Profile of BasedSecretary

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1197

General Information


Thread: Further Evidence that COH3 is Trash30 Aug 2022, 12:50 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2022, 12:05 PMOKSpitfire I understand the broader point you are making, but a prototype from 1945 is definitely not 'literally the same thing' as space elves and aliens from the far future. Part of me would actually enjoy seeing the reaction if relic trolled everybody and pretended to do a COH vs 40k RTS. Ratte was designed in 1942 can i add it to italian front bro? yes or no? In: COH3 Central
Thread: Further Evidence that COH3 is Trash30 Aug 2022, 11:30 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2022, 11:29 AMOziligath So spamming pathfinders is realisitic? M8 scott spam same? TD spam realistic? come on. it goes over and over. Is there is one thing unrealistic it's tactic. can i add ratte and maus>? In: COH3 Central
Thread: Further Evidence that COH3 is Trash30 Aug 2022, 11:28 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2022, 11:26 AMOziligath So what do you want? realism? Explain, why on earth is a prototype tank such a big deal? Can I add MAUS and RATTE then? Yes or no answer me? You want pipe dream machines to make it into the game? Ratte is "basically" from the same point in history, it's "basically" a tank and it's "basically" a working prototype. Yes or NO? In: COH3 Central
Thread: Further Evidence that COH3 is Trash30 Aug 2022, 11:27 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2022, 10:05 AMOziligath Because you want a game in a WW2 settings what else? If you want space marines go for DoW. Stop pointing ridiculous examples. Is the black Prince looking like a WW2 tank? yes? Is it really putting you out of immersion? Then Why do you play with 30 guys an artillery piece, 3 tanks and 2 support weapon, this doesnt make a sens historicly speaking. If they want to put IS-3 why not? panther 2 why not? It's a game about WW2 not a documentary. And if you don't like their choices fine but maybe stop complaining for hours and hours on a niche forum. Don't like the game? don't buy it easy. I would actually like to point out that most of COH2 tactics are realistic battlefied scenarios. The game discourages you from letting a tank roam around in fear of getting it mined, snared or whatever. That's exactly how real life armored warfare works, since there is the textbook danger of the enemy climbing and jacking the tank. THat's why tank columns are always protected by infantry. The game discourages you sending a squad to death since you can vet it and send it out again more able to fight. This also reflects the real life manpower shortages every nation experienced. and on and on and on The only aspects of the game that are "arcadey" are the ones that ease the game experience, ie. squads are not so squishy just because it's unfun to ask a player to keep making squads like aoe2. So talking about "immersion", BP would actually break it. Plain and simple. In: COH3 Central
Thread: Further Evidence that COH3 is Trash30 Aug 2022, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2022, 10:35 AMCrecer13 Bergepanzer Tiger existed, they were remade from damaged Tigers, there were 3 of them. Ladungsliger Tiger what was called Brgetiger in CoH1 also existed. The British at one time mistakenly called this unique Tiger “Bergetiger with a crane”. This is just an inaccuracy, because at that time there were still few available sites and books about tanks, even now the archives reveal to us new details about tanks that we did not know. Of course Bege Tiger existed, since the germans knew that it's not enough to build a tank you had to have a good way of removing it from a bad place. The fact is every weapon in the game was actually used in battlefield situations in ww2 and what angers me the most is that they have so fucking much to add that's actually realistic and they end up fucking adding a 1945 prototype of a tank it's just absurd. We are talking about the biggest conflict in history and you cannot find a proper heavy tank to give to brits? Come on lelic In: COH3 Central
Thread: CoH3 trailer30 Aug 2022, 11:14 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2022, 21:41 PMSkysTheLimit There's literally a thread titled "further evidence coh3 is trash". I think there's a massive difference between asking for more positive attitude and expecting everyone to agree with you. Those aren't the same thing In fact, based is the one who seems to lose his mind the most everytime someone even dares to suggest he might be wrong/overreacting. Look at how he responds to sneakeyes disagreement in this thread. That's someone who, like you, has actually contributed to this game, and based can't even be respectful while disagreeing with him He's not required to be nice, it's the internet. But to be surprised that people react negatively to him when negativity is the only thing he contributes is just dumb I suggest you read a book. Start with the normie classics like 1984. When skepticism is received as something ethically questionable (""""negativity"""" in your words) you know you have to do with sheep. And I am not being disrespectful to anybody. The guy you are referring to defended lelic without a single shred of evidence. I gave him the shitty explosive mechanics 2 months away from launch and he shrugged it off "That's no evidence" I gave him the shitty animations, tank riding which features models floating mid air and he shrugged it off "Game is still in alpha" on and on and on If a guy wants to be blind, the man that attempts to help him becomes the victim. In: COH3 Central
Thread: CoH3 trailer30 Aug 2022, 11:11 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2022, 20:19 PMRosbone I am always confused by these people. If you want an echo chamber go to some weird Twitter group. This is a place where people come together to talk about Coh2. Good and Bad. There is good info to be gathered from every comment. Sure, Based and Kuro can sound pretty toxic. And I will ALWAYS shit on Relic while match making is trash. But we do it because WE CARE. Everyone here wants Coh3 to be the best game ever. Being bothered because someone says something bad about Relic just shows you are closed minded. And do not CARE about anyone's experience except your own. Sneakeye and I have done a lot of work to make the game better. So, I respect anything he says. Even if he says "Rosbone sucks balls". As long as he backs it up with some facts, data, or something we can learn from. I am totally fine with it. I will happily read anything he has to say. He said Rosbone is toxic. And I agree. It may seem that way to some. Please skip over my, Based, and Kuros comments whenever you feel there is nothing to gain from them. You are not forced to read them. We are nobody just like you guys. If someone says the coh3 animations suck balls, simply say "They look Ok to me I will still buy it." Easy. At this point, it is too late for Relic to fix the Coh2 match making. Coh3 will be here soon. So, I will probably stop trashing them very soon. Until I see how Coh3 match making is. Then I will drop a Mega Neutron Dookie Bomb on Coh3 the likes have yet to be seen BUWHAAAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHH Seriously though, Coh3 does not look terrible. Just unfinished. And everyone agrees with that fact. No one is disputing it. Decent points. Allow me to say my piece: I never suck up to nobody, even if it's the developer of my favorite game and do you know why? Because at the end of the day they are people that get paid to make a product. And that's how they see it themselves. Most of the original COH team either left or got fired and the lead director of COH died in a tragic car accident (Rest in Peace Legend). And allow me to remind you that the only reason COH2 got made in the first place was because the Eastern Front mod for COH1 was more popular than the base game itself. It was just a milking opportunity which, with some luck and skill became a 10 year old running game. COH3 has none of this shit. It's literally made by employees who get paid to do it. No visionaries like the original team were. So, that's how you have to treat it. Like any other faceless product by a mid tier corporation. With plenty of skepticism and """""negativity""""". Even AOE4 did not consult the original creators of AOE2... they just made something. That's my problem with game indudstry in general. No visionaries, no masterminds just faceless corporations making games on the assumption that if they carry a heavy enough name, people would buy it. And you fall for it every single time (not you ros im talking in general). In: COH3 Central
Thread: CoH3 trailer30 Aug 2022, 11:06 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2022, 19:59 PMRosbone Yes, I spent 1000's of hours trying to help make the game better for everyone. And was promptly rewarded with a 23 game losing streak due to shit match making. Then spent the next 2 months playing with complete retards trying to get those ranks back. But can't because MORE shit match making. Relic Me No one that has ever helped Relic has made out in the end. They always get screwed over and leave the community. All I ask is for Relic to step up and do a better job than an intern would do their first week. Is that too much to ask? lol nice use of gif In: COH3 Central
Thread: Further Evidence that COH3 is Trash30 Aug 2022, 11:05 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2022, 17:35 PMKurobane At least Paradox actually fixes bugs and is significantly more competent than Relic is. Speaking of competence EA is considered to be the most incompetent gaming studio in the world. Even having being voted the worst company in America numerous times. Complete Fecal Matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_of_Heroes_3 The lead game director of COH3 is David Littman. This human fecal matter brought us Battlefield Hardline and is now bringing us Company of Heroes 3. So if anyone is wondering why Relic is utterly clueless it is because Relic is the new EA. This is exactly why I won't buy COH3. Relic is releases products that are pure At this point the most I can hope for is they do what every other company does and do a remaster/remake of COH1. At least then I know I would be playing a quality game instead of EA Relic trash. On point. I doubt even a COH1 remake would work tbh. In: COH3 Central
Thread: Bofors are OP29 Aug 2022, 17:26 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2022, 07:57 AMOKSpitfire I might be a minority in saying this, i'm not sure. But does anyone else just dislike having emplacements in the game in general? Their not OP obviously, and I get that they are supposed to be the Brits 'thing' but i've always found them annoying, going right back to the first game as well. Actually that's a biased lie. I loved the flak 88. Well, look. Brits in COH1 used to be not "static" but "mobile" having OKW-style halftracks as command buildings that you could push a button to move and secure point. And if you see you were losing said point, you could remove it again and move it to a better place. It was a good, if micro intensive style. Now some genius at lelic took this idea and translated it to plain SimCity 4 experience. After 5 years, we realize its bad. In: COH2 Balance