Profile of karolllus

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 172

General Information
Website: https://www.twitch.tv/slingergosusenna
Steam: 76561198040288485


Thread: FBP: A Relic survey1 Aug 2017, 21:54 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 21:12 PMSturmpanther But intresting to know. I mean you can't wipe any weaponteams anymore if they have full HP. I wouldnt call myself a fanboy because I played a lot of axis during penal-flamers meta. I come from a country that was invaded by nazi germany and for that reason I dont necessarily like to play axis but I do play them from time to time. My most favorite faction are probably soviets because I love to play aggresively, fast with a mix of units so I dont really mind all the micro they require. I hate current penals meta because its boring and im forced to only few commanders to be effective. I would like to see some cons as basic infantry and until they get buffed or reworked properly not to be utter garbage soviets will have problems in 2v2. I play mostly 2v2 but Im learning 1v1 maps too atm. I think usf is the worst designed faction so far. Literally one dimensional and over the years nothing was done about that. You either go bars infantry spam or nothing else. Really pathetic design. Yeah and about the stuka xD well I like the scatter now, its more in line with other factions and not just in line (if you catch my drift) . I didnt like how pwerfer got nerfed to shit. Its already one of the worst artillery pieces out there. But maybe lefh will take its part a bit more because of that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP: A Relic survey1 Aug 2017, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 19:43 PMSturmpanther Wait you think the stuka is still too good after the change? And well how should I know it. Everyone only talks about Jacksons... Intresting i had almost fear that we nerfed the stuka too much^^ P.S Sorry but i saw too many people in balance forum talking about FBP but never played it self ... Well I you never asked me how I feel about the jackson changes nor did I talk about them. I think those changes were unnecessary and jackson was strong enough without them. But stuka hmm... saying that stuka was op is an understatement, stuka was insanely op with literally no aoe scatter, perfect hits every time and incredible aoe dmg + she still has lowest fuel needed to rush so yeah she is still the most op non doc arty my german friend. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP: A Relic survey1 Aug 2017, 19:17 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 18:55 PMSturmpanther Never saw a replay from you playing the mod Oh, excuse me but I didnt know there was an obligation to inform sturmpanther if you played the mod? Well I did, I tested few things for myself, including the new stuka aoe pattern and durability which I liked but it still is the fastest non doctrinal artillery in the game so it kinda still is op in that sense. Its not crazy op (like it's now in live version) but op nontheless. Next time, dear friend don't assume anything about another person, instead try asking that person first instead. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP: A Relic survey1 Aug 2017, 18:44 PM Finally relic asked us for some feedback. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is Wehrmacht Competitive Right Now?1 Aug 2017, 18:11 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 16:56 PMRifleMan Judging by the tournament, ostheer seems to be one of the stronger factions. Their mortar,mg is good. LMG grens will shred any infrantry in sight by just brainless A-moving and pak/stug wall with TWP will easily deal with any armour. If against USF I would go for a g43 doctrine and they can handle riflemen pretty well at all ranges pretty much. I agree that ost is one of the stronger factions if played well. Basically the problem with ost is that you need to have a brain to play that faction thats why some players tend to play more okw where brain is not required. Ost has basically counter to anything and can play every map if you have the right commander. You get nice late game combo with heavy tank + airstrike in quite few commanders, you have strong specialized commanders like prostruppen. You can play close range skirmishes with g43 upg or pgrens, you can play long maps with elephant and spotting scopes, you can snipe artillery with stuka bombing + recon, you have best elite infantry in the game (storm troopers) that can shred anyone to pieces with stgs and double the armor of any other infantry. You have the most op airstrike in the game called 'close the pocket'. On top of that you have the best mg in the game, best mortar, best sniper, best at infantry, best at gun, solid vanilla armor. Basically if you have a little bit of brain and you're not a complete chimpo (like most okw players) you will have a lot of fun playing ost and using their incredible versatility. If on the other hand you just want an easy win, with no micro, just to blob and push and get a super tank in late game then play okw ^^. I mean why make it harder for yourself right? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 automatch maps balance feedback [POLL]1 Aug 2017, 13:03 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 12:28 PMTric I love how you say "talented map makers like tric(k)" and then down the line "I mean who eve makes those kinds of maps and who is stupid enough to add them to automatch" Tric I didnt want to offend you in no way, shape or form. I have nothing else but deep respect for you Tric. I dont blame the map creators I thank them for their hard work and commitment. With that being said I prepared this poll to reveal which maps can and should be updated because they give unfair advantage to one starting side. Also maps that favor heavily one faction side should be removed from automatch until they get reworked. If any modmakers want us to petition relic to support the idea I think everyone here will agree to do that no problemo. If you have a better idea how to change it then let us know, this is the place. So far maps that seem to favor one starting point are: Moscow Winter, Moscow Summer, Semoisky Winter, Rzhev Winter, Hamlet (suggested by sturmpanther) Maps that favor allies heavily: Liernaux, Dusseldorf Maps that facor axis heavily: Minsk Pocket, Across the Rhine, Lisores River, Pripyat Sector, Rzhev Winter (?) I strongly believe that relic even if undermanned would listen to our demands and act in accordance to them if we were able to articulate specifically what we want, prepare list of changes, prepare map updates, prepare reasoning behind all of the changes and show vast community support just leaving relic to accept and implement the changes. I believe we have that kind of power if we work together on the solution it must be clearly and specifically stated what it is that we want to change. P.S. Don't be offended but Pripyat in its current state blows, two vitory points, left side is coverless, right side and middle has walls but its painfully tight there, you can hardly fit a tank there not to mention manouver it. Its basically an axis free win. If I had to change pripyat I would try to open it up a little bit and work around buildings, make more of them accesible for infantry so you can manouver there more. There are too many chokepoints on that map and factions like brits or ost thrive on that map literally. Also it needs a third victory point somwhere (maybe place them in a shape of a triangle?). Also my problem with lisores is that its too easy to camp on it making it an axis late game heaven. Each river crossing can be easily covered with 1 mg. Artillery spam is real on that map making it noob friendly. Lisores might be fine if the middle wasnt covered in mud and negative cover or something. Because otherwise you have arty fest and camping. Or even better rework the river, push it to the side and leave half of the map open and half covered with bridges and mud crossings for playtyle diversification. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 automatch maps balance feedback [POLL]1 Aug 2017, 11:20 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 11:11 AMSturmpanther The problem with your poll: Like Semisko, minks, hamlet, moscau: If you are south ggwp easy game. If you get north get RIP. And on top of that why are they even keeping two identical moscow maps, kek? Imo balance starts with the maps not the factions and since there are so many talented map makers like trick why nobody is fixing the years old problems? On top of that they added pripyat sector, a cramped map with only 2 victory points and literally 0 cover. I mean who even makes those kinds of maps and who is stupid enough to add them to automatch? Or lisores river where the game takes twice as long as it would normally take because of the frikkin bridges. So many questions so few anwsers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 automatch maps balance feedback [POLL]31 Jul 2017, 15:43 PM This topic is mainly to survey how people feel about certain 2v2 maps, whether they are balanced or not. Are they giving advantage to one side or another and should some of them be removed etc. Please share your opinions on which maps you think should be removed from 2v2 automatch or reworked and how. Please also remember to add your reasoning behind proposed changes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Two most important balance issues that need to be addressed28 Jul 2017, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2017, 21:04 PMinsaneHoshi Then why is the cost to rush it 100 fuel? You're right 70 for puma, 50 for mech regiment makes 120 minus starting 10 is 110. So it should be 110 which doesnt impact overall score but you are right thats a mistake. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Two most important balance issues that need to be addressed28 Jul 2017, 21:04 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2017, 21:01 PMinsaneHoshi And this doesn't even include where you numbers are actually wrong, and dont reflect teaching costs for example. My fuel calculations include teching costs ofcourse ^^. In: COH2 Balance