Profile of TheSleep3r

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 670

General Information


Thread: Some thoughts about the Red Army9 Sep 2015, 18:18 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 18:12 PMThe Prussian Officer Remove the awful ramming ability and give it some worthy veterancy abilities. Why not actually adding some meaning to it? Why not add some powerful consequences of ramming vehicles from the back? Why is T-34/76's role being the cheap throwaway tank that can do some good with numbers, flanking and micro, yet after flanking, microing and executing a good ram nothing really happens? I really wish I could answer these questions Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 18:16 PMMorrodes If we are going to talk about history: The t34 was actually better than the P4 and the reason, why the germans developed the panther. [/76]1941 P4's yes. 1944 P4's no. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 17:48 PMKeaper! The faction is way more polished in terms of design (both gameplay and aesthetically.) Yeah, this is a real shame UKF has no winter announce or vickers custom unit portrait, it would feel complete at least for me. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 17:28 PMHux Yeah you're right I'm sure they designed the voice files and UI to intentionally mislead us about having access to the wrong units because thats the hallmark of great faction design, right? Having to rearrange stuff afterwards... If you don't think these errors are evidence of poor initial design then I'm at a loss for what you think is going on. #BrainFart Top kek. The voice files and UI misleading users are signs of changes of faction scheme, not "bad faction design". The voice file of rocket artillery is in the game because Panzerwerfer 42 was in T3 back in the days, and there is no direct implication that this was the cause of bad faction design. The Tankoviy Battalion tier was changed so recently and you still have no clue the description of it was not updated and is not relevant to faction design at all. You have no idea what you are talking about. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 17:14 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 17:06 PMHux [british faction] sure as hell beats the others that tell you that you've got access to rocket artillery when you don't and tells you you've got access to traditionally turreted tanks when you also don't #FactionDesignFacepalm Since when UI mistakes are contributing to faction design? #Coh2.orgUsersLogicFacepalm In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why T4 T34/76 is a mistake 9 Sep 2015, 16:56 PM I wanna be the very best Like no one ever was To build them is my real test To ram them is my cause I will travel across the map Spamming far and wide Each T-34 to understand The power that's inside T-34, (gotta ram them all) it's you and me I know its my destiny /76, oh, you're my best friend In a VP we must defend T-34, (gotta ram them all) OKW so OP Our courage will pull us through You ram me and I'll ram you (T-34) Gotta ram'em all In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Industry8 Sep 2015, 18:57 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 18:49 PMJonky It would work the same as at the moment. You'd have to save enough manpower to at least have T4 up and to reinforce your army for some time if you desire. You're signing the eventual death warrant for your infantry for the ability to keep up tank production all throughout the game. Sure, if you activate it at 3CPs it would destroy your game, but that's the same as SI now Well I don't want to argue because you are indeed right, but I only want to add that you are right practically. Theoritically infantry squads are still able to be produced in an urgent need to cap some points. I'd like it to stay that way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Industry8 Sep 2015, 18:42 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 18:27 PMJonky 1. Decrease vehicle MP costs by a %, increase/double infantry reinforce costs. This fits in with the commander relying heavily on vehicles, limiting infantry play by keeping it prohibitively expensive while not causing such an unsustainable MP drain from tanks. Tanks used to be much cheaper MP wise which was the original point of this commander. I think 33% would be enough to extend sustainability a long way. I like this idea. Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 18:27 PMJonky 2. Decrease vehicle MP costs to nothing, stop all MP income. This completely removes infantry sustainability as any you have is almost inevitably worn away, it doesn't vastly increase early game vehicle play which is very fuel dependent but makes late game possibilities very open. Whoa man. Without a way to obtain manpower this is not suitable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20158 Sep 2015, 18:33 PM Combat teams received accuracy removal when? In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Connections anyone?7 Sep 2015, 19:28 PM That's a nice initiative, hope you'll also tell relic to buff allies by the way In: Lobby
Thread: Easy 8 priority target6 Sep 2015, 14:30 PM Yep, gonna be fixed next patch In: COH2 Bugs