Profile of Zyllen

With respect to USF, however, it is easy to see that USF infantry should be more cost-effective than OKW infantry, because OKW late-game vehicles are more cost-effective and way less micro-intensive than the USF paper-fleet.

I agree with your assessment of the usf riflemen. but if riflemen are supposed to be the strongest line infantry then the vg's should be the second strongest. The reason for that are simple. every other aspects of the okw early game is inferior to the usf: lv's support weapons teching and early tanks are all inferior.

Now the whole OKW faction is simply falling to pieces without its shreks as these problems have been their for a long time but where masked by the effects the shrek had on the game. the following needs to happen in my opinion.

buff the mp44 upgrade to mirror the pg stg.
the okw flacktruck needs some buffs
and the price reversal of the tanks.

Yes. Relic them selves kept repeating this during their interviews, streams, patch notes, forum etc. It is gardening everywhere.

Even if you what you say is true is it good idea to have a faction to have the weakest mainline infantry weakest support weak lv's , expensive tech and over expensive tanks ? i dont think so.
Its better to ask if the okw is balanced i dont find it so for reasons above.

Where is the advantage for playing the okw? at this moment the ostheer does everything better.

I'd written a long post about why Zyllen was wrong about everything but the forum lost it. So I will simply say gtfo of the balance forum until you have half a clue what is going on in the game (and how to do basic maths!)

Lol your kind of cute like a barking puppy.

No.
Only because you want Volks to be these uber soldiers with Vet5, doesn't meant Relic intended them to be. According to their OKW design philosophy you are support your mediocre basic infantry with other units like elites or vehicles. The same way Soviets do.

WTF are you talking about ? the okw has always been about strong heavy hitters on the front and weak support . and thats the reason why the leigh and mg34 and lv's have always been inferior to the allied counterparts.

if you tell me that the okw is meant to be played like the soviets then you are liar or dont play the game.

Vet 5 means a lot because it offers real bonuses, I fail to see how it is inferior.

you are being deliberately vague here because you know are talking out of your ass. even the
penals who cost exactly as much as a volks have better offensive vet then volks. while the riflemen outclasses them completely in durability.

Volks are meant to be outclassed,

says who?

OKW is an meant to an Elite army, you are supposed to rely on your elite infantry in the late game once you acquire enough vet.

Obers are not going to automatically fix the situation.

They do hold their own, they allow you to stall, they trade very effectively when in cover,

every unit does. wtf you should know this as " strategist"

and they come in a faction with plentiful options to support (you have more than MG34).

oh wow the mg34 and the leigh now lets compare it the usf mortar and the 50 cal. or the maxim and the 81 mm . or the mg42 and the 80mm.

You are being deliberately intellectually dishonest again. you know the okw support units are completely inferior to the support units the other factions can bring to the field.

The tech is inline with other factions (how is it not?).

it now cost 900 mp to get all 3 trucks. no biggie right

OKW has been far too powerful for too long, it is now just coming in line with other factions.

you can better say the volks shreks was the only thing keeping the okw up. now its removed the okw has no advantage in any field being completely outclassed in infantry support weapons lv's and tanks. in time this will show on coh 2 charts . i will be proven right and you should turn in that strategist badge if you dont realise that.