Profile of MrBananaGrabber.

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 328

General Information


Thread: demo charge bonus damage against uncrewed support weapons27 Aug 2018, 16:00 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2018, 15:57 PMSander93 Make them cheaper, reduce damage but give them more utility like destroying cover, obstacles and uncrewed team weapons and whatever. Trying to balance them as a squad wiping tool will never work, as the countless past changes confirm. That sounds perfect, better to give them some use rather than leave them as virtually useless. This is a good compromise to make them worthwhile and give them tactical use again. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: demo charge bonus damage against uncrewed support weapons27 Aug 2018, 15:28 PM 65 now, and in the early and mid game it would be very useful. That's exactly the time when you want to deny them support weapons but don't have an AT gun in position (and even when you do it takes awhile) or good enough/safe armour yet. If you don't have time to safely steal it, and know they are about to re-take it you can destroy it. There have been loads of times I've needed to do that in 1vs1s. It would make demos useful and finally give them utility beyond blowing up buildings. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: demo charge bonus damage against uncrewed support weapons27 Aug 2018, 03:01 AM Camo in cover would be great, but doesn't really change the original problems much, as there is enough cover on maps to still be able to use them to easily wipe squads. But if the other change of 'only' causing them to wipe several models in a squad could be added you'd have a more balanced and really useful demo charge again (you could make them easily detectable by sweepers at a larger range to reward good play). That plus the ability to destroy a support weapon with one demo would make them useful again and more tactical. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: demo charge bonus damage against uncrewed support weapons26 Aug 2018, 15:36 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2018, 15:29 PMMittens Oooooooooooooof It's so true, they went from being blob annihilators and panther killers to virtually useless. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: demo charge bonus damage against uncrewed support weapons26 Aug 2018, 14:42 PM It would certainly be a lot more useful than whatever they can be used for now. In 1vs1 and 2vs2 it would be a really helpful ability to have. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: demo charge bonus damage against uncrewed support weapons25 Aug 2018, 15:32 PM If one demo charge could be used to destroy an uncrewed support weapon it would give them more utility through an entire match. Just an idea. As someone who used to always use a demo charge + mine combo I miss having a reason to use demo charges now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander concepts.13 Aug 2018, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2018, 04:25 AMTiger Baron This is nice, but the designated command vehicle is in an odd spot or did you add it for the recon ability? And Relic sort of teased the British mortar already so that's probably going in the land matress' place. Also, this commander got a name? Maybe special Operations Regiment? Yes, recon for the mattress, that and because there are very few abilities for the UK (or US/OWK) which is the downside to there being so few commanders for the newer armies. Someone suggested allowing cross-overs with certain abilities to make up for the lack of variation, which I certainly agree with. Special Operations Regiment is a great name and sums it up well. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander concepts.12 Aug 2018, 21:19 PM In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander concepts.7 Aug 2018, 18:41 PM In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF COMMANDER REVAMP DISCUSSION1 Aug 2018, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2018, 11:30 AMSeroth Have you ever used the P47 strafing? It is utterly garbage. Please rethink also, who the hell would have the fuel to get all of those out? You need 2 max tanks type no more. The strafe is painfully hit and miss, it could have the cost inceased and be changed to two planes loitering. As for the tanks, the idea isn't to build all of them like someone suffering from OCD, the point is that it has most mid to late game situations covered. I would rather have the M10 replaced by the Easy8, but then there would be no M10 in the game. In: Lobby