Profile of Horasu

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 279

General Information


Thread: Name Your Commanders Contest15 Oct 2015, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 19:22 PMdasheepeh USF : The Commander I know that's a joke, but if there are enough jokesters out there, it could seriously be in the running. Too bad I'm not a jokester. In: Lobby
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 19:18 PMMortar My name suggestions: USF: Force Concentration Doctrine OKW: Total War Doctrine Thread's open on the official forums for input, you should strike while the iron is hot. I already put mine in. Cavalry Company and Urban Operations Doctrine. In: Lobby
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?15 Oct 2015, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 19:10 PMDullahan All artillery should be useable anywhere. Base sector safehaven bullshit is awful. Alright, well please make a new topic about that, and be sure to mention air superiority and concentrated fire for UKF. I'll watch. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?15 Oct 2015, 19:11 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 19:10 PMDullahan And how many hundreds of munitions does that cost? I'll answer that question with my own. If UKF has an ability for 800 munitions that ends the game in a victory, is that good game design? What if that ability was in the same commander with a fuel-to-munitions transfer? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: LeIG AND Packhowitzer are useless without auto facing15 Oct 2015, 19:10 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 19:03 PMJ1N6666 LOL the OP and everyone agreeing with him just lost all credibility. Thread of fucking liars. OP was flaming people and calling them "shitheads" for not playing the game before giving their opinions, too.... Can we get a thread lock? This is a joke. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brit sniper and light vehicles?!?15 Oct 2015, 19:08 PM As much as I agree that snipers countering their counter sucks, their place in the UKF army as anti-vehicle is too entrenched due to army design at this point. If you remove sniper AT capability, their AT before late game will be very, very weak. Something else must be buffed if sniper AT is removed. Despite this, however, I digress to point out the fact that the sniper's weapon, the Boys AT rifle, is already part of the model, and is a defining point for the UK sniper, so I think Relic changing it at this point is close to nonexistent. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?15 Oct 2015, 18:43 PM Also, one last word, if you can defend dive-bombing an enemy base, then I encourage you to make a thread to enable UKF's concentrated artillery fire and air superiority to be used in base sectors. Can't do it? Hypocrites. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?15 Oct 2015, 18:40 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 18:34 PMAustralian Magic If I say tank, it means 1 tank. If I say tanks, it means at least 2. Similar. If I say squad, it means 1 squad. If I say squads, it means at least 2. So when someone says about wiping squads in base, it's obvious that it's, most of the time, about mass blob and mass retreat. Why? Because timing for 1 squad is really difficult for dive bomb user, whle it's easy to move away 1 squad (not to mention that recon+dive bomb to have a chance to wipe 1 squad is not a good deal and I havent seen it even once during my XXXX hours). But when you retreat 4 squads which are blocking themselfs in base so you cannot move them away instantly, then it has to be mass retreat. That's not the post you originally quoted, buddy. I'll be reporting the rest of your posts regarding dumb grammar as both off-topic and trolling. Also, the quote was "a squads" which is a typo. If you're not 100% dumb, then you are aware that you are twisting words to get at my goat. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?15 Oct 2015, 18:38 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 18:33 PMDullahan Oh so you mean that he got vision on your base, called in the barrage with X amount of munitions and then forced a mass retreat of all your infantry to coincide with the bombing run? In DoW2 if someone managed to throw a nuke in your base, you were already fucked anyway more often than not. The same is pretty much true here I think. Yes, in case you did not know, you can easily recon your opponent's base with the recon strafe from the same commander. You can then use this vision to drop a bomb. That means from the moment he unlocks divebomb, your base is vulnerable for a nuke no matter what. You might have thought, "you can counter it by not letting your opponent scout your base." Well, there. You can't do that. It's so quick that you can do it as a reactionary move AFTER your opponents retreat, especially in a large map. So to answer your question, yes, you can, sincerely, do all of that. You can catch your opponent out, make him retreat, THEN recon his base, and drop a game-ending bomb. All you need is timing, but once you're aware of that, then it's all downhill from there. Thanks for the questions, I'm glad I could educate just how cheesy this maneuver is. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?15 Oct 2015, 18:28 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 18:25 PMAustralian Magic You said clearly in post before about squads in base. So I ask, why would you make mass retreat, since squads, not squad. I'd report you for trolling, but instead I'll give you an English lesson. If you say 1-2 [noun] then the noun is plural despite the possibility of there being only 1 of something. So when I say 1-2 squads, it can be either 1 squad or 2 squad or anything. Even losing 1 squad to something uncounterable is a travesty in an RTS. Are you seriously basing your agument over some grammar and spelling? Can I get a more substantive response please? Drop it. In: COH2 Gameplay