Profile of Nabarxos

The Pack Howtzer needs MAJOR buffs,it performes worse then a ISG and 81/82mm mortars yet costs more.
its has very short range(and it has huge minimal firing range,it has AWFUL ACCURACY very RNG depended,it cant retreat,gets decrewed when it loses 4 men and all that for 380 MP XD.
if you think this unit is ok you either have RNG in your favor or just havent used it

No mate i only get mad at people that try to bring up a subject that is not relevant to the argument. so i will try one more time and then i will write you of as lost cause because we repeated the difference between 2 subjects a few times all ready.

Obers are a very powerful lmg squad and second most powerful lmg squad in the game with para's at the top until they reach vet 4. But they are not cost effective if for example shocks where increased to 550 mp they would still be the most powerful cc in the game but nobody would get them.

If i compare a single obersoldat to gren , rifleman or fusilier they are just horribly cost ineffective.

The obers need to cost 40 mp for reinforcement aand perhaps a slight popcap reduction. these are not major buffs.

Paratroopers best lmg squad??are you trolling????

Guns no longer explode till the crew is dead, so you could have recrewed it and THEN had the gun blow up the next time or just had the gun take enough damage (while the crew stayed alive) so that if the crew died THEN it blew up.

The Stuka Zu Fuss requires multiple direct hits to reliably kill it, and on most maps the enemies base won't be in range of your walking Stuka.

Wait,you want counters to COMPLETLY DESTROY the ML-20 that costs 600MP!!! AND needs to be builded!AND IS DOCTRINAL leaving you with stock tanks to deal with panthers and what ever the axis have and you want cheap counters to it??like Close Air Support commander which ELIMINATES ARTILARY PLAY??????and you also want that counter to have the same range of the ml-20??????
?ok then i have the counter you want LUFFWAFE CLOSE AIR SUPPORT it has the tools to harras enemy lines,gives you alot of choices to advance OR DEFEND and has many cool abilitys to take out the howitzer AND if he builded it within his base then make a luch take out the bunkers and BOOM his base is exposed to infantry assaults by fallshimjager.

by decrewing the Ml-20 you make it lose its vet it gained(IF IT GAINED)AND force the soviet players to recrew it(which in turn bleed him MP!),it also disables it(making assaults much safer).

OH one last thing if the stuka was meant to be behind enemy lines then why does it have more health then a katyusha???the stuka has 320HP and is able to survive a tank shot and small arms fire(hell even zooks)the katyusha has 160hp(which is meant to stay behind enemy lines) as you can see if you want to hit the enemy base the stuka has enough hp to survive long enough for the barrage AND still live for repairs.

I dont think you are playing the same game as rest of the players here.

OFC i am not playing vs the CPU A.I,i am playing VS REAL PLAYERS.

^ did you ever play as axis?
Why are you comparing Ele with ISU 152 and when was the last time an Ele killed your capping inf squad from the fog of war?
Panther vs IS2 (Panther has like 90% less dps against inf)

Sniper perform (almost) equal against each others squads (4men vs 6 men squads) but is a lot more squishy

su76 is less expensive then the Stug comes a lot more early and has a free barrage (also Stug is a better TD) (btw su76 has more pen than Stug)

Puma vs T34 - Scout-car vs Tank , you can't compare that

su85 is probably the best TD in the game(besides high vet jagdpanzer4)

air performance, since Alex is mostly complaining that OKW has counter to the ml-20 i would say that allies have the better airforce (you know okw has no aircrafts)

B-4 was nerfed hard but I would say 1-shot potential is worth a lot

OKWs heroic counters
-walking Stuka (100fuel and you have to get close)
-Luchs/Panther rush : maybe possible in 1 on 1 but not in 2 on 2
-infantry support gun now that was a good one


But before the Allied-fanboy-shitstorm hits me with all it's might
I think that SU should get all stock Units buffed and the 1-Shot garbage nerfed

k before i point out every thing you said let me say something,i play BOTH factions k?? got that?? GOOD,to prove it i disliked the King tiger armor nerf so much i quited playing OKW cause that thing was k and the problem which still hasnt been resolved is the shreck!!!!i still havent played them since that patch(played them in the alpha to test changes ONLY THEN after that patch) butfrom axis i only play ost now and oh man they got ALOT of buffs

now the ISU-152 VS ELEFANT comparison,as you are aware the isu-152 has High Explosive and Armor piercing,it also has long reload(9-11 secs) and has a minumum close range at which it cant fire,it costs the same,has less armor,(310 compared to a 400 armor beast) less damage (240 compared to a huge 320) and costs the same!,now my comparision is with the penetration and damage really i never said anything about its anti infantry being leser then a elefant but still we cant ignore the isu-152 has an anti tank mode which clearly cant do much to huge tanks and is for that nor supirior to the elefant ALSO do you know a unit that ALSO costs the same YET doest everything better then the isu-152? KING TIGER! same damage,more armor,no at/ai mode,better pen,better ai,same speed,not the same range BUT has a turret(which i find too slow at times)should the king tiger have ai shells and at shells then?? no it shouldnt but since the isu 152 has those shells when i choose AT ROUNDS I EXPECT IT FOR THAT LONG RELOAD TO DO EITHER HUGE DAMAGE,OR SHOULD ALWAYS PENETRATE k got it? good

the IS-2 has very good Anti Infantry perfomnace compared to the panther ONLY WHEN IT HITS,the gun is inaccurate also the Machine gun upgrade of the is-2 is not as good as the cheap one of the panther yet costs more then the panthers mg 42(with that mg the panther deals better with infantry AND can deal with tanks such the is-2 and isu-152) the panther at the cost of 490Mp 175FUELL outperforms the is-2 at AT and also with the cheap mg at Anti inf,the is-2 costs 640mp 230fuel yet is inaccurate,fails to penetrate the panther a medium tank clearly the IS-2 cant handle mediums as it was supposed to and clearly is being outperformed by a cheap stock unit(cheap compared to the is-2)

the soviet sniper is not as good as the werh one,they are both snipers also the soviet one will also encounter 5/6 man squads and suddly becomes useless YET your werh sniper is "balanced" its not like it will eliminate variaty to the usf or kill complitly soviets yet also survive a succesful flank with that ridiculus hp,also the soviet snipers "durability"when it loses a soldier and you retreat it YOU MUST REINFORCE THE SNIPER SQUAD and it aint cheap WHILE werh sniper only needs healing and BOOM ready to join the war effort,the only strength the soviet has is a 2 soldier squad that is also hardly a strength when they die faster then a lone werh sniper facing shock troops.

Puma Vs T34-76,of course you can compare it the puma a light vechile is more mobile,deals and penetrates the t34 yet costs less mp then it AND COMES FASTER great job the main battle tank of the soviets is even more delayed and can also be killed VERY RELIABLY by a dam Puma,if you find it funny or stupid then clearly you havent played soviets or havent used the t34-76 after the tech changes,i would suggest you play 20 matches of 2vs2 and up us soviets and use the t34-76 and tell me how much you vetted every one you made and how much it lasted

the SU-85 is only good against medium tanks (excluding panther),it has TERRIBLE long range accuracy(might as well remove its long range)penetration is awful against heavys and panthers,apart from that a cheap stug does everything the su-85s and has better skills(if not the creazy reload vet 2 the su 85 gets) and comes earlier.clearly having a greater price tag helps it to the eyes of many be "ok" and supirior

OKW has 1 airforce ability that strafe run an enemy sector,drop smoke,and drop fallschirmjagers for 250 munations(aint cheap but still is not awful and not easily counterable by allies).

the B-4 is only good if it hits(just like the is-2) if it doesnt then i am sorry its not worth a 600mp price tag and that long cooldown it has,the vet ability is good vsTanks but still needs clear field of view,again this is the lottery machine you either do HUGE DAMAGE or just end up losing your money to the RNG machine

Again Okw have counters yet you somehow expect them to be cheaper,in my opinion you expect too much,the walking stuka is a mobile rocket artillary instawipes infantry and comes veary early,its also very mobile and all that for 100 fuel,if it was cheaper or OKW didnt had fuel problems then we would have the walking stuka spam problem allies faced at vCOH,it instawipes a ml-20 crews and with the second strafe the gun itself.
the LUCH and PANTHER both can dive enemy lines and still survive and also kill the gun,in 2vs2,3vs3s,4vs4 its even easier really and more safe,1vs1s its just downright hard.
the ISG is a 330mp mortar that has long range and good accuracy and fire very fast,if you manage(especialy in 1vs1)to keep the front you can use it to kill the howitzer but still sometimes RNG can favor the enemy ,in 2vs2s and up its not an easy counter so yea its mostly a reliable counter to 1vs1 games against ML-20.

su-76 pen compared to the stug is slightly better(VERY SLIGHTLY)so much so its actually doesnt make an impact on the game,but yes you are correct its better then the stugs.