Profile of Nabarxos

What are you trying to say here.



How about them just being equal? The LeFH's positives do not outweigh the ML-20's positives. If they are going to cost them same, take up the same pop cap they need to be similar in performance. If think something costing the same and being objectively worse is okay then well just lol



And that's what it took to give Soviets a good stock army minus like 1 or 2 units.



???

The SU-76 costs less than the StuG III but has better pen and range, Ostheer doesn't even have a TD with 60 range. Soviet light vehicles SHRED Axis light vehicles. Soviet snipers have a reduced ROF because they are shooting at smaller squads and Soviet infantry is very very much not inferior to Axis infantry. Ostheer doesn't even HAVE elite infantry and cons outperform Volks till vet 3 and OKW doesn't even have a mortar.

Stop trying to excuse shitty things NOW with old irrelevant arguments. Sorry but Relic heeded your cries and made Soviets have a good stock army now, you can stop whining (and maybe if you do you will get much better at the game!).

HOLD ON THERE,the entire soviet stock army is awful compared to the werh and okw ones yet i havent seen you complaining about that,EVEN DOCTRINAL UNITS are worse then the german ones,best example is the IS-2 it has more pop cap,costs more and is limited to one YET the panther outperforms it WHICH COSTS LESS MP FUEL AND POP CAP AND HAS NO LIMIT does everything the is-2 does and its a stock unit YET i havent seen you complain about that.

the isu-152 WHICH COSTS EVEN MORE still cant penetrate the panther reliable and reloads longer then a elefant and does less damage to tanks YET i havent seen you complain about it.

the SOVIET SNIPER is a joke compared to the werh one even in durability (yet costs the same) and the werh sniper does better damage compared to its counter part(also the sniper along with the mg42 make usf cry,and no light vechiles fail to kill them cause of that crazy hp buff)and your excuce for this is what squad size?you forgat to mention the reinforce cost it causes to allies then and how it escapes death.

the mortars(both 120MM AND 82MM) are AWFUL compared to the fast firing wiping machine mortar yet costs the same/more and you dont complain about that either.

the shreck eliminates armor play(they even penetrate and damage IS-2s) compared to the ptrs at rifle yet you thing its fine.

the su76 is a joke compared to stugs perfomamnce(range,skills,vet bonus)yet somehow you think its worse.

the t34/76 THE WORST UNIT OF THEM ALL is the WORST STOCK TANK YOU CAN GET AND COMPARED TO PUMAs ITS AWFUL and its vet is also AWFUL yet you dont complain about that.

the su85 accuracy,penetration is awful compared to the cheap stug which you think is being outperfomned by su76s and fails to penetrate panthers,tigers,king tigers(tank detroyer cant damage tanks NOT KILL THEM,DAMAGE THEM*)

OH WE CAN ALSO TALK ABOUT AIR SUPPORT PRICE/PERFOMNCE COMPARED TO SOVIET ONES IF YOU LIKE.

ALSO did you knew that your "outperfomned" howitzer outperforms the B-4 WHICH ALSO COSTS THE SAME??????????????

Now one unit which is better then the AXIS one is some ares NOT ALL you wish it nerfed???

oh OBERCOMMNADO WEST CAN KILL IT WITH (walking stuka,luchs dive,panther dive,infantry support gun) use them!cause if you dont then sept 3rd wont be a happy update for you!

The Flak Track becomes extinct when AT guns hit the field. And the reduced damage of the MG34 has been given is poor against the units it's supposed to be shooting and killing.

MG's are about more than just suppression, they are about killing things in the arc that are dumb enough to stick around. .50 cal's, Maxims, the Dhsk and MG42 can accomplish this task while the MG34 has a much harder time of it.

Just raise the MG34's price and give it it's old damage back. And Allied HMG's come Tuesday will get all the buffs they need to be as successful as the new HMG42.

Their job is to suppress Alex,damage wont save you you know there is a reason mg 42s now dominate allies,thats why the mg34 dominates as well,its not a unit you setup and then expect it to lock down an area and then forget it, its a unit you must use it carefuly and support it.

The AA halftrack suppress and wipes infantry squads and cant be killed easily by allies early on except soviets with their AT gun so its very good,also if you leave it in the open and expect to hold on its own then i am sorry you expect the impossible,its very good and annilates blobs with ease and with proper support it is unstopable early game,with out support its still dangerous but can be killed with AT guns.

the July 21rd patch wont touch the m2hb .50cal(so it still remains useless)the maxim will get bugged fixed and earn the trait to suppress from max range(still wont suppress entire blobs in its field of view)so nothing getting fixed the maxim is still buggy,still cant stop blobs,still costs the same as a mg42 and more then your mg34(which suppress infantry),next patch we will see more shreck blobs then we ever had and HMGs wont be there to stop it.

False.

"Fixed a bug where the Maxim HMG incremental accuracy wasn’t increased along with other HMGs." That means the Maxim will do more damage when there are more models in the area being targeted.

"Maxim nearby suppression multiplier increased from 0.4 to 0.8" Squads will be suppressed from double the distance of the squad being targeted.

Maxim is fine right now and the garrison facing buff helped ALL MG's immensely. On Tuesday Maxims will be boss.

the bug fix will allow it to shoot more targets but this doesnt mean it will supress them good enough

there is no point the suppression effect of the maxim is not as strong as it should be

A buff was needed yes and it comes next patch. The rifle nade got a range nerf and the maxim will shine again. We don't need pure maxim spam back

the buff fixes a bug the maxim had with its targeting it still wont supress blobs like the mg42 and the maxim spam is always hard countered by both factions,also rifle nades lost their extra range at vet 2,they still have better range then other nades and wipe

Hello Company of Heroes 2 community, i am here to discuss about the current performance of allied hmg weapons (maxim and m2hb .50cal)in their role to suppress.

Since the June 23rd the hmg 42 is able to suppress infantry in its field of view very quickly and pin them almost immediately, duo to this you can’t hit it with in its field of view and need to avoid it (working as intended), but while the hmg 42 suppression is very good and able to stop blobs the maxim and the .50cal can’t do it.

HMG Maxim
this hmg(the maxim) has 2 advantages, its quick setup time and its 6 man module, what it doesn’t have is decent suppression and what’s worst it can’t suppress more than squad in its small field of view(compared to the hmg 42 large one and its current performance)it also costs the same as a hmg 42(240 MP) it is also very buggy on retreat(being stuck and unable to move while also being able to be hit),the maxim at its current state cant suppress blobs only a single squad and what’s worst is you don’t actually need to flank it, you see the German factions have a weapon upgrade which is called lmg 42/34 that very reliably kills squad members of the hmg(remember the maxim cant suppress more than 1 squad)all for 60/75 munitions and if that doesn’t help you take it out or just don’t like it then rifle nades or infiltration grenades will do the job so well you will get a free maxim(which most don’t bother using UNLESS they can’t bring their hmg, most prefer to salvage it),duo to the suppression issue soviets can’t handle blobs with it yet it costs the same as a hmg 42? If it was meant to be spammed then why it doesn’t cost less than a hmg 42? I suggest a buff to its suppression just like the hmg 42 so it can do its job (suppress in it small field of view).

M2HB .50 Cal
this machine gun costs more(280 MP) then the maxim(240 MP) AND the mg 42(240MP)yet it can’t suppress reliably in its large field of view and can’t survive because its fragile EVEN IN GREEN COVER the .50 Call is fragile,lmg42/34 kill it in seconds(remember its suppression doesn’t match the 42 but it’s better than the maxim yet still dies to blobs)also if you still don’t want to kill this mg with lmgs you can still try the grenades the German factions get they are a guarantee wipe, what’s more bad about this mg is not its high cost or its arrival, but its fragile nature and its damage to cover units and light armor(it was supposed to hit hard yet is worst then the lmg 42/34 on units with green cover which don’t need setup),except this weapon allies don’t have any other weapon for suppression to handle blobs and are forced to blob to counter it or rush tanks (light or medium). I suggest a suppression buff AND the fragile nature of this hmg being removed (at least at green cover)


Why did I make this topic? Well you see since the June 23rd patch allies encounter hmg 42s and struggle to take it out (Molotov nerf , USF lack of mortar and grenade cost)they are pushed back with this unit very reliably until their medium armor arrive BUT when you do beat it with flanks you see blobs and cant reliably beat it yourself without hmg(the allied HMG weapons!) and end up losing either way, this isn’t a big issue at 1vs1 BUT 2vs2,3vs3,4vs4 it is VERY annoying and for the most part not fun(no fun being treated as second class faction with awful weapons that the enemy can take out with little skill and low resources),Allies need a HMG that can reliably beat the German blob army and force the enemy to use his other units better and stop this a-move bull**** and force them to flank like allies do now and use that mortar or infantry support gun they have to counter heavily protected HMGS and never charge blobs to Allied HMGs field of view.

thank you for reading this wall of text and tell me if you agree or disagree with me and why :-)