|
Del pls |
|
Since we are getting all historical in here, the 122 was poorly designed, it was repurposed from a naval gun and it had to load its shell and propellant seperatly.
But OT it's cheaper than the KT, has high armour and is quite fast for a heavy tank.
Mabe it should get its damage buffed to 200 (IMO tiger should receive a similar buff) |
Imo IS-2 much better, than ISU-152. It is one of the best tanks for allies.
On the other hand i find weird that fact, that 122-mm D-25T(IS-2 main gun) deals 160 damage, and 8.8-cm L/71 (Tiger II main gun) deals 240 damage. In the same way 152-mm guns (ML-20 on ISU-152 and M-10T on KV-2) deals only 240 damage, and 12.8-cm gun/8.8-cm guns (Jagdtiger and Elefant) deals 320 (in WBP 300) damage.
Don't forget the historically meh 76mm gun of they firefly doing 200-280 damage |
2ndly the KT doesnt need to push. it just has to sit there and wipe squads left and right then pull back to repair and let ur own TD/panthers to snipe off su85s/fireflies/jacksons which are pretty much the best counters in the game for KT.
.
Why do you not expect at least 1000 mp and 400 - 470 fuel not to be hard to crack? |
As stated earlier, Pumas can pen the Pershing reliably. It's commonly known that the pershing doesnt have great armour.
Another wtf statement. Pumas have less of a chance to pen a Pershing than a FF to pen a KT, yet somehow you are making it out that the FF doesn't ever pen and the puma always pens. |
And another thing.
People say "use TD". Ok, but if a support my KT with two clocked raketen, the TD can kiss my azz 
Some things are easier said than done. And to deal with KT is easier said than done. You can deal with it but its very very hard. For all skill levels
And if you support a blob of inf with two at guns who are as good as cloaked from 60 range the KT can kiss your ass.
Any unit in this game is strong when "properly supported" to the degree that critical mass can be achieved and become impregnable. |
Tigers are reliably consistent to pen, but the real question here seems to be... would you rather a KT or a Pershing?
.
No I still think the question is why should anyone take your suggestions for game balance seriously when you blatantly make up information, like the Pershing having paper armour.
Oh and tigers are consistent to pen because USF and UKF pen values (and damage too) were power creeped to make tiger armor obsolete.
|
The mental capacity wasn't about you, it was about the other posts after you such as "Lol no" etc etc.
The king only costs 50 more fuel than a pershing/Crock and 80 MP more than a crock, yet, the crock is getting a massive nerf to its flame weapon and the pershing has paper armour but the KT can still (as mentioned here too) 1 shot 5 man full health squads consistently.
The bounce 5x in a row was bad RNG yes, but its consistent enough for me to notice someone here will be able to do the math better than I can, but im fairly certain at max range, only 1 in 3 of my shots ever pen from a FF. Lets not forget I have to engage from max range with the FF's paper armour.
See, you mentioned comets but they got a nerf facing the KT is like facing the pre nerf comets.
I don't think you know what you are talking about when you describe the Pershing as having paper armour when it has 300, the same as a Tiger |
Not to mention that allied lights need to hug soldiers to actually inflict any kind of damage.
Do you even play this game? t70 hits and kills models from far range. |
you mean, rush a t70 and run over a teller or invisible raketen and shoot yourself on the foot because you are now 70 behind schedule.
Because only axis have mines and at guns.
It isnt that hard to not run a light vehicle into an area where you have not swept.
|
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
