Anticipate it. Try to be there, before the Kubel arrives. It's a close race, but you should win. Do a delayed tech, build t2 after 4 cons, ideally when your engie retreated after pulling his weight in the first fight(s). Get into one of the houses, keep a constant stream of cons coming.
|
GG WP!
I have good faith in what's going to come! |
Its all about prioritys and decals should not be a priority at this moment of the game.
Its like having a football team that has mediocre players and the president is buying nice looking new shirts instead of buying new better players or do more training sessions so the team gets better.
It more in the line of the president gets someone to sponsor the team and there are new shirts with the sponsor logo on it. So with this money the team can afford better players and more training sessions. Don't you think? |
"As part", is what you propably overread. 2 Obers vs 4 Conscripts is not as onesided as you make it be. But when there are no Schreckvolks, which sheep mentioned, you'd be far better with the T-70 anyway. When there are volks and you just throw one maxim into the equation, obers have to focus it while cons close the distance.
I do agree with you about the attempt to trade part. And would even say vetting Obers in xp rich shootouts is propably still not tradeworthy. |
Wait... you use conscripts to counter obers?
Do you also use T-70s to counter KT?
You don't play this game much at all, right?
*looks at playercard*
Nope, you do not.
As part of the equivalent in army strength to his force when he builds 2 obers. Yes. And something of the other mentioned things.
Did i imply using a T-70 against a KT? But if you want to put it that way, i'll throw a T-34 behind a KT anytime of the day if it got support.
I indeed do play this game. Lets play a 1v1 and find out what your big mouth is worth. |
Soviets:
Demo Charges. Mortars. Conscripts, lots of them. Katusha. Mines. M3 quad. double maxims and merge. T-70.
US:
Rifleman (vet) + smoke nade. 1919Paras. Scott. Aaht. Sherman. Trollcanistershot. |
Secondly- I presume playing both games of a set on the same map is permitted? just to make things a little more fair, if participants agree to it.
Thats an absolute necessaty i think. So I do agree! |
Troll option
My vote goes from Semoskiy to Kholodny Summer (missclick)
Btw more people then players have voted, which also could explain some votes for stalingrad |
99% of those who whine about stale meta and single unit blobbing loose 99% of their games because of lazy micro, wrong stategic decisions and the lack of awareness. The amount of games, close enough in skill, to be decided by balance difference is much smaller then those make it be.
Its sad, that you loose the joy in playing a game you obviously care enough about to post a thread telling exactly that in gameplay discussion forum.
4 Factions, A shitload of commanders. I don't know about you, but i have around 15 different tactics to approach this game depending on faction choice and the enemy/combination of enemys i see. I'm far from mastering them all. None of those include less then 5 different units. I like those combined arms. And they do work. And yes, sometimes it takes more effort to punish the blob, then to a-move it. But then again, it brings me uberjoy to see those blobs transform into little xp values floating to the sky.
Have fun, whatever you do, and good luck with it! |
That exact scenario has been addressed multiple times if you actually read the thread.
I did in fact follow the thread. I might have higher standards regarding what can be called "topic discussed and dismissed". I did reply to your post, cause you stated none of the possible ways of implemantation could be anything but complete catastrophcal failure. And, speculation about propability aside, i really dont see, how any of your more elaborate posts in this thread have named reasons why having degradation on dropped content is in anyway harmfull to people that decide to buy it.
|