Profile of Nabarxos

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 392

General Information


Thread: 2v2 Double Brits Guide13 Jan 2016, 07:32 AM So do we have to build double mortar pits? Also any tips for random 2vs2 Very good guide In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: B-48 Jan 2016, 15:09 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2016, 02:40 AMMr. Someguy That could work. Another idea taken from history is that an off-map light artillery barrage could be fired at the target first, then the B-4 firing an accurate shot (the light barrage would be tied to the B-4's barrage). The basis for that is the Soviets used other Howitzers to range the targets, then altered the calculations for the B-4, which was then fired and was as a result extremely accurate. While historically using lighter Howitzers to barrage served to disguise the upcoming attack by zeroing in for the B-4, in-game it would serve as an alert that a B-4 is about to fire on that area instead. That can also work as well It will also make the B-4 unique,and the best part is there is counterplay which means the player receiving the shot can prevent it or/and dodge it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AEC7 Jan 2016, 19:46 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2016, 06:56 AMpugzii relic plz Why should Relic listen to a Bolton ?? "Joking" I believe the Aec could use More HP and maybe a little bit AI since it costs that much. A turret rotation speed buff could also do the trick In: COH2 Balance
Thread: B-47 Jan 2016, 19:36 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 23:26 PMMr. Someguy I don't know how anyone can consider giant RNG Bombs to be balanced, this unit has zero consistency and, ironically, seems to avoid hitting the center of the circle on purpose. I test fired it once and out of 10 shots, the center was unscathed while the area around it was completely wrecked. This thing needs some consistency, the RNG-ness of this unit can win or lose you a game, and both players have very little control over that. This is a unit that can decide a game, based entirely on RNG. I suggested a way to add the accuracy it needs WITH counterplay The same way free UKF howitzer are balanced In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied 1v1 Dominace7 Jan 2016, 12:37 PM We must first nerf/rework all Snipers,then move that power to other units (grenadiers,UC,Penals),as for late game a simple solution would be to give vehicles side armour. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied 1v1 Dominace6 Jan 2016, 12:11 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 11:30 AMJohnnyB The point was explained in several posts by Ciez and Vindicarex. Don't try to discredit one of the best threads until now in COH2.org. Oh, wait, manny concepts explained by them could hurt your beloved side (Allied that is). British side* I want honourable Axis and Strategists to explain to me the point of this thread and not Axis lovers like you who only know to insult others and cause "fire" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied 1v1 Dominace6 Jan 2016, 11:13 AM What's the point of this thread again ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: t34 76 now useless27 Dec 2015, 21:58 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 21:40 PMCookiezNcreem T34 is really good vs USF In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor too much?27 Dec 2015, 00:56 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 00:49 AMmiragefla Only issue with the Comet aside from its bugging abilities that have ridiculous range at 80 is its rear armour is high at 180 which is better than most medium tanks, on par with a stock PIV. Sure its a flanker and all that, but it makes the poor Panzer IV cry when its bouncing rear shots off the Comet which should still be punished for showing its butt to enemy fire. All heavy tanks and vehicles could use a rear armour reduction though. or better add side armor In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor too much?27 Dec 2015, 00:55 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 00:10 AM__deleted__ Hey there! So here we have the mighty british medium tank, the Comet. Which in real life had 70-102 mm frontal armor (around 70 in the front of the chassis, and 102 on the front of the turret). On the other hand, we have the Jagdpanzer4, which in real life had the 75mm PaK42 cannon, and used the PzGr.39/42 (a armor-piercing capped ballistic capped shell [APCBC]) which was able to penetrate a 149mm thick steel at 1000m, and 168mm at 500m. However, in the game, the Jagdpanzer have a really hard time penetrating the frontal armor of the Comet, and doing damage. By hard time I mean 8 out of 10 shots will bounce. I'm not even mentioning that the Comet almost never bounces from the sloped (!!!) frontal armor of a Panther, but the Panther bounces pretty nicely from the 90° frontal armor of the Comet...physics at it's finest... In my opinion, a little bit of nerf would be handy, not too much, just make every second shot go through, and cause damage, from the Jgdpz4. Best regards. lets forget for a fact that the Panther bounces AP shells from the ISU-152 a known multi-role assault gun that could be used as a heavy tank destroyer and bust any medium/heavy tank the Axis had. Or how inaccurate and unreliable the IS-2 is at penetrating Panthers armor with its 122mm gun. or how we have special high explocive penetrating rounds for the KT gun WHILE the elefant and the Pak 43 do not. if it was a full blown simulator you wouldnt be seeing Comets hitting your tanks but Fireflys one shotting them. In the end if you cant beat the arcade comet you wont beat the real life Firefly. in other words a realistic simulator wouldnt solve your problem but ADD EVEN MORE PROBLEMS to begin with. so its best to accept the game as it is and understand theirs RNG involved in every fight that can affect the outcome of a battle. In: COH2 Balance