Profile of Latch

The discussion is far from over. OKW didnt get snares til the removal of shrecks. Before that they didnt need them. Whith the new change to piats, i believe the brits dont need snares

Still feel OKW need smoke? What did it take for OKW to get an MG, a P4, flame nade? Don't forget that OKW has better tanks than UKF along with better AT options. Faust, shreck Mines and rak.

The problem is similar to the OKW base defences. OKW can yolo into the enemy base with a tank/luchs and provided there are no AT options, just cause havock. Try that with a sherman or cromwell (not even going to mention light vehicles) and the base defences damage the tank, then you will get fausted and killed by the base defences.

Back to why no snares on UKF are similar, Germans can push into their lines, knock out X/Y and run back, do that as UKF and chances are, you just got snared. The lack of snares gives no punishment to manoeuvres like that. "But you have mines!" I'd rather have a snare, mines whilst good are not reliable, it requires the tank to drive over them and they are countered by infantry, smart driving, indirect fire or sweepers.

By all means keep the game asymmetrical but give each faction the core stuff - Smoke, snares, mines and flamers. Think about it, if they gave flamers to every faction, you wouldn't have needed the noob nade to flush out garrisons that OKW struggled with but no, they didn't need that did they.

Did anyone actually read Relics own words as to the reason for unlocking snares faster for OKW? Even with them, they feel they come too late... Against what? The SU HT? But having a T0 AT gun isn't a good enough option?

Like I said before, maybe PIATS will fix this, maybe it won't I cant get games in WBP and the AI isn't exactly good to play against but stopping a faction from having a core tool is just plain daft. Give OKW smoke, give UKF snares, two fundamentals that each faction sorely lacks.

I imagine this is universal but it happens to me 100% with the vickers and I think the commandos, I know another UKF unit is affected by this at least I just forget which.

Anyway, if you que up to reinforce a vickers squad and as they are reinforcing tell them to move (still whilst in the bounds of the reinforcement area) the new member simply wont spawn, only what you press stop will the member immediately appear.

I can't say for certain if this happens to ALL members (E.g you can move around reinforcing all but the last member) but I can 100% say that it does this for the last member to be reinforced.

I didn't make this thread for me. I personally have no problem with it. The problem is that everyone else on the Steam forums doesn't like it. If you bothered to read that discussion, you'll see that I was not the one who started complaining about the Churchill, in fact, you'll see me say it's good (though not Comet good). I just made this thread to see if the powers that be think about it, because no one else will. Everytime someone complains about the Churchill, the 25Ibers or the gliders being shit on those forums, I attempt to formulate strategies to make them work. Churchill? Make it command vehicle, build a 17 pounder near it or build a firefly (though an AVRE would probably fare better). 25 Pounders? I admit, they might be beyond saving, but airburst shells and paired with an assault on a point/OKW base would make them fulfil some sort of role. Maybe not well.
Glider? Land it during an assault behind the enemy or on a point close to the frontline, not make it land on a point far behind the lines like Airborne. Sure, maybe people don't like these strategies, but I'm the one trying to make the bad situations better. Better then just saying, fuck it, it's useless.
Back off topic, keep your petty personal problems with me off these forums.

Do people lack the ability to use .org themselves that they instead have a spokesperson who hates the site, to come to the site and make a thread on a topic that they themselves don't agree with despite disagreeing with me when I state why it only needs a slight armour increase?

So you build a Churchill turn it into a command vehicle, then build a 17 Pdr or instead of a firefly build an AVRE and you think the problem lies with the Churchill? Sorry, other people that you speak for think that the Churchill is the problem?

Why are you talking about gliders? Keep it on topic, sheesh

Back off topic, keep your petty personal problems with me off these forums.

No, I simply refuse to say nothing to someone who shits all over a place that does a whole lot for a game I love and expects to be treat like a special snowflake with no mention of it, I think I have a rite to let people know just what you really think of a site you only use so "the powers that be" will MAYBE look at your 'well thought out' topics.

Or here talking about this very post:

http://steamcommunity.com/app/231430/discussions/0/144513248280832132/?ctp=6#c144513524085502163

So would you kindly, get a thicker skin. If you want to give it you have to learn to take it.

Eh, a vet Pak40 is easily punched out by a molotov and a few decoy conscripts..
Plus that 6 pounder can have the cancer upgrade and has a garrison (throw in some tommies with a Vickers and its lethal as)

You mean the 17 Pdr, 6pdr is the portable one. Even with that said, p40 > 17P simply for its ability to shoot through shotblockers, that shit's OP as fuck if its placed/defended well. At least with the 17 you need LOS and no shot blockers until vet 1... Vet 1 17Lbr, that will be the day...