Profile of Nabarxos

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 392

General Information


Thread: SU-76 issues10 Aug 2015, 12:02 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 06:57 AMhubewa Please see side story for more relevance to your whinny posts. I'm done replying to you, ive had enough of you cherrypicking points and history. Thank you, I'm not going to reply to you anymore, if you haven't derailed this thread already. My impression of you - you have never played a 1v1/2v2 game, this is your first strategy game, and you're probably either Russian or 12 years old. you are a fool to think you know anything everytime i post WHY that SU-76 is fine you reply to me offending me,and saying that one panther should beat 3-4 SU-76s in company of heroes 2 cause "REAL LIFE FACTS". you FAIL MISERABLY to understand what balance means by confusing real life facts with a video game. this is not a simulator of WW2 but an RTS game based on WW2 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues10 Aug 2015, 06:45 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 06:24 AMhubewa We need a Karma system so I can negrep this guy everytime he posts. The Caps lock is real. Where to start? Side story time (completely exaggerated but i've given up replying seriously to you): And the SU-85 isn't even expensive. And you've got cheap multipurpose mines, so to say you don't have any counters is a bit rich. Also ever heard of flanking? You should try it sometime Firstly, I doubt you even have a 10k 1v1 rank, secondly, ppl ask for nerfs because its doing its job too well. SU-85 340mp and fueal 120,inaccurate at long range,penetration is the same as a zis-3,160 damage,good vet,has no turret,need to have 3-4 of them do kill a panther(2 is just full of rng)not very good for its price to handle a panther alone so it fails to combat a medium tank cost effectively let me remind you what TANK DESTROYERS DO! "A tank destroyer or tank hunter is a type of armoured fighting vehicle, armed with a direct-fire artillery gun or missile launcher, with limited operational capacities and designed specifically to efficiently engage enemy armoured vehicles in a cost-effective manner." the SU-85 cant not engage the panther alone and doesnt have enougn penetration to destroy it and i will repeat it again IT IS NOT A REAL LIFE SIMULATOR,THERE IS NO SIDE ARMOR SO FLANKS ARE POINTLESS ON A PANTHER especially with TURRETLESS ANK DESTROYERS! you dont know a thing about tanks and company of heroes 2 so quit whining and adapt and use your other units instead of demanding nerfs to a unit for doing its job. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues10 Aug 2015, 05:26 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2015, 20:33 PMhubewa So nabarxos, you're telling me that because such tank is labeled as TDs, SU-76s can deal with, I don't know, T-54s, Maus, Rattes, Abrams and so on. You know, there is such things as weapons being obsolete and when the Panthers and Tigers appeared, that's what it was starting to become (that's if those vehicles didn't break down en route LOL) Throwing more shit at a wall isnt going to help you. That's what the Russians learned in 1941. this is why you dont know a thing about balance! this is not a real life simulator,deal with it! now from your saying HALF if not ALL of the soviet stock units INCLUDING the ZIS-3(soviets main AT gun) shouldnt not even penetrate the panther and soviets should just spam one expencive unit(SU-85s) to counter your supirior tank right?? WRONG!!!!!that kills balance I wouldnt mind having to flank to hit the side armor in order to deal with the panther if i had alot of su-76s,after all the panthers side armor was WORSE then a t34-76 BUT SIDE ARMOR doesnt exist in COH 2 so......... anyways what you just said is stupid,you just confirmed how little you know about balance and equality yet demand a units performance to be nerfed CAUSE its doing its job. and this cant be justified "CAUSE REAL LIFE" IT CANT WHEN ALL THE UNITS THE SOVIETS HAVE ARE NOT FIT TO COMBAT THE PANTHER COST-EFFECTIVELY!!!! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bazooka accuracy buff?9 Aug 2015, 09:09 AM The Bazookas are AT handhelds just like the shreacks,they should have the same stats on penetration and the bazooka should have 100 damage. this will help the Americans to deal with tanks that dont have very good Anti-Infantry power(panther,elefant,jagdpanzer 4),since the only way to damage those tanks is with the jackson ONLY and that tank needs support to do anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bazooka accuracy buff?9 Aug 2015, 09:05 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2015, 08:47 AMErguvan hitting more = higher damage and more penetration indirectly the stats to its damage and penetration dont allow that In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues9 Aug 2015, 09:01 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2015, 05:19 AMdaspoulos Queen do you have memory of a fly? I have never agreed with stug TWP or JP4 alien cloak, and have always suggested on how to change that. What I am saying is that the Su85 shouldn't be an armor negater. A unit that for so cheap can force off anything that isn't a jp4, elefant, or a jagdtiger. Because currently for only 120-125 fuel, high dps, and 60 range. Making it an autopen vehicle is not a good idea for obvious reasons, otherwise an axis player may ask, "why the fuck even buy a panther or King tiger, if they just become pinatas with effectively zero armor that can't engage whats shooting at them dealing consistent damage every 4.25? seconds for a lot less. You want more buffs? Try accuracy, try turn rate, try something else. Because if there is one thing about the su85 that is already quite good. Its the damage output. You know, unlike a lot of people I don't try to fein an underlying agenda through my posts. I post exactly what I think and why, not cuz I'm trying to push some reich agenda for hitler or the glory of michael wittmann. this is why the Su-85 doesnt need a price increase BUT a penetration increase "A tank destroyer or tank hunter is a type of armoured fighting vehicle, armed with a direct-fire artillery gun or missile launcher, with limited operational capacities and designed specifically to efficiently engage enemy armoured vehicles in a cost-effective manner" it cant penetrate reliably the panther and need 2 su-85 to force it to retreat,which by that time you spent more resources then the german spent just to counter his tank. unless fuel and mp income on the sovets increases,i dont see a reason increasing the price of the su-85 WHILE buffing its penetration In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues9 Aug 2015, 08:55 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2015, 02:25 AMhubewa Yep, after this I'm almost certain we're playing completely different games. Do you know how many SU-76s you can build before you get vetted p4s or a panther in a 1v1? With the current SU-76, 2-4 (the number you can build) can deal with panthers frontally no problem. Moving the t34-76 to tier 4 is a bit lazy, and I'm not sure why they did it, it should be in T3 with the old prices and nothing would really change. ATM, the SU-76 does a lot more than harrass heavy tanks with ROF - considering timings, its possible to get enough SU-76s to kill heavy tanks in a 1v1. Its not even a contest. as i said 2 su-76 cant beat a panther,3 and up give it a beating. Heavy tanks supported DESTROY su-76s,yet you believe alone they should decimate them. you expect a tank to destroy tank destroyers,tell me how balanced is this?explain to me why the SU-76 shouldnt penetrate the panther when massed?? also in your very example you told us how AWFUL you are at 1vs1,by the time you bring the panther in a 1vs1 if the soviet players didnt make mistakes you have already lost,you expect 1 unit to counter everything even its counters and turn the game to your favor like it does with the americans. the only thing you repeat is that the panther shouldnt lose to 4 Su-76,you clearly have no idea what TANK DESTROYERS let me tell you what they do "A tank destroyer or tank hunter is a type of armoured fighting vehicle, armed with a direct-fire artillery gun or missile launcher, with limited operational capacities and designed specifically to efficiently engage enemy armoured vehicles in a cost-effective manner." READ BELOW! "Tanks are generally armoured fighting vehicles designed for front-line combat which combine operational mobility and tactical offensive and defensive capabilities and perform all primary tasks of the armoured troops on the battlefield; the tank destroyer on the other hand is specifically designed mainly for taking on enemy armour" tell me should tank destroyers lose to panthers?? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues8 Aug 2015, 23:51 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 21:08 PMmiragefla 1. Puma's an anti-armour vehicle. Even then, unless the Puma kites which lowers accuracy and increases the chance it will deflect, T-34 is a cheap generalist(?) tank which generally uses its treads as a weapon and can meatshield for all those assault guns and TDs it can be bought alongside with now. 2. SU-85 has ROF, self-sight and generally performs well against true heavies, just not blitzing Panthers(but what does?). Boost its accuracy and its mobility and it still probably wouldn't be fine as the SU-76 still would be out more output via numbers unless you lost a few early on as they can pen heavy armour just as well, which should be the SU-85s role. To deal with heavies/medium heavies. Also how will nerfing the SU-76 make it useless if say, the penetration was just adjusted? Even if it was dropped to something like 180/160/150-140 it would still counter the majority of mediums, even at range and be a cheap support platform that can do many things. And you still have that very fast rate of fire you help put shots into armour. Also, only time T-34/76/85s will be facing Panthers is against OKW who can actually rush them out around the 15 minute mark or so unless you're in the larger game modes where balance is already tosed out the window by the income. sorry it will only kill anything that isnt a vetted panzer 4 or a panther. ever used the AT gun of the americans?if you find that AT gun fine against panthers you clearly dont understand how awful of an idea it is to nerf penetration. the t34-76 is useless,you might as well make it free. the su-85s self spot is nice IF IT COULD HIT AT LONG RANGE and the penetration is awful against panthers(honestly why are panthers NON doctrinal anyways??) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bazooka accuracy buff?8 Aug 2015, 20:45 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 20:42 PMThe Big Red 1 that is if it can hit something which 80-90% of the time it doesn't while the panzershreck can then whats the point of hitting your target if you cant damage it? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bazooka accuracy buff?8 Aug 2015, 20:40 PM no they should have better penetration and damage. In: COH2 Balance