Profile of Kamzil118

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 455

General Information
Register Time: 28 Mar 2015, 03:09 AM
Last Visit Time: 24 Aug 2021, 21:13 PM
Website: https://forums.spacebattles.com/members/kamzil118.322196/
Steam: 76561197988442685
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Detroit
Game Name: Kamzil

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Units escaping certain death with only %1 health left25 May 2016, 23:10 PM Jump back to quoted post25 May 2016, 21:52 PMIntelligence209 Kinda agree, but let's admit, it happens for you as much as against you. It a good example of a neutral RNG +10 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to counter the British "I win" abilities24 May 2016, 16:07 PM Need replay for credibility of claim. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: whats wrong with the vehicles?24 May 2016, 16:04 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2016, 15:57 PMhazifeladat That takes time.. why doesnot it turn around immediately to that direction ? edit: btw is it a bug or feature or ? ( i didnot playd for two year) There was an improvement to the reverse of vehiclrs. Rather than using a button to reverse the vehicle, Relic increased the reverse range when moving the tank/vehicle to a position behind it. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: British Needs These Vehicles!24 May 2016, 14:49 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2016, 14:45 PMGrittle You know what UKF should get this vehicle: +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [week 3 may preview] alternative to crush removal24 May 2016, 14:31 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2016, 14:14 PMImagelessbean This argument seems to imply because one faction has a tank that is probably overperforming in the crushing role therefore no one should have crush. That is a false statement. Also P4 has blitz, try that when you crush you will be presently surprised. Crushing isn't just very useful to Allies, I find myself using it regularly with German factions. Also most Allied tanks are extremely vulnerable when they crush because of the amount of AT on the German side, and the number of snares they have now in the patch. There is finally a counter to those against crushing. If crushing has to go, so does combat blitz, and blitzkrieg. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Needs These Vehicles!24 May 2016, 10:45 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2016, 05:33 AMvietnamabc 1) KV-1 says hi, outdated unit is what makes SU. 2) Still better than Valentine. 3) I'll take Jeeps over UC anyday, that thing can't turn for crap, can't push inf, MG still shred it to pieces. The KV-1 is a different matter entirely, it was part of a doctrine before the times of WFA. As for the M3 Lee, we have to take into account that the British and the USF don't need this unit since they have their own medium unit which is good enough. The Matilda would just be having the same role as the Churchill, but it would be doctrinal. As for the UC, it can counter garrison units with a flamethrower and be selected as a command vehicle compared to regular jeeps since it can survive. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Needs These Vehicles!24 May 2016, 05:07 AM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2016, 20:27 PMTpain101 The British army doesn't look complete without these vehicles: 1) The M3 Lee — it would be nice to see this double cannon tank shooting two units simultaneously. 2) The Matilda Tank — a heavy tank like the Churchill and Comet, but unlike them this one should be non-doctrinal and available earlier. 3) SAS jeep — this one is not as essential the first two but would be a good idea for a mission. It's basically a jeep carrying a machine gun that fires incendiary bullets. 1) M3 Lee is outdated and surpassed by the Sherman and Cromwell. 2) Why should the Matilda be in the game? It would be redundant since the Churchill exists within the faction as a non-doctrinal heavy tank. 3) The USF has the same kind of unit; however, no one will use it because it will end up like the referred unit. Plus, the UC has a flamethrower upgrade and some armor that is better than a Kubel. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Opinion on the M4A3 Sherman?24 May 2016, 04:21 AM I like it, the Sherman has an interesting specialty against infantry. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Panzerwerfer vs Emplacements - make it burn!23 May 2016, 22:13 PM Maybe the Panzerwerfer should stun emplacements for a duration and can only be repaired by Royal Engineers. The stun will force the emplacements to decrease rate of fire, accuracy, and increase scatter. Just throwing out and idea... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IR STG or MG34 LMG21 May 2016, 16:40 PM From the general consensus from you guys, the IR STG is useful for its ability to ignore cover at medium range. I did not know that. So thanks for that information and tactics with this weapon upgrade. In: Lobby