Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??7 Apr 2015, 00:21 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2015, 00:19 AMUGBEAR I'd prefer a SU-100, SU-85 is uber outdated in COH2's time frame Long list there for the Soviets... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Brummbar7 Apr 2015, 00:19 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2015, 00:16 AMUGBEAR gib it 275~300 front armor, make it a assault tank, and its frontal armor is heavily armored historically. I think that would probably make the Sturmtiger even worse comparatively. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Brummbar7 Apr 2015, 00:08 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2015, 00:06 AMRMMLz Other problems are all fixed by fixing Otsheer's Teching. Yes please In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??6 Apr 2015, 23:03 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 22:56 PMdpfarce su85 Hhas no turret. If you increase its rotation too much you might as well just give it a turret kappa But the commander tells me it would be easier with a turret. They wouldn't lie to me like that! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS now OP?6 Apr 2015, 23:00 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 22:49 PMBananainpajamas i dont thin ptrs is that much of a problem compared too the fact that no matter how many mistakes are made. cons with ptrs spam is just to cost effective... i think the problem is that cons need to bleed more mp because people just keep making them tell callins no matter how many losses and it still works.. Tank Hunter Tactics doesn't have call-ins though. Not that this makes PTRS cons fine...very much doubt Relic would consider upping Cons' reinforcement cost with PTRSes though. There's no upgrades which inflict this upon their users. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??6 Apr 2015, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 22:25 PMturbotortoise any of the proposed changes revert the su85 closer to that state. i don't think anyone wants that. Didn't SU-85s also have really good frontal armour at that point? I don't really think the SU-85 needs a buff, just, talking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Brummbar6 Apr 2015, 22:25 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 22:18 PMZyllen The ostwind is far better in the AI role then the brumbar. a brumbar can do a lot of damage in a single shot. but it needs to hit to do so while the ostwind will simply load another 37 mm round in its gun and keep firing. Also the brumbar rarely squad wipes unless units are clumped up. Which is all the time. By the way, it's way better microing it with attack ground onto a particular unit clump rather than hoping the AI of it gets a good target (frankly, it probably aims for the center every time), especially because of the long reload time. It still won't be great in practice, but it's much better. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Tiger ace6 Apr 2015, 21:48 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 21:45 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ -1 Because relic takes forever to do anything. -2 The whine about the thought of buffing TA would be real. I know. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Brummbar6 Apr 2015, 21:42 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 21:36 PMTheSleep3r Brummbar has spike damage Also if I ever saw it (I think I saw it once since the cover-finding changes...), I'd imagine it has a much better chance of wiping squads. Of course that's still insufficient to compensate... Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 21:42 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ True but making a Thread about it would be useless Relic Hasn't/Wont fix it. I would have said that too a week ago, BUT GUARDS NOW MAN, MAYBE THERE'S A CHANCE FOR IT TOO! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Brummbar6 Apr 2015, 21:40 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 21:30 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ Just fixing its pathing first would at least let me to use it out of novelty. Its SU-76 levels of bad right now but at least the SU-76 isn't hard crippled by terrible pathing. SU-76 is less crippled and more born without limbs. In: COH2 Gameplay