there are squads shooting at you; or at least try to use a backdoor for that. This is what makes garrison-swaps possible in DBP. Hopefully that will make rushing key garrisons less relevant in the meta.

Hey; it might also give mappers some slack so that they can use something other than wooden buildings in their maps.

Try playing live-version Westwall, and let us know how it feels now. Aside from infiltration cheese it's a good map.

Only if relic greenlights the fix.

The cause for this bug is that IL-2 strafe cannons can traverse down far enough. Therefore, they end up wasting a lot of their potential.

According to elchino7 (if I understand correctly)the Kill radius of stuka in the Patch is 9.5 while according to you the kill radius of the Gustav is 5.6 and 8.1 so its hardly 3 times more.

π * 9.5^2 ~= 3 * π * 5.6^2

Even though I dont agree with them, I understand why so many people opposed against FRP disable cooldown. In lower ranked games concept of soft-retreat may not be known. Still, even if this feature is getting abandoned I think a +75% cost may be too hefty. This is 3 times bigger penalty than before. Did you try the +50% variant somehow?

It's time per model; not MP per model.