Profile of Horasu

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 279

General Information


Thread: USF blob + partisan tankhunter spam21 Dec 2015, 17:59 PM Calling it now: OP is Schwarzenschnitzel's alt account made to troll In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Okw Elite Armored.21 Dec 2015, 17:45 PM It's good if you go heavy into t2 with a lusch and a puma. Puma with heat rounds can destroy any allied med tank if micro'd well. Transition into t3 with p4 or jp4 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: .50 cal20 Dec 2015, 06:05 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2015, 04:24 AMVuther Solution there would be to give it AP rounds instead of Sprint at vet 1 (and of course, if HMG42 can get an ability for light AT at vet 1 on a 260 MP platform, why can't the 280 MP M2HB get it?). Sprint is definitely still a good ability, but I'd say the niche AP rounds would add to T1 would still be far more impressionable. I'd prefer passive increased penetration with a price increase just to have variety. It creates an unique MG that adds a lot of flavor to the faction. And I hate the HMG42's long setup time for its incendiary rounds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet industry and allied fuel drop19 Dec 2015, 05:51 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2015, 05:36 AMA big guy 4u Oh great. I must be new because I don't have the same opinions as you. The thing is Soviet industry is supposed to focus on vehicles the same way Close Air Support is focused on air power: it should be a tradeoff. Now it's just a weak fuel drop. 30 fuel for 100 muni? seriously? He's saying you're new here because you assert that no one complains about it, when it was trash and everybody complained about it heavily for a very long time, which might have influenced its change. The fact that you didn't know this meant you must not have been here for very long... or just have turned a blind eye to every soviet industry thread for the past year. And it was trash. What use is 500 fuel if you have 0 manpower? Also >12 posts on coh2.org >Speaks on behalf of coh2.org community In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak43 kill my vet 3 katyusha 2x on his max distance?19 Dec 2015, 05:05 AM Without looking at your replay, I'm guessing it shot something within its range, missed, and the bullet happened to fly past everything and hit your katyusha purely by chance. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: .50 cal19 Dec 2015, 05:00 AM I'd be down for .50 cal having light AT capabilities to make up for the fact that you forsake the AT gun by going LT (at least for a while). Right now going LT is a death sentence against OKW In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December 17th Patch Ninja Changes18 Dec 2015, 03:41 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2015, 02:10 AMWhat Doth Life?! True... but it's also pretty misleading that every patch since release has had myriad ninja changes. +1. If there is anyone to blame for being paranoid, it's you guys and your incomplete notes.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Time for Statistics14 Dec 2015, 03:52 AM Bringing this thread back a bit since we've had a weekend to collect win rate data after the dec 10th hotfix. The first thing I noticed is that even though people say that 1v1 was "almost perfect," the dec 10th changes brought OKW down from a .78 winrate to an average of .65, which is still 2nd or 3rd highest among the 5 factions. It really just goes to show that there is always room for improvement and "almost perfect" might not be as perfect as we think it might mean. The patch did wonders for 2v2 balance as well, bringing OKW from a whopping ~.88 winrate to .667, which is still highest among the 5 factions, but it's within acceptable parameters. Really, I think the patch helped 1v1 and 2v2 the most out of everything. 3v3 and 4v4 saw improvements as well. Axis still top, but the difference is no longer crushingly staggering. Interestingly enough, UKF spiked to highest winrate in 4v4 for today. Why? What are your guys' thoughts? Thumbs up or thumbs down for dec 10 changes? For me, definite thumbs up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Weak Ostwind11 Dec 2015, 04:21 AM I think a small incremental increase to either its accuracy or its aoe is in order, since I am hestitant to think of what an overbuffed ostwind would do to the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December 10Th Hotfix11 Dec 2015, 04:18 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2015, 04:03 AMnee So why bother with giving OKW 100% income if the fuel costs are proportionate to how they were before? I do not recommend side upgrades for OKW (or Ostheer for that matter), seeing as the only abilities people complain about are Volksgrenadiers' two abilities, both which already require a HQ truck deployed. If anything just raise the fuel costs for building a HQ truck. Fuel costs have not been reverted, if you read earlier posts in this thread, they are still highly advantaged after the revamp. In: COH2 Gameplay