Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: G43s - What's The Point?29 Aug 2015, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 19:03 PMmiragefla If PGs got a scoped G43, you'd still need the entire squad to have a weapon swap as those assault rifles don't really mix well as you'd want to stick at range rather than mid-short. Give them something between the Ober and Grenadier Kar98? Well, to be frank, the only significant advantage to PG G43s on them is a small improvement to long-range DPS...so it can't really get worse. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: G43s - What's The Point?29 Aug 2015, 19:00 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 18:57 PMelchino7 PG: i'll rather up the cost of it to 60 an give them Scoped G43 which has a chance of sniping models. That'd definitely work. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mortar in the Hole29 Aug 2015, 17:32 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 04:06 AMNuclear Arbitor frankly the trench is often a deathtrap against any kind of aoe (like the 120mm) but it was cool to be able to stick a mortar in there. do raketen still fit? Shouldn't they? Garrisoning Raketens is a fairly decent part of their advantages. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: New Commander Suggestions for existing factions. 29 Aug 2015, 03:38 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 03:20 AMCorsin Doesnt make them broken at all, and ofc the demo would cost the same.... These are layouts of commander possibilities, obviously pricing and balance would need to be worked into them. They were preeeettttttttyyyyyy broken in AA, even considering the AI's incompetence, so I'm correspondingly certain the "same" would not work in MP. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander Suggestions for existing factions. 29 Aug 2015, 01:43 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2015, 16:47 PMCorsin Rangers battalion 0cp - improved fighting positions + RE;s ability to build tank traps ect. 2cp - Ranger squad (same stats/abilities as campaign) 3cp - Grayhound call-in 8cp - Mark Vehicle (same as sov ability, making ranger zooks more effective). 8cp - Artillery gun. (M114 155mm (155mm Howitzer M1) Automatically makes it broken. At least the demo charges would need the same munition cost like everyone else...but that's probably just the tip of the iceberg of the AA Rangers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Buff Conscript PPSh-41 long range to match Mosin DPS29 Aug 2015, 01:33 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 00:47 AMMr. Someguy But then nobody would buy weapon upgrades for the same reason they don't buy the PPSh, it just makes your troops decent at one range and terrible at the rest. Combined arms. Seriously though, that's what I'd hope for - upgrades having a sufficient advantage in their good ranges to make them worth getting (almost certainly coupled with a universal cost reduction to make it work), but enough of a weakness to make not putting them on everyone be the desirable outcome. In my mind, much like the Gren-PG combo, it should feel worthwhile for upgraded Guards to have a few Scripts covering their flanks so an enemy vanilla rifle squad won't break even with it if it surprises the Guard up close...compared to now when it's like "Well, my Scripts have AT grenades". But let's be honest, rebalancing around that would be rather close to making a new game...especially if, as mentioned, upgrade costs go down because of newfound drawbacks to them, 'cause then all the other muni sinks gotta get balanced around how some major muni sinks became not major muni sinks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Conscript PPSh-41 long range to match Mosin DPS28 Aug 2015, 22:43 PM I'm here to play contrarian again by saying I'd much prefer infantry upgrades be differentiated by range weakness much like the PPSh-41 upgrade! Make players not auto-upgrade LMGs when it makes infantry trash as close-range! But what's the point, I know that's not going to happen... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: XCOM28 Aug 2015, 21:38 PM 2 is delayed for February 5th, 2016. In: Other Games
Thread: Anyone else annoyed by the day 1 DLC within DLC?28 Aug 2015, 21:34 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2015, 15:46 PMmrako I played RO2 and the guys bothered to model real tank interiors, actual locations never mind how good their game was their passion is obvious. I nerded out when I realized I was able to adjust my rifle's sights to 1000+ metres. In: Lobby
Thread: Playing USF is a waste of time in team games28 Aug 2015, 21:29 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2015, 21:01 PMUnfinisheddonut Nobody is forcing you to play them, stop wasting your precious time. Well, technically he could be forced to play with them. In: COH2 Gameplay