Profile of Nabarxos

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 392

General Information


Thread: What did i miss since Make War...12 Jun 2016, 17:14 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2016, 17:04 PMMajorBloodnok You've got the link to the patch notes. Stop being la-zy! In: Lobby
Thread: What did i miss since Make War...12 Jun 2016, 16:58 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2016, 12:23 PMArray Well not a lot (yet). Maxim spam got nerfed and we got the new war spoils system. HOWEVER in the next month a big patch will hit that is fairly radical by relic patch standards cant believe i didnt miss anything important In: Lobby
Thread: What did i miss since Make War...12 Jun 2016, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2016, 10:04 AMMajorBloodnok Read on from February 11th 2014 lol Sir you just made me laugh i meant since this years make war not love In: Lobby
Thread: What did i miss since Make War...12 Jun 2016, 09:47 AM Good morning COH2.ORG members (and non members) i was gone for a while from COH2 and kinda lost touch with it,could any helpful player keep me up to date with the balance changes since the make war not love event so i can hopefuly reduce my failure rate? In: Lobby
Thread: Unreliable Walking Stuka damage against mortar emplacements18 Feb 2016, 17:10 PM The walking stuka can only damage the 17 pounder (take half of its health) seems the rockets unless all of them hit one emplacement won't do much damage In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Fixing the Brits16 Feb 2016, 17:13 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2016, 17:10 PMAerohank No, the Leig simply (hard)counters all british emplacements. Leig gets +15 range at vet 1 which makes it super effective against mortar pits. A single Leig will force brace and repairs. Simply tell it to attack ground on the mortar pit and it will go away. Double Leigs counters all emplacement play, and will also destroy them fairly quickly unless the opponent uses Stead Fast and rushes heavy royal engineers. Triple Leigs will destroy even the most determined emplacement user. I believe the ISG gets +5range not 15 cause it's insane In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fixing the Brits15 Feb 2016, 15:52 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2016, 08:22 AMSvanh I haven't actually touched Brace. The reason the Bofors and Mortar Pit have less health in Brace after my changes is because Brace's main effect is to reduce incoming damage by 25%, not give the emplacements more health. I'm sorry if you already knew this, just making sure we're on the same page. The Bofors costs only 10 manpower more than an M5 Halftrack and is significantly more durable and dangerous. I think some reduction in health is justified given that it is the smallest emplacement and has the most health. I reduced both the Mortar Pit's DPS and health by 25% to justify the 25% reduction in price to this forum. I agree that two 25% nerfs are a bit much. Thank you for the correction on the Pak43's pop cost. I still think 15 pop is better for heavy AT guns like the 17 Pounder/Pak43 but that's an issue for a "Fixing the OKW" thread. What do you think of increasing the 17 Pounder's health from 900 to 1000? It's less problematic than a 1000 health Bofors due to its limited target selection and would let it take one more AT gun shot (two more under brace). Please suggest some changes to my emplacement suggestions. I don't have as much experience with the 17 Pounder and Bofors as I'd like. I love a serious discussion about emplacements Bofors:a static anti air,Anti light vehicle(not light tanks),Anti infantry that is durable and can attack only units in its range and also needs side tech (which you want to make mandatory for next tier which is nice). This unit can be killed with mortars (which both axis factions have)since the bofors can't attack them from such range and light tanks(not armored cars or vehicles) and last flame weapons (not alone) which decimate emplacements. And that's units that arrive sooner and/or at the same time as the bofors. So cost wise and counter wise the bofors is pretty balanced from that point only the stupid barrage needs removal as it breaks the cycle of balance and a size decrease so it can be placed in many more places. 17 pounder: static,heavy at gun,durable. You covered it your self,this unit only attacks vehicles/tanks and is weak to infantry as well as mortars,artillery/rocket artillery. 10-12 cap would be helpful alot more than 15 cap(which is still insane for a static at gun) and then a size decrease to help place it cause currently it's a nightmare to place one while also taking more shoots from artillery which in turn increase the damage it takes,after that its either a slight price decrease or a durability increase or allow it to have a Vickers inside. And lastly mortar pit It's a more balanced sniper that is more dreadful to face,this unit doesn't like moving targets much and also has minimum range,it would make more sence to make it cost 260 and be an emplacement with one mortar with the ability to pay extra for another one(current double mortar pit) and allow it to be built early with out killing gameplay and be build from sections and upgrade with cost after you tech,it's also a nice idea to split durability with the extra mortar upgrade (half current durability with one mortar,current durability with second mortar upgrade). Durability nerfs are just bad cause it basically kills their strength (sacrifice mobility for durability) and also doesn't take into account the extra damage they receive from certain sources while also their inability to react to anything (since brace won't really help the emplacement after that). And think of brace as a retreat action to allow emplacements to survive oneshot abilitys (railway,stutm tiger shot). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fixing the Brits14 Feb 2016, 12:39 PM The emplacement changes you proposed don't fix the British problem to field them or even place them BUT rather reduce their durability dramatically by excusing it cause of brace (which you nerf even harder). This basically allows the enemy to destroy emplacements with ease even in brace mode but you didn't make them cheaper or hell smaller in size(the mortar emplacement price reduction is nothing compared to the nerfs you proposed) Also the Pak 43 is 10pop not 15 and the 17 is VERY BIG you can hardly place it anywhere so your proposed change to it doesn't help it either. The bofors nerf is stupid (more on that below) Emplacements need time to be build and 2 of them need to operate closer on the front lines when ever possible (bofors,17P),the durability nerf you proposed doesn't take into account the extra damage those emplacements receive but also discourage the British player from using them duo to their performance(bad durability,static,late arrival,pricy) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New British Helms Deep commanders12 Feb 2016, 18:00 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2016, 15:32 PMButcher Apply some logical thinking please, you don´t want to understand it seems. You said that mobility wasn´t an essential part of the game -- BUT --> capping points wins you the game and thus is the essential part --> mobile units cap --> emplacements are the manifestation of immobility. Emplacements are support weapons that support your army THEY ARE NOT THE ARMY. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New British Helms Deep commanders12 Feb 2016, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2016, 13:32 PMButcher That´s why not capping the map won you the game, right? Didn't knew using emplacements was all about staying at the base and doing nothing For a minute I thought this was a serious discussion about emplacements In: COH2 Balance