Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: CoH2 Board Game21 Nov 2015, 15:19 PM Remember that? Well, it's still happening. Sidenote, those hi-res portraits are sexy as hell and I want to have access to them too. In: Lobby
Thread: UKF will be hopeless with the new patch21 Nov 2015, 04:52 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2015, 01:30 AMRifleman89 So you might have to protect him like the other factions....how unthoughtful of relic welcome to the club! The other factions get engine-damage or Panzerschrecks to make light vehicles go "Are you reallllllyyyyyyyy sure you want to do that?". The Brits' lack of it, therefore, give their enemies a lot more room to have their vehicles drive-by the AT sniper. Imagine the Wehrmacht being without Panzerfausts - their sniper would be having to retreat the moment they hear an engine in the fog of war anywhere nearby them for an awful lot of the game. I didn't agree with how the AT Sniper was before, but I can't see myself agreeing with the state of him after. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF will be hopeless with the new patch20 Nov 2015, 22:39 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2015, 22:35 PMJadame! Doesnt change the fact. Even USF RNG railroad arty can be used as sector denial. Zeroing arty? You can walk through it with whole blob and take 0 damage as long as they dont go in column or micro units out taking 0 damage again even with support weapons which need time to pack up. Total joke ability. I've only just realized your avatar is an edit of a picture Stalin when he was younger (which, being Stalin, was totally edited already, of course) What took me so long In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry bulletins effect 20 Nov 2015, 02:52 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2015, 02:41 AMATCF 396 armor, my god..... Suck it every tank except Jagdtigers In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Patchnotes20 Nov 2015, 02:31 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2015, 02:21 AMOmega_Warrior Yeah I was always for simply buffing the barrage instead of the suppression in the first place. I always thought the suppresion was a bad way to buff it, but now it's just back to square 1. I have hope for your cause! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Patchnotes20 Nov 2015, 02:14 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2015, 00:07 AMOmega_Warrior the price increase on volks is minimal. Especially compared to their new increased effectiveness, dual grenades, more accesible schreks, and the extra manpower from the cheaper strums. The pack is an extremely vulnerable unit that has neither the retreat capability of mortars, or the gun shield and range of the lieg. It also has no anti infantry flak gun safe zone to fall back to and fire from. On top of this there isn't even a suppression unit to protect it in the captain tier. If the enemy infantry comes into range of t they can easily fire on it all the way back to the base. That means the pack always has to pack up and retreat before the infantry is in range or it will be wiped. before the suppression allowed the pack to slow down assaults to give it more time to fire and run away. now the pack will have much less time to fire and retreat in assaults. It'll provably struggle to get even 3 shots off before it has to get out of dodge even with a decent rifle screen. It's K man, now suggesting it be buffed to be pretty decent as a long-range howitzer for countering say, Pak 43s, would seem far more feasible? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Calliope/ Goliath commanders incoming20 Nov 2015, 00:49 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2015, 00:43 AMpigsoup 184,64€. i apparently spent 100 full days in coh2... omg. mathematically, it is worth it for fans like me. O.O Now, TRUE fans say that upon comprehending numbers like that instead of some kind of namby-pamby revelation of time and productiveness wasted. In: Lobby
Thread: Calliope/ Goliath commanders incoming19 Nov 2015, 22:49 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2015, 22:07 PMWhat Doth Life?! Don't get me wrong, I would rather see more versatility in the non-doctrinal armies I'd also especially take the commanders all feeling more or less feeling good and balanced... In: Lobby
Thread: close the pocket19 Nov 2015, 22:18 PM If enemy territory is out of supply, Close the Pocket kicks it in the balls (for real, light arty, JU-87s and Stuka Dive Bombs will hit those places). Otherwise, mortars barrage frontline enemy territory. This lasts up to the ability's duration. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hope for USF AT-Gun?19 Nov 2015, 02:45 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Nov 2015, 19:45 PMOmega_Warrior They should atleast remove cooldown for the AP shells. Nothing worse then having it run out vs a heavy then being left with an AT gun that can't do shit. Maybe just a tad bit more base pen, but not much. Way too many people don't make use of the AP shells enough though. I even see pro tourney players neglecting to use it. Yeah, any problems with it are entirely the AP shells. The rest is all good points, aside from the 4-man squad of which it has a vet ability that can reduce that flaw. The poor pen without the shells is justified by its low cost. Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2015, 02:29 AMStrummingbird 1.5X penetration (115/125/140 -> 172.5/187.5/210) For comparison: ZiS-3, 180/190/200 Pak 40, 190/200/210 Raketenwerfer, 180/190/200 6-Pounder, same as Pak 40 So it's reasonably within the same range of a Raketen's DPS for the duration though the 57mm's accuracy is worse (unless you're crazy enough to manage to put it at close-range to invalidate that and give it 10 more pen), slightly worse pen traded off with fire-rate. The fire-rate's higher enough that it's probably flat-out better than a ZiS-3 for the duration. In: COH2 Balance