Playing USF is a waste of time in team games
28 Aug 2015, 20:59 PM
#1
1 
Posts: 551
Playing USF is a waste of time in team games. I am talking about 3 vs 3 and 4 vs 4. Its just USF is too weak and fragile. Late game USF is not even present in. Something gotta be done. Where are the promised rangers and heavy tanks? When will they be introduced?
28 Aug 2015, 21:01 PM
#2
1 
Posts: 77
Nobody is forcing you to play them, stop wasting your precious time.
I'm really "good" at video games.
28 Aug 2015, 21:27 PM
#3
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
wow youre fast m8 
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
28 Aug 2015, 21:28 PM
#4
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
i like playing them and had success.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
28 Aug 2015, 21:29 PM
#5
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Nobody is forcing you to play them, stop wasting your precious time.
Well, technically he could be forced to play with them.
28 Aug 2015, 21:50 PM
#6
15 Posts: 164
Please stop the rage threads/polls.
I don't think anyone wants to discuss the emotional pain you've suffered by playing the USF.
I don't think anyone wants to discuss the emotional pain you've suffered by playing the USF.
28 Aug 2015, 22:00 PM
#7
1 Posts: 551
Please stop the rage threads/polls.
I don't think anyone wants to discuss the emotional pain you've suffered by playing the USF.
Relic producer said playing coh2 should be a pleasant expirience. Fuck no, not USF. Other factions yes, but not USF in team games.
28 Aug 2015, 22:15 PM
#8
Posts: 1701
pffff its easy man, I win a lot of game as USF, stop exaggerating
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
28 Aug 2015, 22:31 PM
#9
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
pffff its easy man, I win a lot of game as USF, stop exaggerating
You have 0 USF games played, and 4 Allied AT games...
28 Aug 2015, 22:50 PM
#10
Posts: 824
Relic producer said playing coh2 should be a pleasant expirience. Fuck no, not USF. Other factions yes, but not USF in team games.
For some people it is, Relic didn't make this game JUST FOR YOU.
Youtube Streaming: https://www.youtube.com/@broodwarjc1517/streams
28 Aug 2015, 23:21 PM
#11
Posts: 211
For large games like that as USF you need a prodigious ability to micro. But the biggest problem are the Jacksons. I find that one is fairly easy to handle, but if you have two or more then they frequently get stuck on terrain and on each other. By late (or late-late) game, you simultaneously need at least 3 Jacksons and 2 Scotts (or Shermans, or some other AI), and you have to play a game akin to 'floor is lava' with the multiple roaming shrek blobs and Target Weak Points while all your tanks are spinning on the spot, getting hitched on pebbles. As Soviets, you just get a well-maintained IS2 and your regular other units. While you are doing all that, you must manage your Rifles for capping, smoking, flanking, and dodging grenades.
I think the USF situation in the late stage of large team games could be largely helped by giving Jacksons more maneuverability.
I think the USF situation in the late stage of large team games could be largely helped by giving Jacksons more maneuverability.
28 Aug 2015, 23:42 PM
#12
8 
Posts: 146
Yeah, It can get tough in the late game when you have to micro a bunch of fragile tanks vs a couple axis heavies. For that kind of games the airborne commander seems to work the best, the rocket strafe can heavily damage tanks and force them to move so you can push with your armies.
28 Aug 2015, 23:52 PM
#13
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
You have 0 USF games played, and 4 Allied AT games...
baited.
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
29 Aug 2015, 01:06 AM
#14
1 Posts: 1276
USF even with the upcoming patch so far looks like a 1v1 faction. Brits on the contrary look like the exact opposite of being a team faction and not a 1v1
29 Aug 2015, 01:19 AM
#15
1 Posts: 412
You have 0 USF games played, and 4 Allied AT games...
I'm sure they are all just custom games. OpieOP
29 Aug 2015, 02:33 AM
#16
Posts: 1891
USF even with the upcoming patch so far looks like a 1v1 faction. Brits on the contrary look like the exact opposite of being a team faction and not a 1v1
I think that Brits and USF in 2 vs 2 will be unstoppable if played right.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
29 Aug 2015, 02:51 AM
#17
1 Posts: 615
pffff its easy man, I win a lot of game as USF, stop exaggerating
Your randoms stats:
OKW: 130 matches
USF: 0 matches
USSR: 1 match
OST: 388 matches
Your AT stats:
Axis: 556
Allies: 4
Okay... that is one issue. But you're going to be active in the balance forums with these stats!?!?!? Are you a moron... or? Man people like you don't deserve to sign up for the forum cuz Axis is all you'll play and still say "nerf Allies buff Axis" when you don't even play Allies.
| Playercard of NorthWeapon | |||||||||||||||||||
|
COH2 YouTube Channel
I'm making a videogame based off of CoH2
29 Aug 2015, 03:00 AM
#18
Posts: 2053
I think that Brits andUSFSoviets in 2 vs 2 will be unstoppable if played right.
Spam cheese faction + Quality faction = Super advantageous.
No need to bother with the limitations of USF.
Especially when there is a Brit commander that can give cons dual LMGs (at the brit player's expensive, but not like the faction is reliant on muni for everything..)
29 Aug 2015, 05:52 AM
#19
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Rage post.
According to another thread (Which I'm too lazy to find) USF is very powerful in teamgames, but just needs a lot more co-ordination and micro (Which is not fine). But that doesn't mean we can run around starting rage threads.
Team games in general have a lot of problems and it appears fixing them is not at the top of Relic's priority list.
According to another thread (Which I'm too lazy to find) USF is very powerful in teamgames, but just needs a lot more co-ordination and micro (Which is not fine). But that doesn't mean we can run around starting rage threads.
Team games in general have a lot of problems and it appears fixing them is not at the top of Relic's priority list.
29 Aug 2015, 06:10 AM
#20
Posts: 758
Playing USF is a waste of time in team games. I am talking about 3 vs 3 and 4 vs 4. Its just USF is too weak and fragile. Late game USF is not even present in. Something gotta be done. Where are the promised rangers and heavy tanks? When will they be introduced?
hopefully they wont be shit post September 3 patch we already seen the leaked alpha images of the M26 Pershing so expect and anticipate changes for the USF in the future
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
44 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
49 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.841223.790+4
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1259
Board Info
670 users are online:
670 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49851
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM