Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]30 Sep 2017, 21:02 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2017, 17:26 PMVaz Those are reference values, they aren't very good for actual in-game combat. How does that prove anything? There is cover, abilities, vet. All in the real game. The reference dps values are an average from one set of calculations, they aren't guaranteed. Well they are the basis for in game combat. You can just ignore the base dps values of units in this game because the unit with the higher DPS might be caught in red cover every once and awhile. Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2017, 17:26 PMVaz The best you can do with these reference values is calculate a long range battle, which of course is in the grenadiers favor, followed by volks. Volks beat RM at long range, lolwat? With no upgrades the best the volks can hope for is a stalemate. If there is cover the Riflemen can easily advance. With upgrades (say STG x 2 vs BAR) The volks loose assuredly at all ranges. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]27 Sep 2017, 03:28 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2017, 21:41 PMBizrock You all are Popcap. If only USF had some sort of convenient way to safely ignore popcap restrictions, hmmm. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: penal battalions are op26 Sep 2017, 23:49 PM Well duh. To be fair penial nerfs should come with conscript buffs (moving half their recieved accuracy to vet 2 and rounding off their rng dps) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some concerns with Panzerfuseliers.26 Sep 2017, 09:20 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Sep 2017, 03:57 AMgbem a nugget of information you should note is the DPS and range of the IS-2 and pershing in contrast to the KT.. hell even a panther.... although the IS-2 has the armor of the KT it has 13.49(!!!) far DPS and a measly 40 range in contrast to the KT`s 21.55 and 45 range... the pershing is closer at 18.60 far DPS and 45 range but suffers in terms of armor at 300 armor... the cheaper panther even compares to these with 16.71 dps 50 range and 320 armor (but of course sacrifices anti infantry capability) Which is fine since the pershing and the IS-U cost much less and get to ignore tech. Jump back to quoted post26 Sep 2017, 03:57 AMgbem now lets compare the SU-85 and the JP4 28.88 far dps 185 penetration 230 armor 20 rotation rate 5.7 top speed and stealth capabilities(!!) for the JP4 25.48 far dps 230 penetration 160 armor 22 rotation rate and 5.5 top speed for the SU-85 the jagdpanzer 4 with 185 penetration of course isnt going to fare well as an SU-85 with 230 against a KT or a panther... but since the allied heavies either have anemic DPS or weaker armor much of it is compensated... not to mention the fact that the JP4 still maintains the range advantage over the mentioned allied heavies meaning it can still harass the said heavy and drill them with higher DPS (but at lower penetration) than the equivalent SU-85... not to mention its stealth capabilities which are always handy lastly hard countering allied heavies isnt the JP4s forte with only 185 penetration.. but what it does have is 230 armor and 28.88 far DPS and a romulan cloaking device making it the perfect counter to all allied medium tanks and tank destroyers (except the SU-85 ironically since it can self spot and kite to alleviate the dps trouble)... very much worth the 50 manpower and 5 fuel increase Its much harder to kite allied HTs like the IS-2 due to the higher speed difference too In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some concerns with Panzerfuseliers.25 Sep 2017, 06:38 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2017, 05:47 AMjagd wölfe 130 fuel isn't the same of 135. How can you guys not understand that jadgpanzer 4 has less pen and counter mediums and tank destroyer but is useless if your opponent get heavy stuff ? 185 pen will hardly penetrate pershing or is2. A tank destroyer with 220 penetration is designed to counter heavies. This comparison makes as much sense as grens vs sherman... Furthermore apart from the activated abilities, Su85 has better offensive vet while the Jp4 has better defensive vet, its vet 2 +30% of the time turns a 58% chance to pen a tiger 2 to a 76% chance In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]23 Sep 2017, 19:47 PM People saying that Stuka is op are forgetting one critical thing, you have to play trash tier OST to access it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]22 Sep 2017, 20:01 PM You should consider the following before making conclusions. Do both require sight? Which commanders come with Stuka close air support and how is the rest of their kit compared to paratroopers and etc In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes 2 Not so Balanced US Forces need real Buff22 Sep 2017, 00:05 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2017, 07:16 AMJae For Jett "Is usf bad or do i suck," or something. Tl;dr of it is: volks vet 1 +10% acc removed/changed to something else (not other combat stats) Flame nades given a fuse, and i think they could really use other changes afterwards as well Stgs increased to 90 munis so that players actually have to (hopefully) choose between stgs, flame nade spam, and med crates Reasoning is in my actual post, too lazy to copy it over, sorry about that Because only allied infantry should have good received accuracy bonuses? Rifles have a target size of .97 to start and -23% at vet 2 and -15% at vet 3. Yet that is not op but Volks having -10% at vet 1 and -10% at vet 3 is? Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2017, 07:20 AMJae For Jett Well, guess we can finally tell for certain now that hes trolling. Im going to stop replying to him and feeding the troll and ask that everyone else do the same so that we can stick with actual productive lines of conversation Because its productive when you ignore cold hard stats and call him a troll because you don't have anyway to back your beliefs up? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes 2 Not so Balanced US Forces need real Buff20 Sep 2017, 19:12 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2017, 09:23 AMEsxile I completely agree with you so why ISGs kill models so easily? Maybe something to do with the fact that it's more expensive, comes later on, doesn't support the strongest infintry and is absolutely crap when shooting out of LOS And I'm pritty sure it has a lower AOE anyways In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes 2 Not so Balanced US Forces need real Buff20 Sep 2017, 08:58 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2017, 19:15 PMEsxile Wasn't complaining about the XP gain but the poor average killing value of the unit. A mortar is supposed to kill models, not just damage them. That's just like your opinion. There is a damn reasonable argument to why the best infantry in the game should not be supported by a mortar that is supposed to kill models. In: COH2 Balance