Sorry, I actually played in the last 4v4 tourney and I know for a fact the Sov/Sov/USF/USF comp was the meta. Soviets Maxim build alongside USF airbourne was absolutely insanely good. Even teams not running that comp always had Soviets since their tools are way too valuable to pass up. On top of that, Soviets are incredibly strong with IL2 bombs, katy, ISU152 and mark target. I am not even gonna entertain your dumb notion of soviets being bad in 4v4, they are a top 2 faction in every single game mode.
Graph 1: Axis is OP? Maybe the players just suck at playing allies and actually using their tools? I wager 99% of the playerbase that complains USF sucks would change their tune in a hurry if they actually played USF Airbourne cancer.
Graph 2: The playerbase sucks at playing Soviets. Plain and simple.
Mate you may be a decent player but your statistical understanding is so underpar it hurts reading your comments.
First off, "I know for a fact the Sov/Sov/USF/USF comp was the meta" is laughable.
Second, you cannot disregard solid numbers and statistical proofs just because you think different. I would make a big techinal proof of why you are wrong but I am pretty sure I would waste my time.