Profile of bicho1

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 168

General Information
Steam: 76561198038199828


Thread: Any opinions on the new USF mortar?18 Jun 2016, 11:57 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2016, 23:08 PMIncendiaryRounds LOL I can't help but say l2p for this post. Dual mgs can only guard a small part of the map. Just cap the rest of the map since the Ost player will have less units to deal with the other parts of the map. And I'm saying that you need up to 3 inf squads to overwhelm an mg. You may just need one. It all depends. Maybe you caught the mg out of position. So when you know theres an mg in a position, don't expect to just send one squad and think it'll beat the mg. You can only afford to attack one mg at a time early game cuz you wouldn't have enough units to attack another. So no, you don't need 9 riflemen. Again, clearly your thought process tells me its an l2p issue. dont use this cheap excuse L2p issue when you are out of thoughts i have lots of games of 1 v 1 i kinda know how to play, i am not the only one thinking like this ,i have been talking to some high rank players 150 -50. "Dual mgs can only guard a small part of the map. Just cap the rest of the map since the Ost player will have less units to deal with the other parts of the map" you dont need all the map ,even only the fuel point and some tac points are good enough "survive" early mid game then late game its gg for you . In: Lobby
Thread: Any opinions on the new USF mortar?17 Jun 2016, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2016, 15:41 PMIncendiaryRounds If the Ostheer player is using a mg to backup another, the USF player should just ignore that area until he get pack howis. That's 520 mp guarding a small area of the map. A single mg in even the best position can be broken with 3 inf squads from different directions. Dear USF players: you can't have the whole map! "the USF player should just ignore that area until he get pack howis" so i need to w8 until i will get a pack howy and only then i can play ? isant it insane ? "single mg in even the best position can be broken with 3 inf squads from different directions" wtf so i need 3 rifelman squads to break thro 1 mg who will fight your greens ? RE ? cap ? if you got 2 mgs and 3 green squads for every mg i need 3 for every green squad i need 1 [3+3+1+1+1=9 so i need 9 rifelman squads to win you, gonna start blobing again ] if usf player tries to flank you shoot his troops down its thet ez if he shoots smoke you allwase can back your troops or re position your troops are stronger long range usf allways need to come closer but on the way they will lose models In: Lobby
Thread: Any opinions on the new USF mortar?17 Jun 2016, 22:14 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2016, 17:00 PMIncendiaryRounds Soviets have a harder time dealing with mgs. Molotovs don't insta-kill mg crew. Conscripts don't flank as well cuz their rifles aren't semi-auto (don't deal as much damage.) They don't have non-doctrinal smoke so, soviets deserve a mortar. wtf ??!! from when a granade insta kill an mg crew ??? molotove is much more effective then a nade did you ever tried puting your MG in a biulding ? some times 3 nades wont insta kill your mg crew wermaht greens are preaty good vs rifelman ust put them in green cover then give them LMG and gg In: Lobby
Thread: [Ost] Rebalance16 Jun 2016, 11:57 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2016, 09:53 AMWiderstreit Hey, since may-balance-patch it is clear, Ostheer has some balancing problems. It is my favorit fraction, but they are too difficult to play for most players. It needs a redesign like OKW, my Suggestion: T0: Pioniere, Grenadiere T1: MG34, Sniper, leIG18 T2: Panzergrenadiere, 222, 251, PaK40 T3: Panzer IV, StuG III, Ostwind T4: Panzerwerfer, Brummbär, Panther, Tiger - Osttruppen: bunker changed with sandbags - Pioniere: weapon (K98) - Grenadiere: T0 grenade Model.24 - Grenadiere: bunker removed - MG42: switched with MG34 - Mortar: switched with leIG18 - Panzergrenadiere: 2-Ost-Schrecks changed with 1-West-Schreck - 222: more sight non-doc - Ostwind: main-gun can suppress (aoe:4, needed shots: ~6) - Panther: range buff to 55. - Tiger: non-doctrianl (max. 2 at same time. Cooldown of 20min to build next one) - Trench changed with CoH1 model, same stats as Brits-bunker. Cost 50mp. MG can't be garrisoned. - Scope removed. - StuG and Elefant: Tankhunter-view like Soviet. Changes for other fractions: US: Easy8 non-doctrianl Soviet: T34/85 non-doctrinal Brits: - OKW: leIG18 switched with Mortar34. MG34 switched with MG42. What do you think? Of course, the units need other changes. But the superficial fraction-design?= USF -pershing armor buf ,decrease relod time -rangers free tompsons cos panzergreens get free SMG guns [or give panzergreens regular rifels and for some ammo they can get upgraded with there smgs ] -oo and some hp buf for jaksonpls and for the poor shermans In: COH2 Balance
Thread: BARs on Rangers?15 Jun 2016, 13:17 PM why rangers don't get free thompson's like panzergreens from wermaht they are pretty cheap for their performance they eat usf troops without salt they get powerful smgs thet rape clsoe to mid range wtf some one here think panzergreens should get regular rifles and only for an upgrade they would get smgs just like rangers ? In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Germans much easier to play as Allies/Usf/Soviets15 Jun 2016, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2016, 11:24 AMDedbabab I would argue it is the soviet faction, from the start of the game all of there units have been nerfed and everything they have is squishy.. at least ostheer has solid units best AT in the game HMG thats much better than maxim a mortar that literally wipes squads.. also it has bunkers and very good defensive capabilities. alot of micro has to be puted in the mg42 thet covers only half of the map ... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Germans much easier to play as Allies/Usf/Soviets15 Jun 2016, 11:18 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2016, 10:08 AMgeist Because grens are known to be so strong. Throw a smoke, blob in with your rifle blob. Easy. you dont say problem is its not allways so easy you maybe forgot greens can move + mostly there is a tank and an mg shooting at you should i smoke them too? until i will smoke every one there, my troops will die or i will use all my ammo then when i am out of ammo what should i do + when usf rifelman shoot there smoke nade they have to stay at place =more time for the greens to get back or reposition In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Germans much easier to play as Allies/Usf/Soviets15 Jun 2016, 05:42 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2016, 04:03 AMHax0rJimDuggan items...but wait...here you go....have a smoke grenade, GL HF! yep you are right .. the smoke granade part nice one In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Germans much easier to play as Allies/Usf/Soviets14 Jun 2016, 10:41 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2016, 10:18 AMElSlayer For me it is USF because of squishy armor and lots of abilities (vehicle crew, smoke barrage, HVAP, switching shell types, etc). But IMO hardest to play =/= highest micro requirement. you forgot about usf paper armor late game vs heavy nazi tanks while the german player is "controlling""microing" his mgs to stand still and his tanks to stand with there front armor one clicking with his LMG greens on ur rifleman [a lot of micro going on for the wehrmacht army] you are trying to break through with all your force to flank his tanks and now you can insert the "ability micro" your rifleman lose while they are tring to come close at long range to one click greensLMG wipe + wehrmacht HMGS your ATGS bounse every shoot, ur tanks made of paper ... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rule of 213 Jun 2016, 08:45 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 05:51 AMMissCommissar That's actually right, that you can call only 1 heavy at once. Not sure, that it should be changed somehow. But... I see problem with that limit and some medium tanks. Panther, Comet and Churchill - they are not really much different from heavy tanks. Churchill itself is uber-heavy (if we look at HP), Comet performs like little downgraded version of Tiger 1 with seriously buffed range of fire and Panther is really near to be called "Heavy". And all those "mediums" are not limited at all! What do you think - should they be limited as "medium-heavy" tanks somehow? P.S. Funny case with KV-series tanks. They all are "heavy", but limited only KV-2. It's not such a big deal, of course, but looks really strange... commet <tiger\panther Churchill isant so sceary he is just there pershing <panther\tiger pershing is a heavy tank in this game, panther wins it 1 v 1 so ye pls limit panther thx In: COH2 Gameplay