Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback10 Jan 2021, 20:48 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2021, 20:42 PMProtos Angelus Oh, sorry about that. Yeah, if one removes the self smoke canister, that would be a big hit to it's survivability that would have to be offset by WP or something like that. WP is really effective against AT guns and it temporary disables main guns on tanks so I think it would be a safe trade In: COH2 Balance
Thread: suggestion for SOV10 Jan 2021, 20:11 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2021, 19:51 PMBetterDead ThanRed would it really be necessary to rework commanders? really don't know how much work would be needed to create an offspin of guards for tech. That probably wouldn't be too bad, but why do it? And what would the offspin be, more specialized guards? The current patch is already improving the soviets stock AT infantry In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback10 Jan 2021, 20:04 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2021, 19:41 PMProtos Angelus Smoke barrage is in my opinion superior to WP. At least in it's current form on Scott. Large AOE, no muni cost, Ability to carpet it. Indispensable in team games. Don't know how many times I've won an engagement thanks to Scotts smoke barrage covering tanks from Elefants and other menaces. Yeah the smoke barrage serves a different role than WP though. I'm talking about removing the vet 1 personal smoke, not the smoke barrage. My point is that it doesn't need the personal smoke because it has the barrage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback10 Jan 2021, 19:03 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2021, 16:53 PMthedarkarmadillo what the scott needs, i think, is an INACCURATE barrage option, something more like a howitzer barrage where it could potentially damage a whole area. since usf lack rockets its difficult to break up a wall of infantry and a little scatter might go a long way. White phosphorus barrage would do the trick on that too. Lock it behind vet 1, shared cooldown. Get rid of smoke dispenser, unnecessary anyway with the smoke barrage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: suggestion for SOV10 Jan 2021, 19:01 PM Several commanders would need a rework for this change, and it doesn't seem all that necessary in the first place tbh In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim reinforce cost10 Jan 2021, 17:06 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2021, 16:45 PMElaindil Maxim dominates "changes that have to be made" list for the balance team. Lol well played In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove counter-barrage.10 Jan 2021, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2021, 20:59 PMVipper After reading so many time that Quad (and/or M36) needs to be OP AA because it the only AA Soviet (and/or the only TD USF ) get stock, I can't really say that I am surprised to see some else using a similar argument. Those are not the same arguments as OP's, but I'm not surprised to see you saying this _________ Counter barrage is mostly fine imo. It's not too oppressive or amazing, it's just right. Can be a bit wonky sometimes, but I don't think it's unfair in either direction If the lefh feels too good with it to some then I think the ml20 should get a buff. The lefh feels just right the ml20 feels slightly underpowered In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschrimjaegers uniqueness 10 Jan 2021, 09:33 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2021, 20:43 PMDerKuhlmann Then we have fallshrimjaegers which has nothing, if you don´t count grenade which every combat unit has They have 2 grenades, which every combat unit most certainly does not have. Yes obers have those nades too, but they're really good nades And fg42 is very unique, as others have said In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback8 Jan 2021, 19:04 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 18:59 PMElaindil But requiring the player to consciously toggle and untoggle this button just to move is just dumb when there's not a SINGLE other unit who needs that. I am not arguing against this I think that the Rak retreating is a problem independently of it's camo function. My point is that improving that function while it still has a feature it shouldn't is not a good idea. Especially improving it in a way that used to be completely broken Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 18:59 PMVipper And it vet 0 RW was still a lot faster than zis/M-42 that has speed bellow 1. Well I can't debate what the words "A Lot" mean to you. I can say that I have no problem with your goal as long as you don't give the Rak movement with camo. Or feel free to rework it completely and remove retreat In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback8 Jan 2021, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 18:53 PMElaindil Can you provide an example of this consistency change being OP? Like you still move your raketens aggressively with or without cloak so there's no point arguing this one. Yeah I just said that... That's a balance issue all by itself is my point The example is the old Rak? Did you play the game during the Rak creeping? In: COH2 Balance