Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback5 Jan 2021, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 11:48 AMthedarkarmadillo Of course I don't mean flank, but if the enemy has the counter present in that area, operate elsewhere. One of the biggest boons of the Scott is its mobility. Assuming the barrage still functions well, that will be used when AT is present, maybe even on the AT to push it off and allow the Scott room to roam So do you think it's still think it's worth 75 fuel? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Run and Gun5 Jan 2021, 21:51 PM Who the fuck uses an M5 as a clown car? That would be horribly wasteful Don't see how this change is even slightly necessary In: Lobby
Thread: Penals, the Elephant in the room5 Jan 2021, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 08:04 AMVipper Ok I will call them transition units if it makes you happy. Providing some good reasoning that your changes are better than what's in the patch would be preferred In: Lobby
Thread: Penals, the Elephant in the room5 Jan 2021, 07:52 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:45 AMVipper To me turning an all round unit to specialized is redesign That's already what penals do Vipper. They are not all around units, they can be one at time. They can't switch back and forth like an ISU Guards are all around units. Penals can be one or the other, that's clearly not the same. All that change was intended for appease your strange issue with their having the flexibility of when to make that choice In: Lobby
Thread: Penals, the Elephant in the room5 Jan 2021, 07:42 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:30 AMVipper It will also be a redesign of Penal something you have claimed at it will would "complicate". It's hardly a redesign, that was the whole point. It was a simple solution avoiding the need to redesign in the first place But I'll say once again, i don't think it's necessary. I think the current trajectory in the patch is a good one. Yours is very unclear In: Lobby
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback5 Jan 2021, 06:58 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 04:06 AMthedarkarmadillo ... Shouldn't getting more than 1 be risky? I'd much rather it be risky than the oppressive... Thing.. It's been in the past. Yeah...? I don't think I said it shouldn't be. I also don't want to be the way it was in the past. My point is that with new nerfs it would be very risky even with a cost decrease. Only reason to keep old price with nerfs like that is if we're worried about people getting multiple We shouldn't be worried about people getting multiple, it just won't be practical, even with a slightly lower cost. It just doesn't seem to be worth 75 fuel anymore In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 03:57 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 02:52 AMporkloin Snip You just did sniper OR clowncar. He said sniper AND clown car... That means in one build If you actually read Serriths post you will find nothing close to him saying that ost is OP. Relax In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback4 Jan 2021, 23:21 PM I don't think the new Scott is useless but it really should get at least a small cost decrease. Nerfing it's range by 10 makes getting more than 1 pretty risky and micro intensive, so I don't think there's any reason it should still have it's old price In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals, the Elephant in the room4 Jan 2021, 23:13 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 10:32 AMVipper That would be improvement with better result but it would be a redesign of Penal battalion since they would be an AI unit only. You're the one who just said it's a problem that they can fight infantry and then become AT. So make them pick ptrs or SVTs before they build it instead of after That's the simplest fix to the thing you say is an issue. Like I said I don't think they should do it In: Lobby
Thread: Penals, the Elephant in the room4 Jan 2021, 10:27 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 10:15 AMVipper If I I want Penal nerfed that is what I would have suggested Your "suggestions" are not clear at all. The point you most often repeat is "they simply need to be redesigned" which itself is a contradictory statement. There's nothing simple about redesigning a unit and tech structure Not to mention "redesigning" can still be nerfing. Those two things aren't opposite Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 10:15 AMVipper Allowing penal to fill all role from superior AI, to Anti LV to, to anti medium is simply bad design especially in faction with some many unit available to them stock and doctrinal. If this is your problem then the only thing needed is to make the SVT and ptrs variants two different squads in the same tier. That would actually be a "simple" change. But really not necessary In: Lobby